Recent work has linked social dominance orientation (SDO) to ruthless, uncaring individuals who see the world as a competitive jungle. This need to “rule the jungle,” then, should become activated when high SDOs are in positions that threaten their chances of victory. In Study 1, the authors manipulated advantage and disadvantage in the form of resources; in an ensuing task, they observed higher levels of greed only among disadvantaged high SDOs. In Study 2, high SDOs with less opportunity to compete relative to others evidenced significantly more extra-effort to win, even though their effort broke the rules. In Study 3, the authors replicated this effect and demonstrated that extra-effort predicted increased beliefs in actual performance, which in turn predicted decisions to argue for a higher score. In sum, the results provide support for the notion of SDO reflecting underlying needs to compete and win at all costs.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other "authoritarian personality." Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.
4.
Arbuckle, J.L., & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user's guide. Chicago : SmallWaters Corporation.
5.
Ashwin, M. (2005). Cronos and his children: Envy and reparation. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved September 29, 2007, from http://human-nature.com/ashwin/index.html
6.
Campbell, D.T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 283-311). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
7.
Carver, C., & Scheier, M.F. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111-135.
8.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Collins, R.L. (2000). Among the better ones: Upward assimilation in social comparison. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 159-171). New York: Plenum.
10.
Cozzolino, P.J., & Snyder, M. (2008). From inequality to equality and beyond: The equal opportunity effect. Manuscript submitted for publication.
11.
Cozzolino, P.J., Staples, A.D., Meyers, L.S., & Samboceti, J. (2004). Greed, death, and values: From terror management to transcendence management theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 278-292.
12.
Deci, E.L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L., & Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: Competition and intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 79-83.
13.
Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual-process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology , 33, 41-113.
14.
Duckitt, J. (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684-696.
15.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75-93.
16.
Eibach, R.P., & Keegan, T. (2006). Free at last? Social dominance, loss aversion, and white and Black Americans' differing assessments of racial progress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 453-467.
17.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Moskowitz, G.B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 361-399). New York: Guilford.
18.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Barron, K.E., Pintrich, P.R., Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
19.
Higgins, E.T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
20.
Hull, C.L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts .
21.
Insko, C.A., Kirchner, J.L., Pinter, B., Efaw, J., & Wildschut, T. (2005). Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity as a function of trust and categorization: The paradox of expected cooperation . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 365-385.
22.
Jost, J.T., & Banaji, M.R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
23.
Jost, J., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A.W., & Sulloway, F.J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339-375.
24.
Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K.M. (2000). Of wealth and death: Materialism, mortality salience, and consumption behavior. Psychological Science, 11, 348-351.
25.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
26.
Kipnis, D. (1976). The powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Rabinowitz, J.L., & Federico, C. (1998). Ethnic identity, legitimizing ideologies, and social status: A matter of ideological asymmetry. Political Psychology, 19, 373-404.
28.
Locke, K.D. (2003). Status and solidarity in social comparison: Agentic and communal values and vertical and horizontal directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 619-631.
29.
Maass, A., Cadinu, M., Guarnieri, G., & Grasselli, A. (2003). Sexual harassment under social identity threat: The computer harassment paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 853-870.
30.
Morrison, K.R., & Ybarra, O. (2008). The effects of realistic threat and group identification on social dominance orientation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 156-163.
31.
Murray, H.A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., & Malle, B.F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763.
33.
Rabinowitz, J.L. (1999). Go with the flow or fight the power? The interactive effects of social dominance orientation and perceived injustice on support for the status quo. Political Psychology, 20, 1-24.
34.
Schimmel, S. (1993). Seven deadly sins. New York : Bantam Doubleday.
35.
Sheldon, K.M., & McGregor, H.A. (2000). Extrinsic value orientation and "the tragedy of the commons." Journal of Personality, 68, 383-411.
36.
Sidanius, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression: A social dominance perspective. In W. McGuire & S. Iyengar (Eds.), Current approaches to political psychology (pp. 183-219). Durham, NC : Duke University Press.
37.
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Federico, C.M., & Pratto, F. (2001). Legitimizing ideologies: The social dominance approach. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 307-331). New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Bobo, L. (1994). Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender: A case of invariance? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 998-1011.
40.
Waska, R. (2004). Greed and the frightening rumble of psychic hunger . American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 64, 253-266.
41.
Weber, C., & Federico, C.M. , (2007). Interpersonal attachment and patterns of ideological belief. Political Psychology, 28, 389-416.
42.
Whitley, B.E., & Lee, S.E. (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144-170.
