Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2007-11
Intergroup Threat and Experienced Affect: The Distinct Roles of Causal Attributions,Ingroup Identification,and Perceived Legitimacy of Intergroup Status
Across three studies, it was predicted and found that in the case of intergroup threat, low ingroup identifiers experience greater negative affect when they make an ingroup-internal rather than an outgroup-internal attribution, and high ingroup identifiers experience greater negative affect when they make an outgroup-internal rather than an ingroup-internal attribution. These effects were mediated by the perceived legitimacy of ingroup— outgroup status differences that results from their reflecting social reality (i.e., actual differences in the groups' standing on a relevant comparison dimension). Combining the findings of two distinct literatures, the current work provides new insights into the yet-unexplored distinct roles played by intergroup attributions as a predictor and ingroup identification as a moderator of the affective responses produced by social identity threat.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Arnkelsson, G.B., & Smith, W.P. (2000). The impact of stable and unstable attributes on ability assessment in social comparison. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 936-947.
3.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
4.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Barreto, E., & Ellemers, N. (2003). The effects of being categorized: The interplay between internal and external social identities. European Review of Social Psychology, 14, 139-170.
6.
Bizman, A., Yinon, Y., & Krotman, S. (2001). Group-based emotional distress: An extension of self-discrepancy theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1291-1300.
7.
Branscombe, N.R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat . In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford , UK: Basil Blackwell.
8.
Breakwell, G.M. (1986). Coping with threatened identities. New York: Methuen.
9.
Cadinu, M., & Reggiori, C. (2002). Discrimination of a low-status outgroup: The role of ingroup threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 501-515.
10.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1969). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multi-trait multi-method matrix. Psychological Bulletin,56, 81-105.
11.
Collins, R.L. (1996). For better or worse: The impact of upward social comparison on self-evaluation. Psychological Bulletin,119, 51-69.
12.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist , 39, 105-116.
13.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one's group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
14.
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
15.
Doosje, B., Spears, R., & Koomen, ( 1995). When bad isn't all bad: The strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655.
16.
Ellemers, N., & Barreto, E. (2001). The impact of relative group status: Affective, perceptual, and behavioral consequences. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 324-343). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
17.
Ellemers, N., Barreto, E., & Spears, R., (1999). Commitment and strategic responses to social context . In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 127-146). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
18.
Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review ofPsychology, 53, 161-186.
19.
Ellemers, N., Van Rijswijk, W., Roefs, M., & Simons, C. (1997). Bias in intergroup perceptions: Balancing group identity with social reality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 186-198.
20.
Ellemers, N., Wilke, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1993). Effects of the legitimacy of low group or individual status on individual and collective identity and enhancement strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 758-766.
21.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
Hewstone, M. (1990). The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup causal attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 311-335.
23.
Hewstone, M., & Jaspars, J. (1982). Intergroup relations and attribution processes . In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Higgins, E.T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect . Psychological Review, 94, 319-340.
25.
Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-240.
26.
Kelley, H.H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
27.
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. BiologicalPsychiatry, 44, 1248-1263.
28.
McFarland, C., & Ross, M. (1982). Impact of causal attributions on affective reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 937-946.
29.
Miller, D.M., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213-225.
30.
Mueller, D., Judd, C.J., & Yzerbyt, V.Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
31.
Ouwerkerk, J., & Ellemers, N. (2002). The benefits of being disadvantaged: Performance-related circumstances and consequences of intergroup comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 73-91.
32.
Stangor, C., and Ford, T.E. (1992). Accuracy and expectancy-confirming processing orientations and the development of stereotypes and prejudice. European Review of Social Psychology, 3, 57-89.
33.
Schmitt, M.T., & Branscombe, N.R. (2002). The meaning and consequences of perceived discrimination on disadvantaged and privileged social groups . European Review of Social Psychology, 12, 167-199.
34.
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
35.
Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1989). The social context of stereotyping and differentiation. European Journal of Social Psychology , 19, 101-121.
36.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W.G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior . In S. Austin & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall .
38.
Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude behavior relationship. A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 776-793.
39.
Trafimow, D., Bromgard, I.K., Finlay, K.A., & Ketelaar, T. (2005). The role of affect in determining the attributional weight of immoral behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 935-948.
40.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
41.
Watson, D., Clark, L.A., & Tellegen, L.G. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063-1070.
42.
Weber, U., Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2002). Perceived legitimacy of intergroup status differences: Its prediction by relative ingroup prototipicality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 449-470.
43.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement, motivation, and emotion. Psychological Review, 4, 548-573.
44.
Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion . New York: Springer-Verlag.
45.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
46.
Weiner, B., Russell, D., & Lerman, D. (1979). The cognition-emotion process in achievement-related contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1211-1220.
