The present research examined how actionversus state-oriented individuals (Kuhl & Beckmann, 1994) utilize their working memory capacity under varying situational demands. Participants visualized either a demanding or an accepting person, after which their working memory capacity was assessed. Among action-oriented participants, visualizing a demanding person led to greater operation spans (Study 1) and superior memory for intention-related information (Study 2) than visualizing an accepting person. State-oriented participants displayed the opposite pattern, such that visualizing an accepting person led to greater operation spans (Study 1) and superior memory for intentions (Study 2) than visualizing a demanding person. These findings indicate that action versus state orientation moderates the impact of situational demands on working memory capacity.
Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224-237.
2.
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
Baldwin, M. W., Carrell, S. E., & Lopez, D. F. (1990). Priming relationship schemas: My advisor and the Pope are watching me from the back of my mind. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 435-454.
4.
Baldwin, M. W., & Sinclair, L. (1996). Self-esteem and “if... then” contingencies of interpersonal acceptance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1130-1141.
5.
Baumann, N., Kaschel, R., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Affect regulation and motive-incongruent achievement goals: Antecedents of subjective well-being and symptom formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 781-799.
6.
Baumeister, R. F. (1984). Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 610-620.
7.
Blascovich, J., & Mendes, B. (2000). Challenge and threat appraisals: The role of affective cues. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59-82). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624-652.
9.
Braver, T. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2000). On the control of control: The role of dopamine in regulating prefrontal function and working memory. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance XVIII: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 713-737). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 151-179.
11.
Diefendorff, J. M. (2004). Examination of the roles of action-state orientation and goal orientation in the goal-setting and performance process. Human Performance, 17, 375-395.
12.
Diefendorff, J. M., Lord, R. G., Hepburn, E. T., Quickle, J. S., Hall, R. J., & Sanders, R. E. (1998). Perceived self-regulation and individual differences in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 4, 228-247.
13.
Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 343-353.
14.
Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
15.
Engle, R. W., Kane, M. J., & Tuholski, S. W. (1999). Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control(pp. 102-134). New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Eysenck, M. W., & Calvo, M. G. (1992) Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409-434.
17.
Feldman Barrett, L., Tugade, M. M., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Individual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 553-573.
18.
Fitzsimons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A. (2003). Thinking of you: Nonconscious goals associated with relationships partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 148-164.
19.
Fuster, J. M. (1995). Memory and planning: Two temporal perspectives of frontal lobe function. In H. H. Jasper, S. Riggio, & P. S. Goldman-Rakic (Eds.), Epilepsy and the functional anatomy of the frontal lobe (pp. 9-18). New York: Raven.
20.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1996). The volitional benefits of planning. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 287-312). New York: Guilford.
21.
Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211-1226.
22.
Heckhausen, H., & Strang, H. (1988). Efficiency under record performance demands: Exertion control—an individual difference variable?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 489-498.
23.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Idson, L. C., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
25.
Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2006). On the regulation of cognitive control: Action orientation moderates the impact of situational demands in Stroop interference tasks. Manuscript under review, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
26.
Jostmann, N. B., Koole, S. L., Van der Wulp, N. Y., & Fockenberg, D. A. (2005). Subliminal affect regulation: The moderating role of action versus state orientation. European Psychologist, 10, 209-217.
27.
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47-70.
28.
Kazén, M., & Kuhl, J. (2005). Intention memory and achievement motivation: Volitional facilitation and inhibition as a function of affective contents of need-related stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 426-448.
29.
Klein, K., & Boals, A. (2001). The relationship of life event stress and working memory capacity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 565-579.
30.
Koole, S. L. (2003). [Action versus state orientation among 1,457 Dutch college students]. Unpublished dataset, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
31.
Koole, S. L. (2005). [Action versus state orientation, and promotion versus prevention focus]. Unpublished data set, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
32.
Koole, S. L., & Jostmann, N. B. (2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 974-990.
33.
Koole, S. L., Kuhl, J., Jostmann, N. B., & Finkenauer, C. (2006). Selfregulation in interpersonal relationships: The case of action versus state orientation. In K. D. Vohs & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes (pp. 360-383). New York: Guilford.
34.
Koole, S. L., Kuhl, J., Jostmann, N. B., & Vohs, K. D. (2005). On the hidden benefits of state orientation: Can people prosper without efficient affect regulation skills? In A. Tesser, J. Woods, & D. A. Stapel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 217-244). New York: Psychology Press.
35.
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
36.
Kuhl, J. (1994). Action versus state orientation: Psychometric properties of the Action Control Scale (ACS-90). In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 47-59). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
37.
Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and selfregulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation (pp. 111-169). San Diego, CA: Academic.
38.
Kuhl, J. (2001). Motivation und Persönlichkeit: Interaktionen psychischer Systeme [Motivation and personality: Personality Systems Interactions]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
39.
Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J. (1994). Volition and personality: Action versus state orientation. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
40.
Kuhl, J., & Helle, P. (1986). Motivational and volitional determinants of depression: The degenerated-intention hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Behavior, 95, 247-251.
41.
Kuhl, J., & Kazén, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382-399.
42.
Kvavilashvili, L. (1987). Remembering intentions as a distinct form of memory. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 507-518.
43.
Lorist, M. M., Boksem, M. A. S., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2005). Impaired cognitive control and reduced cingulate activity during mental fatigue. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 199-205.
44.
McClelland, D. C., Koestner, R., & Weinberger, J. (1989). How do selfattributed and implicit motives differ?Psychological Review, 96, 690-702.
45.
Miyake, A., & Shah P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Moskowitz, G. B., Li, P., & Kirk, E. R. (2004). The implicit volition model: On the preconscious regulation of temporarily adopted goals. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 34, pp. 317-414). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
47.
Pollack, I. (1970). A nonparametric procedure for evaluation of true and false positives. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 2, 155-156.
48.
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
49.
Reason, J., & Mycielska, K. (1982). Absent-minded? The psychology of mental lapses and everyday errors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
50.
Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452.
51.
Schmeichel, B. J., Vohs, K. D., & Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Intellectual performance and ego depletion: Role of the self in logical reasoning and other information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 33-46.
52.
Shah, J. Y. (2003). The motivational looking glass: How significant others implicitly affect goal appraisals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 424-439.
53.
Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Friedman, R. (2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of selfregulation. In S. J. Spencer & S. Fein (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology(pp. 247-275). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (1994). Choice of decision-making strategies and action versus state orientation. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Volition and personality (pp. 167-176). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
55.
Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent?Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 127-154.
56.
Van der Linden, D., Frese, M., & Meijman, T. F. (2003). Mental fatigue and the control of cognitive processes: Effects on perseveration and planning. Acta Psychologica, 113, 454-465.
57.
Vohs, K. D., & Finkel, E. J. (2006). Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. New York: Guilford.
58.
Zwaan, R. A., & Truitt, T. P. (1998). Smoking urges affect language processing. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 325-330.
