Two experiments tested the hypothesis that evaluations of the dead are more resistant to change than are evaluations of the living. In Experiment 1, perceivers formed an impression of a target person who performed either a moral or an immoral action and then either died or remained alive. Perceivers were later given new inconsistent information about the target's morality. The results revealed that perceivers’ original impressions of the target were significantly less likely to change in response to the inconsistent information when the target was believed to be dead than when she was believed to be alive. Experiment 2 replicated the effect in impressions of real-world targets. The implications of these findings for research on posthumous impression processes are discussed.
Allison, S. T., & Eylon, D. (2005). The demise of leadership: Death positivity biases in posthumous impressions of leaders. In D. Messick & R. Kramer (Eds.), The psychology of leadership: Some new approaches(pp. 295-317). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Allison, S. T., Eylon, D., Beggan, J. K.,& Bachelder, J. (2005). The death positivity bias. Manuscript submitted for publication.
3.
Allison, S. T., Eylon, D., & Markus, M. (2004). Leadership legacy. In J. M. Burns, G. R. Goethals, & G. Sorenson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of leadership(pp. 894-898). New York: Berkshire.
4.
Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Schimel, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (2002). To belong or not to belong, that is the question: Terror management and identification with gender and ethnicity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 26-43.
5.
Asch, S. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
6.
Attig, T. (1996). How we grieve: Relearning the world. New York: Oxford.
7.
Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.
8.
Becker, S. W., & Eagly, A. H. (2004). The heroism of women and men. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
9.
Benton, R. G. (1978). Death and dying. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
10.
Berger, J. (1967). A fortunateman: The story of a country doctor. New York: Centennial Books.
11.
Crookshanks, C. E. (2003). The Montana Korean War memorial: Always remember. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.mtkoreanmemorial.com/
12.
Dechesne, M., Greenberg, J., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2000). Terror management and the vicissitudes of sports fan affiliation: The effects of mortality salience on optimism and fan identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 813-835.
13.
Gordon-Reed, A. (1998). Why Jefferson scholars were the last to know. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.shamema.com/jeff-5.htm.
14.
Greenberg, J., Arndt, J., Schimel, J., Pyszczynski, T., & Solomon, S. (2001). Clarifying the function of mortality salience-induced worldview defense: Renewed suppression or reduced accessibility of death-related thoughts?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 70-76.
15.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 29). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
17.
Hampson, S. E. (1991). Reconciling inconsistent information: Impressions of personality from combinations of traits. European Journal of Personality, 4, 157-172.
18.
Hertel, G., & Bless, H. (2000). “On-line” versus memory-based judgments: Triggering conditions and empirical methods for differentiation. Psychologische Rundschau, 51, 19-28.
19.
Jones, E., Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, S. (2002). The Scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1342-1353.
20.
Lewis, G. (2003, April 4). King legacy reshaped to fit dreamer image, friends say. South Florida Sun-Sentinal,p. 1-1.
21.
Link, J. M. (2000). Vietnam War memorial wall speech. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.mystae.com/reflections/vietnam/memspeech.html.
22.
Mackie, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1987). Group attribution errors and the illusion of group attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 460-480.
23.
Marcus, G. (1999). Dead Elvis: A chronicle of a cultural obsession. New York: Doubleday.
24.
McConnell, A. R. (2001). Implicit theories: Consequences for social judgments of individuals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 215-227.
25.
McConnell, A. R., Sherman, S. J., & Hamilton, D. L. (1997). Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 750-762.
26.
Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (2002).The effects of mortality salience on self-serving attributions—evidence for the function of selfesteem as a terrormanagementmechanism. Basic& Applied Social Psychology, 4, 261-271.
27.
Oglesby, T. (1998). Remembering Diana: People's tribute to their princess. London: Professional Business.
28.
Oliver, P. (2003). September 11thmemorial. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.sept11thmemorial.com/.
29.
Plaks, J. E., Stroessner, S. J., Dweck, C. S., & Sherman, J. W. (2001). Person theories and attention allocation: Preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 876-893.
30.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S. (1997). Why do we need what we need? A terror management perspective on the roots of human social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 1-20.
31.
Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S.,& Greenberg, J. (2003). In the wake of 9/ 11: The psychology of terror. American Journal of Psychiatry, 10-19.
32.
Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory I: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681-690.
33.
Ryan, A. (2003). September 11, 2001, memory quilt: A salute to heroes. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.memorialquilt.com/.
34.
Schimel, J., Simon, L., Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Waxmonsky, S., et al. (1999). Stereotypes and terror management: Evidence that mortality salience enhances stereotypic thinking and preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 905-926.
35.
Silka, L. (1984). Intuitive perceptions of change: An overlooked phenomenon in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 180-190.
36.
Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural worldviews. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology(Vol. 24, pp. 91-159). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
Van Den Bos, K., & Miedema, J. (2000). Toward understanding why fairness matters: The influence of mortality salience on reactions to procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 355-366.
38.
Widmer, T. (2003). “An unfinished life”: Profile in courage. Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.wnbc.com/bookreview/2254777/detail.html.
39.
Wiseman, A., & Koole, S. L. (2003). Hiding in the crowd: Canmortality salience promote affiliation with others who oppose one's worldview?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 84, 511-526.
40.
Ybarra, O. (2001). When first impressions don’t last: The role of isolation and adaptation processes in the revision of evaluative impressions. Social Cognition, 19, 491-520.
