The Figure Independence Scale (FIS) assesses people's preference for abstract figures that represent uniqueness. As psychological manifestations of cultural values cohere among each other within a cultural system, the authors argue that preference for uniqueness, as a psychological manifestation of the value for independence, can be used as an indirect measure of this value. Four studies examine the convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of the FIS. The results indicate that liking for abstract, unique figures coheres with other specific manifestations of the value for independence (i.e., responses to explicit independence scale, need for personal control, liking for independence themes in advertisements, and use of social coping) and thus can be used as a measure of individuals' more global endorsement of this individualistic value.
Adams, G. (2005). The cultural grounding of personal relationship: Enemyship in North American and West African Worlds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 948-968.
2.
Biernet, M., & Manis, M. (1994). Shifting standards and stereotype-based judgments . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 5-20.
3.
Bruner, J.S. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Carver, C.S. (1997). You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the Brief COPE. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 92-100.
5.
Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F., & Weintraub, J.K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283.
6.
Cohen, D. (2001). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications . Psychological Bulletin,127, 451-471.
7.
Durkheim, E. (1974). Sociology and philosophy. New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1924)
8.
Emmons, R.A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11—17.
9.
Farr, R.M. (1991). Individualism as a collective representation. In A. Aebischer, J. P. Deconchy, & M. Lipiansky (Eds.), Ideologies et representations sociales (pp. 129-143). Cousset (Fribourg), Switzerland: Delval.
10.
Fazio, R.H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The MODE model as an integrative framework. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 75-109). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
11.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117—140.
12.
Fiske, A.P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H.R., & Nisbett, R.E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. Gilbert & S. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 915-981). Boston: Mcgraw-Hill.
13.
Foster, J.D., Campbell, W.K., & Twenge, J.M. (2003). Individual differences in narcissism: Inflated self-views across the lifespan and around the world. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 469-486.
14.
Gardner, W.L., Gabriel, S., & Lee, A.Y. (1999). “I” value freedom, but “we” value relationships: Self-construal priming mirrors cultural differences in judgment. Psychological Science, 10, 321-326.
15.
Han, S., & Shavitt, S. (1994). Persuasion and culture: Advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 326-350.
16.
Heine, S.J., Kitayama, S., Lehman, D.R., Takata, T., Ide, E., Leung, C., et al. (2001). Divergent consequences of success and failure in Japan and North America: An investigation of self-improving motivations and malleable selves. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 81, 599-615.
17.
Heine, S.J., & Lehman, D.R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement: An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1268-1283.
18.
Heine, S.J., Lehman, D.R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903-918.
19.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Inglehart, R., & Baker, W.E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19-51.
21.
Iyengar, S.S., & Lepper, M.R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349-366.
22.
Kim, H., & Markus, H.R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77, 785-800.
23.
Kim, H.S., & Drolet, A. (2003). Choice and self-expression: A cultural analysis of variety-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 85, 373-382.
24.
Kim, H.S., & Sherman, D.K. (2007). “Express yourself”: Culture and the effect of self-expression on choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1-11.
25.
Kim, H.S., Sherman, D.K., Ko, D., & Taylor, S.E. (2006). Pursuit of happiness and pursuit of harmony: Culture, relationships, and social support seeking. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1595-1607.
26.
Kitayama, S. (2002). Culture and basic psychological processes— Toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. ( 2002). Psychological Bulletin,128, 89-96.
27.
Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K., & Ramaswamy, J. (2006). Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan's “northern frontier.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 369-384.
28.
Kitayama, S., Mesquita, B., & Karasawa, M. (2006). The emotional basis of independent and interdependent selves: Socially disengaging and engaging emotions in the US and Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 890-903.
29.
Lasch, C. (1992). The narcissistic personality of our time. In C. Donald & R. K. Fenn (Eds.), Individualism reconsidered: Readings bearing on the endangered self in modern society (pp. 295-306). Princeton, NJ: Princeton Theological Seminary.
30.
Lee, A.Y., Aaker, J.L., & Gardner, W.L. (2000). The pleasures and pains of distinct self-construals: The role of interdependence in regulatory focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1122-1134.
31.
Markus, H.R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
32.
Mesquita, B. (2001). Emotions in collectivist and individualist contexts . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 68-74.
33.
Morling, B., Kitayama, S., & Miyamoto, Y. (2002). Cultural practices emphasize influence in the United States and adjustment in Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 311-323.
34.
Oyserman, D., Coon, H.M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses . Psychological Bulletin,128, 3-72.
35.
Paulhus, D.L., & Williams, K.M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556—563.
36.
Pearlin, L.I., Menagham, E.G., Lieberman, M.A., & Mullam, J.T. (1981). The stress process. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 22, 337—356.
37.
Peng, K., Nisbett, R.E., & Wong, N.Y. (1997). Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. Psychological Methods, 2, 329-344.
38.
Raskin, R., & Hall, C.S. (1981). The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159—162.
39.
Schartz, S.H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). New York: Academic Press.
40.
Sherman, D.A., & Steele, C.M. (1999, June). The psychological experience of women on welfare: Dependence or independence? Poster presented at annual conference ofAmerican Psychological Society, Denver, CO.
41.
Singelis, T.M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 20, 580—591.
42.
Snyder, C.R., & Fromkin, H.L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 518—527.
43.
Snyder, C.R., & Fromkin, H.L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
44.
Steele, C.M., & Sherman, D.A. (1999). The psychological predicament of women on welfare . In D. Prentice & D. Miller (Eds.), Cultural divides: Understanding and overcoming group conflict (pp. 393-428). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
45.
Taylor, S.E., Sherman, D.K., Kim, H.S., Jarcho, J., Takagi, K., & Dunagan, M.S. (2004). Culture and social support: Who seeks it and why?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 354—362.
46.
Triandis, H.C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506—520.
47.
Triandis, H.C., Bontempo, R., Betancourt, H., Bond, M., Leung, K., Brenes, A., et al. (1986). The measurement of the etic aspects of individualism and collectivism across cultures. Australian Journal of Psychology, 38, 257—267.
48.
Vandello, J.A., & Cohen, D. (1999). Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 77, 279—292.
