When searching for information, groups that are homogeneous regarding their members' prediscussion decision preferences show a strong bias for information that supports rather than conflicts with the prevailing opinion (confirmation bias). The present research examined whether homogeneous groups blindly search for information confirming their beliefs irrespective of the anticipated task or whether they are sensitive to the usefulness of new information for this forthcoming task. Results of three experiments show that task sensitivity depends on the groups' confidence in the correctness of their decision: Moderately confident groups displayed a strong confirmation bias when they anticipated having to give reasons for their decision but showed a balanced information search or even a dis confirmation bias (i.e., predominately seeking conflicting information) when they anticipated having to refute counterarguments. In contrast, highly confident groups demonstrated a strong confirmation bias independent of the anticipated task requirements.
Beckmann, J., & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224-237.
2.
Brodbeck, F.C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2007). Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model . Academy of Management Review, 32, 459-479.
3.
Canon, L.K. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information . In L. Festinger (Ed.), Conflict, decision, and dissonance (pp. 83-96). Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
4.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
5.
Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford .
6.
De Dreu, C.K.W., Nijstad, B.A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgement and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 22-49.
7.
Edwards, K., & Smith, E.E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5-24.
8.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
9.
Fischer, P., Jonas, E., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2005). Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 469-492.
10.
Freedman, J.L. (1965). Confidence, utility, and selective exposure: A partial replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 2, 778-780.
11.
Frey, D. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information . In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 41-80). New York: Academic Press.
12.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Kinney, R.F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531-542.
13.
Heath, C., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Interaction with others increases decision confidence but not decision quality: Evidence against information collection views of interactive decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 305-326.
14.
Holton, B., & Pyszczynski, T. (1989). Biased information search in the interpersonal domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 42-51.
Janis, I.L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
17.
Johnston, L. (1996). Resisting change: Information-seeking and stereotype change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 799-825.
18.
Jonas, E., Graupmann, V., & Frey, D. (2006). The influence of mood on the search for supporting versus conflicting information: Dissonance reduction as a means of mood regulation ? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 3-15.
19.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Frey, D. (2005). Giving advice or making decisions in someone else's place: The influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 977-990.
20.
Jonas, E., Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 557-571.
21.
Koehler, D.J. (1991). Explanation, imagination, and confidence in judgment . Psychological Bulletin, 110, 499-519.
22.
Koriat, A., Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1980). Reasons for confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 107-118.
23.
Kray, L.J., & Galinsky, A.D. (2003). The debiasing effect of counterfactual mind-sets: Increasing the search for disconfirmatory information in group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91, 69-81.
24.
Lavery, T.A., Franz, T.M., Winquist, J.R., & Larson, J.R. (1999). The role of information exchange in predicting group accuracy on a multiple judgment task. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 281-289.
25.
Lerner, J.S., & Tetlock, P.E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 255-275.
26.
Lundgren, S.R., & Prislin, R. (1998). Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 715-726.
27.
Mojzisch, A., Schulz-Hardt, S., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (in press). Combined effects of knowledge about others' opinions and anticipation of discussion on confirmatory information search. Small Group Research.
28.
Nemeth, C.J., & Rogers, J. (1996). Dissent and the search for information. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 67-76.
29.
Pinkley, R.L., Griffith, T.L., & Northcraft, G.B. (1995). "Fixed pie" a la mode: Information availability, information processing, and the negotiation of suboptimal agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 62, 101-112.
30.
Schein, E.H. (1968). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Industrial Management Review, 9, 1-15.
31.
Scholten, L., van Knippenberg, D., Nijstad, B.A., & De Dreu, C.K.W. (2007). Motivated information processing and group decision-making: Effects of process accountability on information processing and decision quality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 539-552.
32.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F.C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: Dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080-1093.
33.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Fago, C., & Kici, G. (1999). Selektive Informationssuche und Gruppenheterogenität: Der Einfluß verschiedener Formen der Gruppenheterogenität auf Selbstbestätigungsprozesse bei Entscheidungen [Selective information exposure and group heterogeneity: The influence of different forms of group heterogeneity on self-confirmation processes in decisions]. Gruppendynamik, 30, 161-174.
34.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Lüthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 655-669.
35.
Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M., & Frey, D. (2002). Productive conflict in group decision making: Genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 88, 563-586.
36.
Sniezek, J.A. (1992). Groups under uncertainty: An examination of confidence in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 124-155.
37.
Sniezek, J.A., & Buckley, T. (1993). Becoming more or less uncertain. In N. J. Castellan (Ed.), Individual and group decision making (pp. 87-108). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38.
Sniezek, J.A., & Henry, R.A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 1-28.
39.
Snyder, M., & White, P. (1981). Testing hypotheses about other people: Strategies of verification and falsification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 39-43.
40.
White, S.E., Dittrich, J.E., & Lang, J.R. (1980). The effects of group decision-making procedures and problem-situation complexity on implementational attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 428-440.
