Two studies examined motivation and content domain as possible influences on sex differences in interpersonal sensitivity. Although much research has found women to excel on tasks measuring interpersonal sensitivity, most of the tasks have measured accuracy in female-relevant domains such as emotion. The present studies measured interpersonal sensitivity, defined as accurate recall of another person, for both female-relevant and male-relevant content domains and also included motivational manipulations intended to influence men and women differently. Study 1 measured accuracy of recalling information in a written vignette about a person, and Study 2 measured accuracy of recalling details about an interaction partner. Both studies supported hypotheses about domain specificity and gender-relevant motivation. However, even for male-stereotypic content and for tasks framed to favor men's motivation to perform well, men's accuracy never exceeded women's.
Aamodt, M.G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 15, 6-11 .
2.
Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1995). On judging and being judged accurately in zero-acquaintance situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 518-529.
3.
Ames, D.R., & Kammrath, L.K. (2004). Mind-reading and metacognition: Narcissism, not actual competence, predicts self-estimated ability. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 28, 187-209.
4.
Aube, J., & Whiffen, V.E. (1996). Depressive styles and social acuity: Further evidence for distinct interpersonal correlates of dependency and self-criticism. Communication Research, 23, 407-424.
5.
Barnes, M.L., & Sternberg, R.J. (1989). Social intelligence and decoding of nonverbal cues. Intelligence, 13, 263-287.
6.
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised Version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241-251.
7.
Bauer, L.M., Kulkarni, M., & McGowan, S. (1997). Gender differences in nonverbal decoding of emotion: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University at Albany, State University of New York.
8.
Biehl, M., Matsumoto, D., Ekman, P., Hearn, V., Heider, K., Kudoh, T., et al. (1997). Matsumoto and Ekman's Japanese and Caucasian Facial Expressions of Emotion (JACFEE): Reliability data and cross-national differences. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 21, 3-21.
9.
Brackett, M.A., Rivers, S.E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: A comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 780-795.
10.
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
11.
Briton, N.J., & Hall, J.A. (1995). Beliefs about female and male nonverbal communication. Sex Roles, 32, 79-90.
12.
Brody, L.R., & Hall, J.A. (2000). Gender, emotion, and expression. In M. Lewis &J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2d ed., pp. 338-349). New York: Guilford.
13.
Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1989). Interpreting the expressive behavior of others: The Interpersonal Perception Task. Journal of NonverbalBehavior , 13, 225-245.
14.
Costanzo, M., & Archer, D. (1993). The Interpersonal Perception Task—15 (IPT-15): A guide for researchers and teachers. Berkeley: University of California Extension.
15.
Cross, S.E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender . Psychological Bulletin,122, 5-37.
16.
Dovidio, J.F., & Ellyson, S.L. (1982). Decoding visual dominance: Attributions of power based on relative percentages of looking while speaking and looking while listening. Social Psychology Quarterly, 45, 106-113.
17.
Fischer, A.H., & Manstead, A.S.R. (2000). The relation between gender and emotions in different cultures. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 71-94). Paris: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Fiske, S.T., & Morling, B. (1996). Stereotyping as a function of personal control motives and capacity constraints: The odd couple of power and anxiety. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 322-346). New York: Guilford.
19.
Galinsky, A.D., Magee, J.C., Inesi, M.E., & Gruenfeld, D.H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068-1074.
20.
Gesn, P.R., & Ickes, W. (1999). The development of meaning contexts for empathic accuracy: Channel and sequence effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 746-761.
21.
Gross, J.J., & John, O.P. (1998). Mapping the domain of expressivity: Multimethod evidence for a hierarchical model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 170-191.
22.
Hall, J.A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin,85, 845-857.
23.
Hall, J.A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24.
Hall, J.A., Halberstadt, A.G., & O'Brien, C.E. (1997). “Subordination” and nonverbal sensitivity: A study and synthesis of findings based on trait measures. Sex Roles, 37, 295-317.
25.
Hall, J.A., Murphy, N.A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 30, 141-155.
26.
Hall, J.A., Rosip, J.C., Smith LeBeau, L., Horgan, T.G., & Carter, J.D. (2006). Attributing the sources of accuracy in unequal-power dyadic communication: Who is better and why?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 18-27.
27.
Hall, J.A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2007). Sources of accuracy in the empathic accuracy paradigm. Emotion, 7, 438-446.
28.
Haviland, J.J., & Malatesta, C.Z. (1981). The development of sex differences in nonverbal signals: Fallacies, facts, and fantasies. In C. Mayo & N. M. Henley (Eds.), Gender and nonverbal behavior (pp. 183-208). New York: Springer-Verlag.
29.
Henley, N.M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Horgan, T.G., Schmid Mast, M., Hall, J.A., & Carter, J.D. (2004). Gender differences in memory for the appearance of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 185-196.
31.
Horgan, T.G., & Smith, J.L. (2006). Interpersonal reasons for interpersonal perceptions: Gender-incongruent purpose goals and nonverbal judgment accuracy. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 30, 127-140.
32.
Ickes, W. (2001). Measuring empathic accuracy. In J. A. Hall & F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 219-241). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Ickes, W., Gesn, P.R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?Personal Relationships , 7, 95-109.
34.
Iizuka, Y., Patterson, M.L., & Matchen, J.C. (2002). Accuracy and confidence on the Interpersonal Perception Task: A Japanese—American comparison. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 26, 159-174.
35.
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D.H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
36.
Klein, K.J.K., & Hodges, S.D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720-730.
37.
Koenig, A.M., & Eagly, A.H. (2005). Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity . Sex Roles, 52, 489-496.
38.
Kwon, Y. (1997). Sex, sex-role, facial attractiveness, social self-esteem and interest in clothing. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 84, 899-907.
39.
Lippa, R.A., & Dietz, J.K. (2000). The relation of gender, personality, and intelligence to judges' accuracy in judging strangers' personality from brief video segments. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 24, 25-43.
40.
Maccoby, E.E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
McClure, E.B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children, and adolescents . Psychological Bulletin,126, 424-453.
42.
Murphy, N.A., Hall, J.A., & Colvin, C.R. (2003). Accurate intelligence assessments in social interactions: Mediators and gender effects. Journal of Personality, 71, 466-493.
43.
Nowicki, S., Jr., & Duke, M.P. (1994). Individual differences in the nonverbal communication of affect: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy Scale. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 9-35.
44.
Pitterman, H., & Nowicki, S., Jr. (2004). A test of the ability to identify emotion in human standing and sitting postures: The Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy—2 Posture Test (DANVA2-POS). Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 130, 146-162.
45.
Rosenthal, R., Hall, J.A., DiMatteo, M.R., Rogers, P.L., & Archer, D. (1979). Sensitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
46.
Rosip, J.C., & Hall, J.A. (2004). Knowledge of nonverbal cues, gender, and nonverbal decoding accuracy. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 28, 267-286.
47.
Saenz, D.S. (1994). Token status and problem-solving deficits: Detrimental effects of distinctiveness and performance monitoring. Social Cognition, 12, 61-74.
48.
Scherer, K.R., Banse, R., & Wallbott, H.G. (2001). Emotion inferences from vocal expression correlate across languages and cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 76-92.
49.
Schmid Mast, M. (2004). Men are hierarchical, women are egalitarian: An implicit gender stereotype. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 63, 107-111.
50.
Schmid Mast, M. (2005). Interpersonal hierarchy expectation: Introduction of a new construct. Journal of Personality Assessment, 84, 287-295.
51.
Schmid Mast, M., & Hall, J.A. (2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of NonverbalBehavior, 28, 145-165.
52.
Schmid Mast, M., & Hall, J.A. (2006). Women's advantage at remembering others' appearance: A systematic look at the why and when of a gender difference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 353-364.
53.
Schmid Mast, M., Hall, J.A., Murphy, N.A., & Colvin, C.R. (2003). Judging assertiveness. Facta Universitatis , 2, 731-744.
54.
Schmid Mast, M., & Jonas, K. (2007). It's power that makes you interpersonally sensitive! Unpublished manuscript.
55.
Snodgrass, S.E., Hecht, M.A., & Ploutz-Snyder, R. (1998). Interpersonal sensitivity: Expressivity or perceptivity?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 238-249.
56.
Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1975). Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 29-39.
57.
Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G.J.O. (2003). Mind-reading accuracy in intimate relationships: Assessing the roles of the relationship, the target, and the judge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 85, 1079-1094.
58.
Tresselt, M.E., & Mayzner, M.S. (1966). Normative solution times for a sample of 134 solution words and 378 associated anagrams. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements , 1, 293-298.
59.
Twenge, J.M. (2001). Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.
60.
Vogt, D.S., & Colvin, C.R. (2003). Interpersonal orientation and the accuracy of personality judgments. Journal of Personality, 71, 268-295.
61.
Woods, E. (1996). Associations of nonverbal decoding ability with indices of person-centered communicative ability. Communication Reports, 9, 13-22.
62.
Zuckerman, M., & Larrance, D.T. (1979). Individual differences in perceived encoding and decoding abilities. In R. Rosenthal (Ed.), Skill in nonverbal communication: Individual differences (pp. 171-203). Cambridge, MA: Oelgeschlager, Gunn & Hain.
