Two experimental studies examined the possibility that the need for cognitive closure (NfCC) affects the tendency to exhibit transference effects in social encounters. They reveal that the transference effect is more pronounced when individuals' (dispositional) NfCC is high (vs. low). In Study 1, this effect is demonstrated with respect to the transference of false memories about a newly encountered target person generalized from one's representation of a significant other. In Study 2, it is demonstrated with respect to the transference of both false memories and affective reaction to a new leader based on one's representation of a past leader. The discussion considers the role of motivation in the transference effect in relation to the social cognitive and psychodynamic views of transference.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Andersen, S.M., & Baum, A. (1994). Transference in interpersonal relations: Inferences and affect based on significant-other representations. Journal of Personality, 62, 460-497.
3.
Andersen, S.M., & Berk, M.S. (1998). Transference in everyday experience: Implications of experimental research for relevant clinical phenomena. Review of General Psychology, 2, 81-120.
4.
Andersen, S.M., & Chen, S. (2002). The relational self: An interpersonal social-cognitive theory. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 619-645.
5.
Andersen, S.M., & Cole, S.W. (1990). "Do I know you?" The role of significant others in general social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 384-399.
6.
Andersen, S.M., Glassman, N.S., Chen, S., & Cole, S.W. (1995). Transference in social perception: The role of chronic accessibility in significant-other representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 41-57.
7.
Andersen, S.M., Glassman, N.S., & Gold, D.A. (1998). Mental representations of the self, significant others, and nonsignificant others: Structure and processing of private and public aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 75, 845-861.
8.
Andersen, S.M., Reznik, I., & Manzella, L.M. (1996). Eliciting facial effect, motivation, and expectancies in transference: Significant-other representations in social relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 71, 1108-1129.
9.
Asch, S.E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 1230-1240.
10.
Banks, W.P. (1970). Signal detection theory and human memory. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 81-99.
11.
Bargh, J.A., Bond, R.N., Lombardi, W.L., & Tota, M.E. (1986). The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 869-878.
12.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
13.
Baum, A., & Andersen, S.M. (1999). Interpersonal roles in transference: Transient mood effects under the condition of significant-other resemblance. Social Cognition, 17, 161-185.
14.
Berk, M.S., & Andersen, S.M. (2000). The impact of past relationships on interpersonal behavior: Behavioral confirmation in the social-cognitive process of transference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 546-562.
15.
Brewer, M.B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Chen, S., & Andersen, S.M. (1999). Relationships from the past in the present: Significant-other representations and transference in interpersonal life. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 123-190). New York: Academic Press.
17.
Dijksterhuis, A.P., Van Knippenberg, A.D., Kruglanski, A.W., & Schaper, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 32, 254-270.
18.
Fiske, S.T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In M. S. Clark & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 55-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Fiske, S.T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Fiske, S.T., & Pavelchak, M. (1986). Category-based versus piecemeal-based affective responses: Developments in schema-triggered affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (pp. 167-203). New York: Guilford.
21.
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Ford, T.E., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950-962.
23.
Freeman, G., & Hovland, C. (1934). Diurnal variation in performance and related physiological processes. Psychological Bulletin, 31, 777-799.
24.
Freud, S. (1895). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 2. Studies on hysteria. London : Hogarth Press.
25.
Freud, S. (1905). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 7. Fragment of an analysis of a case of hysteria . London: Hogarth Press.
26.
Freud, S. (1912). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 12. The dynamics of transference. London: Hogarth Press.
27.
Freund, T., Kruglanski, A., & Schpitzajzen, A. (1985). The freezing and unfreezing of impressional primacy: Effects of the need for structure and the fear of invalidity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 479-487.
28.
Glassman, N.S., & Andersen, S.M. (1996). Responding to significant others when they are not there: Effects on interpersonal inference, motivation, and affect. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 262-321). New York: Guilford .
29.
Glassman, N.S., & Andersen, S.M. (1999). Activating transference without consciousness: Using significant-other representations to go beyond what is subliminally given. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1146-1162.
30.
Heaton, A.W., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1991). Person perception by introverts and extroverts under time pressure: Need for closure effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 161-165.
31.
Hinkley, K., & Andersen, S.M. (1996). The working self-concept in transference: Significant-other activation and self change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1279-1295.
32.
Jamieson, D.W., & Zanna, M.P. (1989). Need for structure in attitude formation and expression . In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.). Attitude structure and function (pp. 383-406). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Kleitman, N. (1939). Sleep and wakefulness. Chicago : University Press.
34.
Kruglanski, A.W. (1989a). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational perspectives. New York: Plenum Press.
35.
Kruglanski, A.W. (1989b). The psychology of being "right": On the problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 395-409.
36.
Kruglanski, A.W. (2004). The psychology of closed mindedness. New York: Psychology Press.
37.
Kruglanski, A., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and un-freezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448-468.
38.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Pierro, A. (2008). Night and day, you are the one: On circardian mismatches and the transference effect in social perception. Psychological Science, 19, 296-301.
39.
Kruglanski, A.W., Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., & De Grada, E. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group centrism. Psychological Review , 113, 84-100.
40.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Sleeth-Kepler, D. (2007). On the principles of social judgment. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 116-137). New York: Guilford.
41.
Kruglanski, A.W., & Webster, D.M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing ." Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
42.
Kruglanski, A.W., Webster, D.M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
43.
Kunda, Z. (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
44.
Lockhart, R.S., & Murdock, B.B., Jr. (1970). Memory and the theory of signal detection. Psychological Bulletin, 74, 100-109.
45.
Macrae, C. N., Stangor, C., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (1996). Stereotypes and stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
46.
Nisbett, R.E., & Wilson, T.D. (1977). The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 35, 250-256.
47.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48.
Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A.W. (2005). Revised Need for Cognitive Closure Scale. Unpublished manuscript, Università di Roma , La Sapienza.
49.
Ritter, B.A., & Lord, R.G. (2007). The impact of previous leaders on the evaluation of new leaders: An alternative to prototype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1683-1695.
50.
Schneider, D. J. (Ed.). (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford.
51.
Smith, C., Reilly, C., & Midkiff, K. (1989). Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 728-738.
52.
Snodgrass, J.G. & Corwin, J. (1988). Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set. Perceptual Motor Skills, 67(1), 3-36.
53.
Stapel, D.A., Koomen, W., & Zeelenberg, M. (1998). The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: Accuracy × Knowledge Accessibility Effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 878-893.
54.
Sullivan, H.S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.
55.
Terracciano, A., McCrae, R.R., & Costa, P.T., Jr. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19, 131-141.
56.
Tetlock, P.E. (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 227-236.
57.
Thompson, E.P., Roman, R.J., Moskowitz, G.B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J.A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 447-489.
58.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
59.
Webster, D.M., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
60.
Webster, D.M., Richter, L., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1996). On leaping to conclusions when feeling tired: Mental fatigue effects on impressional primacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 181-195.
