In four studies, this article investigates the impact of situational experience on social inference. Participants without firsthand experience of a situation made more extreme and erroneous inferences about the personalities of people behaving in that situation than did participants with firsthand experience. Firsthand experience, thus, appears to diminish dispositionism in social inference because it informs people about the situational constraints that guide behavior. Across all studies, participants also displayed holier-than-thou biases, overpredicting how generously they would act relative to predictions about their peers and also relative to how they actually acted when the situation came.
Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D. (2005). Judging for two: Some connectionist proposals for how the self informs and constrains social judgment. In M. Alicke, D. Dunning, & J. Krueger (Eds.), Self and social judgment. New York: Psychology Press.
2.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Beauregard, K.S., & Dunning, D. (1998). Turning up the contrast: Self-enhancement motives prompt egocentric contrast effects in social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 606-621.
4.
Bierbrauer, G. (1979). Why did he do it? Attribution of obedience and the phenomenon of dispositional bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 67-84.
5.
Choi, I., & Nisbett, R.E. (1998). Situational salience and cultural differences in the correspondence bias and actor-observer bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 949-960.
6.
Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1-11
7.
Dunning, D. (2000). Social judgment as implicit social comparison . In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 353-378). New York: Plenum.
8.
Dunning, D. (2003). The zealous self-affirmer: How and why the self lurks so pervasively behind social judgment. In S. Fein and S. Spencer (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 45-72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Dunning, D. (2005). Self-insight: Roadblocks and detours on the path to knowing thyself. New York: Psychology Press.
10.
Dunning, D., & Beauregard, K.S. (2000). Regulating impressions of others to affirm images of the self. Social Cognition, 18, 198-222.
11.
Dunning, D., & Cohen, G.L. (1992). Egocentric definitions of traits and abilities in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 63, 341-355.
12.
Dunning, D., & Hayes, A.F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213-229.
13.
Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106.
14.
Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 79, 861-875.
15.
Epley, N., & Dunning, D. (2006). The mixed blessings of self-knowledge in behavioral prediction: Enhanced discrimination but exacerbated bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 641-655.
16.
Farwell, L., & Weiner, B. (2000). Bleeding hearts and the heartless: Popular perceptions of liberal and conservative ideologies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 845-852.
Gilovich, T., Kerr, M., & Medvec, V.H. (1993). The effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 552-560.
19.
Greenwald, A.G., Carnot, C.G., Beach, R., & Young, B. (1987). Increasing voting behavior by asking people if they expect to vote. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 315-318.
20.
Jones, E.E., & Harris, V.A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 1-2.
21.
Karniol, R., & Ross, R. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review ofPsychology , 47, 593-620.
22.
Koehler, D.J., & Poon, C.S.K. (2006). Self-predictions overweight strength of current intentions. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology , 42, 517-524.
23.
Lehrer, J. [Executive Editor and Anchor]. ( 2005, September 8). News hour with Jim Lehrer [Television broadcast] . Washington, DC: MacNeil/ Lehrer Productions.
24.
Miller, A.G., Jones, E.E., & Hinkle, S. (1981). A robust attribution error in the personality domain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 587-600.
25.
Nussbaum, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Creeping dispositionism: The temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 485-497.
26.
Osberg, T.M., & Shrauger, J.S. (1986). Self-prediction: Exploring the parameters of accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1044-1057.
27.
Ross, L., & Nisbett, R.E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill .
28.
Sherman, S.J. (1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 211-221.
29.
Snyder, M., & Jones, E.E. (1974). Attitude attribution when behavior is constrained . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 585-600.
30.
Sobel, M.E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
31.
Storms, M.D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154-164
32.
Swim, J.K., & Hyers, L.L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?! Women's public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68-88.
33.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 79, 876-889.
34.
Van Boven, L., Loewenstein, G., & Dunning, D. (2005). The illusion of courage in social predictions: Underestimating the impact of fear of embarrassment on other people. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96, 130-141.
35.
Wilson, T.D., & La Fleur, S.J. (1995). Knowing what you'll do: Effects of analyzing reasons on self-prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 21-35.
36.
Woodzicka, J.A., & LaFrance, M. (2001). Real versus imagined gender harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 15-30.
