A dyadic interactive aggression paradigm tested hypotheses from the General Aggression Model about how trait aggressiveness can create behaviorally hostile social environments. Pairs of college student participants competed in a modified reaction time task in which they repeatedly delivered and received each other's punishments. The trait aggressiveness of both participants influenced the punishment intensities (aggression level) set by each member of the dyad on later trials. Furthermore, there was a pattern of escalation from early to later trials. These trait aggressiveness effects (both self and partner) on later aggressive behavior were largely mediated by partner aggression levels during early trials. Results also suggested two aggressive motives—hostile and instrumental—resulted from high partner aggression during early trials and these motives partially mediated the effects of trait aggressiveness and of early trial aggression on later aggressive behavior.
Anderson, C.A., Anderson, K.B., Dorr, N., DeNeve, K.M., & Flanagan, M. (2000). Temperature and aggression. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 63-133.
2.
Anderson, C.A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, L.R., Johnson, J., Linz, D., et al. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth . Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 81-110.
3.
Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (1997). External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology , 1, 19-41.
Anderson, C.A., & Carnagey, N.L. (2004). Violent evil and the general aggression model. In A. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 168-192). New York: Guilford.
6.
Anderson, C.A., & Dill, K.E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 772-790.
7.
Anderson, C.A., Gentile, D.A., & Buckley, K.E. (2007). Violent video game effects on children and adolescents: Theory, research, and public policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
8.
Anderson, C.A., & Huesmann, L.R. (2003). Human aggression: A social-cognitive view. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 296-323). London: Sage.
9.
Anderson, C.A., Krull, D.S., & Weiner, B. (1996). Explanations: Processes and consequences. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 271-296). New York: Guilford.
10.
Anderson, C.A., Lindsay, J.J., & Bushman, B.J. (1999). Research in the psychological laboratory: Truth or triviality? Current Directions in Psychological Science , 8, 3-9.
11.
Anderson, C.A., & Murphy, C.R. (2003). Violent video games and aggressive behavior in young women. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 423-429.
12.
Anderson, K.B., Anderson, C.A., Dill, K.E., & Deuser, W.E. (1998). The interactive relations between trait hostility, pain, and aggressive thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 161-171.
13.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Bartholow, B.D., & Anderson, C.A. (2002). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Potential sex differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283-290.
15.
Bartholow, B.D., Anderson, C.A., Carnagey, N.L., & Benjamin, A.J. (2005). Interactive effects of life experience and situational cues on aggression: The weapons priming effect in hunters and nonhunters. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 48-60.
16.
Baumeister, R.F. (1988). Should we stop studying sex differences altogether ? American Psychologist, 43, 1092-1095.
17.
Bushman, B.J. (1995). Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 950-960.
18.
Bushman, B.J., & Anderson, C.A. (1998). Methodology in the study of aggression: Integrating experimental and nonexperimental findings. In R. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 23-48). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
19.
Bushman, B.J., & Anderson, C.A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy? Psychological Review, 108, 273-279.
20.
Bushman, B.J., & Huesmann, L.R. (2006). Short-term and long-term effects of violent media on aggression in children and adults. Archives of Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine, 160, 348-352.
21.
Bushman, B.J., & Wells, G.L. (1998). Trait aggressiveness and hockey penalties: Predicting hot tempers on the ice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 969-974.
22.
Buss, A.H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
23.
Buss, D.M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221.
24.
Campbell, L., & Kashy, D.A. (2002). Estimating actor, partner, and interaction effects for dyadic data using PROC MIXED and HLM: A user-friendly guide. Personal Relationships, 9, 327-342.
25.
Carlson, M., Marcus-Newhall, A., & Miller, N. (1989). Evidence for a general construct of aggression . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 377-389.
26.
Carnagey, N.L., & Anderson, C.A. (2005). The effects of reward and punishment in violent video games on aggressive affect, cognition, and behavior . Psychological Science, 16, 882-889.
27.
Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423-452.
28.
DeLisi, M. (2005). Career criminals in society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
Dill, K.E., Anderson, C.A., Anderson, K.B., & Deuser, W.E. (1997). Effects of aggressive personality on social expectations and social perceptions. Journal of Research in Personality , 31, 272-292.
30.
Giancola, P.R. (2003). The moderating effects of dispositional empathy on alcohol-related aggression in men and women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 275-281.
31.
Giancola, P.R., & Chermack, S.T. (1998). Construct validity of laboratory aggression paradigms: A response to Tedeschi and Quigley (1996). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 3, 237-253.
32.
Huesmann, L.R. (1986). Psychological processes promoting the relation between exposure to media violence and aggressive behavior by the viewer. Journal of Social Issues, 42(3), 125-139.
33.
Kashy, D.A., & Kenny, D.A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451-477). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Kelley, H.H., & Stahelski, A.J. (1970). The social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 66-91.
35.
Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York : Guilford.
36.
Kerr, J.H., & de Kock, H. (2002). Aggression, violence, and the death of a Dutch soccer hooligan: A reversal theory explanation. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 1-10.
37.
Kuhlman, D.M., & Wimberley, D.L. (1976). Expectations of choice behavior held by cooperators, competitors, and individualists across four classes of experimental game. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 69-81.
Lindsay, J.J., & Anderson, C.A. (2000). From antecedent conditions to violent actions: A general affective aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 533-547.
40.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
41.
Murphy, P., Williams, J., & Dunning, E. (1990). Football on trial: Spectator violence and development in the football world. London: Routledge.
42.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R.E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill .
43.
Rubin, J.Z., Pruitt, D.G., & Kim, S.H. (1994). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J.J. (1990). Towards reconciling personality and social psychology: A construct accessibility approach. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 531-546.
45.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W.B. (1978a). Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 148-162.
46.
Snyder, M., & Swann, W.B. (1978b). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
47.
Swann, W.B., Pelham, B.W., & Roberts, D.C. (1987). Causal chunking: Memory and inference in ongoing interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 53, 858-865.
48.
Zani, B., & Kirchler, E. (1991). When violence overshadows the spirit of sporting competition: Italian football fans and their clubs. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 5-21.
