A regulatory perspective on trait anger suggests that low-trait-anger individuals may recruit limited-capacity cognitive control resources following the activation of hostile thoughts. Because no prior studies directly examine such processes, the present studies seek to do so. Study 1 reveals that a simple word-evaluation paradigm can be used to examine individual differences in hostile reactivity, in that high-trait-anger individuals display more pronounced tendencies to evaluate words negatively following a hostile prime. Studies 2-4 examine a cognitive control account of such findings. Study 2 finds that time-limiting evaluations eliminate trait-linked differences in evaluative priming. Studies 3 and 4 find that low-trait-anger individuals display deficits on a secondary task immediately following the activation of a hostile thought. All studies, then, converge on the link between low trait anger and the spontaneous recruitment of limited-capacity cognitive control resources following hostile primes.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Amodio, D.M., Kubota, J.T., Harmon-Jones, E., & Devine, P.G. (2006). Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs. external cues. Scan, 1, 26-36.
3.
Anderson, C.A., & Carnagey, N.L. (2004). Violent evil and the general aggression model. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The social psychology of good and evil (pp. 168-192). New York: Guilford.
4.
Bargh, J.A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford.
5.
Bargh, J.A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Bettencourt, B.A., Talley, A., Benjamin, A.J., & Valentine, J. (2006). Personality and aggressive behavior under provoking and neutral conditions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 751-777.
7.
Blair, R.J.R. (2004). The roles of orbital frontal cortex in the modulation of antisocial behavior. Brain andCognition, 55, 198-208.
8.
Botvinick, M.M., Cohen, J.D., & Carter, C.S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 539-546.
9.
Buss, A.H. & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
10.
Cervone, D., & Shoda, Y. (1999). The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization. New York: Guilford.
11.
Cohen, B.H. (2001). Explaining psychological statistics. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Crick, N.R., & Dodge, K.A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin,115, 74-101.
14.
Deffenbacher, J.L. (1992). Trait anger: Theory, findings, and implications . In C. D. Spielberger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 9, pp. 177-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15.
Dougherty, D.D., Rauch, S.L., Deckersbach, T., Marci, C., Loh, R., Shin, L.M., et al. (2004). Ventromedial prefrontal cortex and amygdala dysfunction during an anger induction positron emission tomography study in patients with major depressive disorder with anger attacks. Archives of General Psychiatry,61, 795-804.
16.
Eckhardt, C., Norlander, B., & Deffenbacher, J. (2004). The assessment of anger and hostility: A critical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior , 9, 17-43.
17.
Eisenberger, N.I., & Lieberman, M.D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294-300.
18.
Eisenberger, N.I., Lieberman, M.D., & Satpute, A.B. (2005). Personality from a controlled processing perspective: An fMRI study of neuroticism, extraversion, and self-consciousness. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 169-181.
19.
Epps, J., & Kendall, P.C. (1995). Hostile attribution bias in adults. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 159-178.
20.
Everling, S., & Fischer, B. (1998). The antisaccade: A review of basic research and clinical studies. Neuropsychologia, 36, 885-899.
21.
Gottsdanker, R., & Way, T.C. (1966). Varied and constant intersignal intervals in psychological refractoriness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 792-804.
22.
Graham, S., Hudley, C., & Williams, E. (1992). Attributional and emotional determinants of aggression among African-American and Latino young adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 28, 731-740.
23.
Hariri, A.R., Bookheimer, S.Y., & Mazziotta, J.C. (2000). Modulating emotional responses: Effects of a neocortical network on the limbic system. NeuroReport , 11, 43-48.
24.
Holroyd, C.B., & Coles, M.G.H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679-709.
25.
Karlin, L., & Kestenbaum, R. (1968). Effects of number of alternatives on the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 167-178.
26.
Lieberman, M.D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review ofPsychology, 58, 259-289.
27.
Lieberman, M.D. & Eisenberger, N.I. (2005). Conflict and habit: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to the self. In A. Tesser, J. V. Wood, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), On building, defending and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 77-102). New York: Psychology Press.
28.
Lieberman, M.D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D.T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 199-249.
29.
Logan, G.D., & Zbrodoff, N.J. (1982). Constraints on strategy construction in a speeded discrimination task. Journal of ExperimentalPsychology, 8, 502-520.
30.
Martin, R., Watson, D., & Wan, C.K. (2000). A three-factor model of trait anger: Dimensions of affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality , 68, 869-897.
31.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool system analysis of delay of gratification: Dynamics of willpower. Psychological Review, 106, 3-19.
32.
Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268.
33.
Moskowitz, G.B., & Skurnik, I.W. (1999). Contrast effects as determined by the type of prime: Trait versus exemplar primes initiate processing strategies that differ in how accessible constructs are used. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 911-927.
34.
Neely, J.H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In D. Besner & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 264-336). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Ochsner, K.N., & Gross, J.J. (2004). Thinking makes it so: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to emotion regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 229-255). New York: Guilford.
36.
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
37.
Pashler, H., & Johnston, J.C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
38.
Posner, M.I., & Raichle, M.E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Scientific American Library.
39.
Robinson, M.D. (in press). Lives lived in milliseconds: Using cognitive methods in personality research. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology . New York: Guilford.
40.
Rusting, C.L., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1998). Regulating responses to anger: Effects of rumination and distraction on angry mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 790-803.
41.
Schützwohl, A., & Reisenzein, R. (1999). Children's and adults' reactions to a schema-discrepant event: A developmental analysis of surprise . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23, 37-62.
42.
Shelton, J.R., & Martin, R.C. (1992). How semantic is automatic semantic priming?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1191-1210.
43.
Shiffrin, R.M., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: II. Perception, learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127-190.
44.
Smith, T.W., Glazer, K., Ruiz, J.M., & Gallo, L.C. (2004). Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: An interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health . Journal of Personality, 72, 1217-1270.
45.
Stapel, D.A., Martin, L.L., & Schwartz, N. (1998). The smell of bias: What instigates correction processes in social judgments? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 797-806.
46.
Thompson, E.P., Roman, R.J., Moskowitz, G.B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J.A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474-489.
47.
Wegener, D.T., & Petty, R.E. (1995). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: The role of naïve theories in corrections for perceived bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 36-51.
48.
Wenzel, A., & Rubin, D.C. (2005). Cognitive methods and their application to clinical research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
49.
Wilkowski, B.M., & Robinson, M.D. (2007). Toward a social cognitive theory of individual differences in anger and anger-related aggression. Manuscript submitted for publication.
50.
Wilkowski, B.M., & Robinson, M.D. (in press). The spatial priming of negative affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology.
51.
Wilkowski, B.M., Robinson, M.D., Gordon, R.D., & Troop-Gordon, W. (in press). Tracking the evil eye: Trait anger and selective attention within ambiguously hostile scenes. Journal of Research in Personality.
52.
Wilkowski, B.M., Robinson, M.D., & Meier, B.P. (2006). Agreeableness and the prolonged spatial processing of antisocial and prosocial information. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 1152-1168.
53.
Zbrodoff, N.J., & Logan, G.D. (1986). On the autonomy of mental processes: A case study of arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 115, 118-130.
54.
Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J.R. (1976). Effect of timing of information about mitigating circumstances on emotional responses to provocation and retaliatory behavior . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 38-55.
