These studies tested the hypothesis that evaluating goal feedback in terms of a primary, longer term goal can be risky for future motivation. Study 1 was a 2 × 2 experiment in which framing level (primary goal/subgoal) and feedback valence (success/failure) were manipulated for participants during a verbal skills task. In the primary goal failure condition, there was increased negative mood and decreased positive mood and expectancy for subsequent trials, even while controlling for goal difficulty and importance. Study 2 was an 8-week study throughout which participants were asked to evaluate their progress regarding a primary goal (class grade goal) or subgoal (weekly study hours goal), and success or failure varied naturally. When progress was lacking, participants in the primary goal condition experienced the largest decreases in mood and expectancy. These results suggest that it is optimal to evaluate goal progress at the lower, subgoal level, particularly after failure feedback.
Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, & N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 37-61). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
2.
Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586-598.
3.
Brunstein, J.C. (2000). Motivation and performance following failure: The effortful pursuit of self-defining goals. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 340-356.
4.
Carver, C. (1998). Generalization, adverse events and development of depressive symptoms. Journal of Personality, 66, 607-619.
5.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
6.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Cochran, W., & Tesser, A. (1996). The "what the hell" effect: Some effects of goal proximity and goal framing on performance. In L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Striving and feeling: Interactions among goals, affect and self-regulation (pp. 99-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum .
9.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry , 11, 227-268.
10.
Dweck, C.S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
11.
Emmons, R.A. (1992). Abstract versus concrete goals: Personal striving level, physical illness, and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 292-300.
12.
King, L. (2001). The health benefits of writing about personal goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 798-807.
13.
Kruglanski, A., Shah, J., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W.Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems . Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331-378.
14.
Kuhl, J., & Baumann, N. (2000). Self-regulation and rumination: Negative affect and impaired self-accessibility. In W. J. Perrig & A. Grob (Eds.), Control of human behavior, mental processes, and consciousness: Essays in honor of the 60th birthday of August Flammer (pp. 283-305). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Latham, G., & Seijts, G. (1999). The effects of proximal and distal goals on performance on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 20, 421-429.
16.
Little, B.R. (1989). Personal projects analysis: Trivial pursuits, magnificent obsessions, and the search for coherence. In A. R. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 15-31). New York: Springer-Verlag .
17.
Manderlink, G., & Harackiewicz, J. (1984). Proximal versus distal goal setting and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 918-928.
18.
Marlatt, G.A., & Gordon, J.R. (1985). Relapse prevention: Maintenance strategies in the treatment of addictive behaviors. New York: Guilford.
Michalak, J., Klappheck, M., & Kosfelder, J. (2004). Personal goals of psychotherapy patients: The intensity and the "why" of goal-motivated behavior and their implications for the therapeutic process. Psychotherapy Research, 14, 193-209.
21.
Mikulincer, M. (1989). Causal attribution, coping strategies, and learned helplessness. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 13, 565-582.
22.
Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
23.
Oettingen, G. (1996). Positive fantasy and motivation. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 236-259). New York: Guilford.
24.
Peterson, C., & Barrett, L.C. (1987). Explanatory style and academic performance among university freshman. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53, 603-607.
25.
Powers, W.T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.
26.
Scheier, M., & Carver, C. (1988). A model of behavioral self-regulation: Translating intention into action. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21: Social psychological studies of the self: Perspectives and programs (pp. 303-346). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27.
Seligman, M.E. (1991). Learned optimism. New York : Knopf.
28.
Shah, J.Y., Kruglanski, A.W., & Friedman, R. (2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of self-regulation. In S. Spencer, S. Fein, M. Zanna, & J. Olson (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium, Vol. 9. Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (pp. 247-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Sheldon, K. (2002). The self-concordance model of healthy goal striving: When personal goals correctly represent the person. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 65-86). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
30.
Sheldon, K., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001). Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 152-165.
31.
Vallacher, R., & Wegner, D. (1987). What do people think they are doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.
32.
Vallacher, R., Wegner, D., & Somoza, M. (1989). That's easy for you to say: Action identification and speech fluency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 56, 199-208.
33.
Vallacher, R., & Wegner, D.M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 660-671.
34.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
35.
Wrosch, C., Scheier, M., Miller, G., Schulz, R., & Carver, C. (2003). Adaptive self-regulation of unattainable goals: Goal disengagement, goal reengagement, and subjective well being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1494-1508.
