Three experiments investigated the effect of consensus information on majority and minority influence. Experiment 1 examined the effect of consensus expressed by descriptive adjectives (large vs. small) on social influence. A large source resulted in more influence than a small source, irrespective of source status (majority vs. minority). Experiment 2 showed that large sources affected attitudes heuristically, whereas only a small minority instigated systematic processing of the message. Experiment 3 manipulated the type of consensus information, either in terms of descriptive adjectives (large, small) or percentages (82%, 18%, 52%, 48%). When consensus was expressed in terms of descriptive adjectives, the findings of Experiments 1 and 2 were replicated (large sources were more influential than small sources), but when consensus was expressed in terms of percentages, the majority was more influential than the minority, irrespective of group consensus.
Arbuthnot, J., & Wayner, M. (1982). Minority influence: Effects of size, conversion, and sex. Journal of Psychology, 111, 285-295.
2.
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 177-190). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Press.
3.
Baker, S. M., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source-position imbalance as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 5-19.
4.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Bohner, G., Frank, S., & Erb, H. P. (1998). Heuristic processing of distinctiveness information in minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 855-860.
6.
Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A metaanalysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 11-137.
7.
Campbell, J. D., & Fairey, P. J. (1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 457-468.
8.
Carlston, D. E. (1977). Effects of polling order on social influence in decision-making groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 40, 115-123.
9.
Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.
10.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
11.
Crano, W. D., & Chen, X. (1998). The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1437-1450.
12.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & De Vries, N. K. (1993). Numerical support, information processing and attitude change. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 647-663.
13.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study in normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
14.
De Vries, N. K., De Dreu, C. K. W., Gordijn, E., & Schuurman, M. (1996). Majority and minority influence: A dual interpretation. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 145-172). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
15.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
16.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
17.
Fiedler, K., & Semin, G. R. (1988). On the causal information conveyed by different interpersonal verbs: The role of implicit sentence context. Social Cognition, 6, 21-39.
18.
Gardikiotis, A., Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2004). The representation of majorities and minorities in the British Press: A content analytic approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 637-646.
19.
Gardikiotis, A., Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (in press). The impact of source consensus on majority and minority influence. In R. Martin & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes and consequences. Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
20.
Gerard, H. B., Wilhelmy, R. A., & Conolley, E. S. (1968). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 79-82.
21.
Goldberg, S. C. (1954). Three situational determinants of conformity to social norms. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 325-329.
22.
Insko, C.A., Drenan, S., Solomon, M.R., Smith, R., & Wade, T.J. (1983). Conformity as a function of the consistency of positive self-evaluation with being liked and being right. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 341-358.
23.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
24.
Kidd, J. S. (1958). Social influence phenomena in a task-oriented group situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 56, 13-17.
25.
Kishida, M. (1956). A study of the effects of group norm upon the change of opinions. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 56, 13-17.
26.
Lascu, D. N., Bearden, W. O., & Rose, R. L. (1995). Norm extremity and interpersonal influences on consumer conformity. Journal of Business Research, 32, 201-212.
27.
Latané, B., & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review, 88, 438-453.
28.
Maass, A., & Clark, R. D. (1984). Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 428-450.
29.
Maass, A., Salvi, D., Arcuri, L., & Semin, G. (1989). Language use in intergroup contexts: The linguistic intergroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 981-993.
30.
Maass, A., West, S. G., & Cialdini, R. B. (1987). Minority influence and conversion. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 55-79). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Mackie, D. M. (1987). Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 41-52.
32.
Martin, R., Gardikiotis, A., & Hewstone, M. (2002). Levels of consensus and majority and minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 645-665.
33.
Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Determinants and consequences of cognitive processes in majority and minority influence. In J. Forgas & K. Williams (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 315-330). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
34.
Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003a). Majority versus minority influence: When, not whether, source status instigates heuristic or systematic processing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 313-330.
35.
Martin, R., & Hewstone, M. (2003b). Social influence processes of control and change: Conformity, obedience to authority, and innovation. In M. A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 347-366). London: Sage.
36.
Martin, R., Hewstone, M., & Martin, P. Y. (2003). Resistance to persuasive messages as a function of majority and minority source status. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 585-593.
37.
Moscovici, S. (1976). Social influence and social change. London: Academic Press.
38.
Moscovici, S. (1980). Toward a theory of conversion behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 13, pp. 209-239). New York: Academic Press.
39.
Moscovici, S., & Nemeth, C. (1974). Social influence II: Minority influence. In C. Nemeth (Ed.), Social psychology: Classic and contemporary integrations (pp. 217-249). Chicago: Rand McNally.
40.
Mugny, G., & Papastamou, S. (1980). When rigidity does not fail: Individualization and psychologization as resistances to the diffusion of minority innovations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 43-61.
41.
Mullen, B. (1983). Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 295-322.
42.
Nemeth, C. J., Wachtler, J., & Endicott, J. (1977). Increasing the size of the minority: Some gains and some losses. European Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 15-27.
43.
Nordholm, L. A. (1975). Effects of group size and stimulus ambiguity on conformity. Journal of Social Psychology, 97, 123-130.
44.
The Oxford dictionary and thesaurus. (1997). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
45.
Papastamou, S. (1986). Psychologization and processes of minority and majority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 16, 165-180.
46.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
47.
Petty, R. E., & Wegner, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford.
48.
Reis, H. T., Earing, B., Kent, A., & Nezlek, J. (1976). The tyranny of numbers: Does group size affect petition signing?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6, 228-234.
49.
Rosenberg, L. (1961). Group size, prior experience, and conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 436-437.
50.
Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 190-207.
51.
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1988). The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 558-568.
52.
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1-30). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
53.
Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (Eds.). (1996). Applied social psychology. London: Sage.
54.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 290-312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
Tanford, S., & Penrod, S. (1984). Social influence model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 189-225.
56.
Tindale, R.S., Davis, J.H., Vollrath, D.A., Nagao, D.H., & Hinsz, V.B. (1990). Asymmetrical social influence in freely interacting groups: A test of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 438-449.
57.
Wilder, D. A. (1977). Perception of groups, size of opposition, and social influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 253-268.
58.
Wolf, S., & Latané, B. (1983). Majority and minority influences on restaurant preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 282-292.
59.
Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J.A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence: A meta-analytic review of social influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 323-345.
