The authors investigated whether students who selectively volunteer for a study of prison life possess dispositions associated with behaving abusively. Students were recruited for a psychological study of prison life using a virtually identical newspaper ad as used in the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE; Haney, Banks & Zimbardo, 1973) or for a psychological study, an identical ad minus the words of prison life. Volunteers for the prison study scored significantly higher on measures of the abuse-related dispositions of aggressiveness, authoritarianism, Machiavellianism, narcissism, and social dominance and lower on empathy and altruism, two qualities inversely related to aggressive abuse. Although implications for the SPE remain a matter of conjecture, an interpretation in terms of person-situation interactionism rather than a strict situationist account is indicated by these findings. Implications for interpreting the abusiveness of American military guards at Abu Ghraib Prison also are discussed.
Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
2.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada : University of Manitoba Press.
3.
Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Aries, E.J., Gold, C., & Weigel, R.H. (1983). Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 779-786.
5.
Blass, T. (1991). Understanding behavior in the Milgram obedience experiment: The role of personality, situations, and their interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 398-413.
6.
Browning, C.R. (1992). Ordinary men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the final solution in Poland. New York: HarperCollins.
7.
Bushman, B.J., & Baumeister, R.F. (2002). Does self-love or self-hate lead to violence?Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 543-545.
8.
Buss, A.H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
9.
Christie, R., & Geis, F.L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Cookson, C. (2004, July 2). Abu Ghraib brings a cruel reawakening . Financial Times, p. 13.
11.
Coye, R.W. (1985). Characteristics of participants and non-participants in experimental research. Psychological Reports, 56, 19-25.
12.
Cromwell, P.F., Marks, A., Olson, J.N., & Avary, D.W. (1991). Group effects on decision-making by burglars. Psychological Reports, 69, 579-588.
13.
Davis, M.H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113-126.
14.
Davis, M.H., Mitchell, K.V., Hall, J.A., Lothert, J., Snapp, T., & Meyer, M. (1999). Empathy, expectations, and situational preferences: Personality influences on the decision to participate in volunteer helping behaviors. Journal of Personality, 67, 469-503.
15.
Dollinger, S.J., & Leong, F.T. (1993). Volunteer bias and the five-factor model. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 127, 29-36.
16.
Elms, A.C., & Milgram, S. (1966). Personality characteristics associated with obedience and defiance toward authoritative command. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 1, 282-289.
17.
Emmons, R.A., Diener, E., & Larsen, R.J. (1986). Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 815-826.
18.
Eron, L.D., & Huessmann, L.R. (1984). The relation of prosocial behavior to the development of aggression and psychopathology. Aggressive Behavior, 10, 201-211.
Haney, C., Banks, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1973). Interpersonal dynamics in a simulated prison. International Journal of Criminology and Penology, 1, 69-97.
21.
Haney, C., & Zimbardo, P. (1998). The past and future of U.S. prison policy: Twenty-five years after the Stanford prison experiment. American Psychologist , 53, 709-727.
22.
Haritos-Fatouros, M. (1988). The official torturer: A learning model for obedience to the authority of violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology , 18, 1107-1120.
23.
Harrison, P.M., & Beck, A.J. (2005). Prison and jail inmates at midyear 2004. Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin. U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved May 2, 2005, from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/pjim04.pdf
24.
Haslam, S.A., & Reicher, S. (2006). Debating the psychology of tyranny: Fundamental issues of theory, perspective and science. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 55-64.
25.
Hobfoll, S.E. (1980). Personal characteristics of the college volunteer . American Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 503-506.
26.
Huggins, M.K., Haritos-Fatouros, M., & Zimbardo, P.G. (2002). Violence workers: Police torturers and murderers reconstruct Brazilian atrocities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
27.
Ickes, W., Snyder, M., & Garcia, S. (1997). Personality influences on the choice of situations . In R. Hogan, J. A. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 165-195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
Joe, V.C., Jones, R.N., & Ryder, S. (1977). Conservatism, openness to experience and sample bias. Journal of Personality Assessment, 41, 527-531.
29.
Jolliffe, D. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441-476.
30.
Kenrick, D.T., & Funder, D.C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
31.
Lifton, R.J. (1973). Home from the war. New York : Simon & Schuster.
32.
Lyon, D., & Greenberg, J. (1991). Evidence of codependence in women with an alcoholic parent: Helping out Mr. Wrong. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 435-439.
33.
McFarland, S. (2005). On the eve of war: Authoritarianism, social dominance, and American students' attitudes toward attacking Iraq. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 360-367.
34.
McHoskey, J.W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192-210.
35.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
36.
Myers, D.G. (2002). Psychology (7th ed.). New York: Worth.
37.
Myers, D.G., & Lamm, H. (1976). The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin,83, 602-627.
38.
Nelson, H. (n.d.). AR 15-6 Investigation: Allegations of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib. Psychological Assessment. Retrieved May 10, 2005, from http://www.publicintegrity.org/printer-friendly.aspx?aid=417
Raskin, R.N., & Hall, C.S. (1981). The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternative form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159-162.
41.
Reese, D. (2004). Untitled testimony to the AR 15-6 investigation: Allegations of detainee abuse at Abu Ghraib. Retrieved May 11, 2005, from http://www.publicintegrity.org/docs/AbuGhraib/Abu10.pdf
42.
Reicher, S., & Haslam, S.A. (2004). Why not everyone is a torturer. BBC News. Retrieved January 30, 2006, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/3700209.stm
43.
Reicher, S., & Haslam, S.A. (2006). Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 1-40.
44.
Rushton, J.P. (1984). The altruistic personality: Evidence from laboratory, naturalistic, and self-report perspectives. In E. Staub, D. Bar-Tal, J. Karylowski, & J. Reykowski (Eds.), Development and maintenance of prosocial behavior . New York: Plenum.
45.
Saunders, D.M., Fisher, W.A., Hewitt, E.C., & Clayton, J.P. (1985). A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: Recruitment procedures and responses to erotica. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1703-1712.
46.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. New York : Cambridge University Press.
47.
Smith, K.D. (1992). Trait sympathy and perceived control as predictors of entering sympathy-arousing situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 207-216.
48.
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
Tajfel, H. (Ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Thomas, D.A. (1989). Measuring volunteers for exciting psychology experiments with the Sensation-Seeking Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment , 53, 790-801.
51.
Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
52.
Washburn, J.J., McMahon, S.D., King, C.A., Reinecke, M.A., & Silver, C. (2004). Narcissistic features in young adolescents: Relations to aggression and internalizing symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 247-260.
53.
Wells, C. (2004, May 17). Why did they do it? Are those charged with abuse a few bad apples, or are they just like the rest of us?Time, 163, 38-42.
54.
White, M.J., & Gerstein, L.H. (1987). Helping: The influence of anticipated social sanctions and self-monitoring. Journal of Personality, 55, 41-54.
55.
Zernike, K. (2005, May 10). Behind failed Abu Ghraib plea, a tale of breakups and betrayal. The New York Times, p. A1.
56.
Zimbardo, P.G. (1975). Transforming experimental research into advocacy for social change. In M. Deutsch & H. Hornstein (Eds.), Applying social psychology: Implications for research, practice, and training (pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
Zimbardo, P.G. (1989). Quiet rage: The Stanford prison study video. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
58.
Zimbardo, P.G. (1995). The psychology of evil: A situationist perspective on recruiting good people to engage in anti-social acts. JapaneseJournal of Social Psychology, 11, 125-133.
59.
Zimbardo, P.G. (2004, May 9). Power turns good soldiers into “bad apples.” Boston Globe, p. D11.
60.
Zimbardo, P.G. (2006). On the psychology of imprisonment: Alternative perspectives from the laboratory and TV studio. British Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 47-54.
61.
Zimbardo, P.G., Maslach, C., & Haney, C. (2000). Reflections on the Stanford prison experiment: Genesis, transformations, consequences. In T. Blass (Ed.), Obedience to authority: Current perspectives on the Milgram paradigm (pp. 193-237). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62.
Zuckerman, M. (1975). Belief in a just world and altruistic behavior . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 972-976.
