Among members of privileged groups, social inequality is often thought of in terms of the disadvantages associated with outgroup membership. Yet inequality also can be validly framed in terms of ingroup privilege. These different framings have important psychological and social implications. In Experiment 1 (N = 110), White American participants assessed 24 statements about racial inequality framed as either White privileges or Black disadvantages. In Experiment 2 (N = 122), White participants generated examples of White privileges or Black disadvantages. In both experiments, a White privilege framing resulted in greater collective guilt and lower racism compared to a Black disadvantage framing. Collective guilt mediated the manipulation’s effect on racism. In addition, in Experiment 2, a White privilege framing decreased White racial identification compared to a Black disadvantage framing. These findings suggest that representing inequality in terms of outgroup disadvantage allows privileged group members to avoid the negative psychological implications of inequality and supports prejudicial attitudes.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
Barrett, K. C. (1995). A functionalist approach to shame and guilt. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 25-63). New York: Guilford.
3.
Baumeister, R. F. , Stillwell, A. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). Guilt: An interpersonal approach. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 243-267.
4.
Biernat, M. , & Crandall, C. S. (1999). Racial attitudes. In J. P. Robinson, L. S. Wrightsman, & P. Shaver (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 297-411). New York: Academic Press.
5.
Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one’s gender group’s privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184.
6.
Branscombe, N. R. , Doosje, B., & McGarty, C. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of collective guilt. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 49-66). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
7.
Branscombe, N. R. , Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
8.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Miron, A. M. (2004). Interpreting the ingroup’s negative actions toward another group: Emotional reactions to appraised harm. In C. W. Leach & L. Z. Tiedens (Eds.), The social life of emotions (pp. 314-335). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Branscombe, N. R. , Schmitt, M. T., Schiffhauer, K., & Valencia, L. (2004). Racial attitudes in response to thinking about White privilege. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10.
Branscombe, N. R. , Slugoski, B., & Kappen, D. M. (2004). The measurement of collective guilt: What it is and what it is not. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 16-34). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Branscombe, N. R. , & Wann, D. L. (1994). Collective self-esteem consequences of outgroup derogation when a valued social identity is on trial. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 641-657.
12.
Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 745-778.
13.
Cook, T. D. , & Curtin, T. R. (1987). The mainstream and the underclass: Why are the differences so salient and the similarities so unobtrusive? In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation (pp. 217-264). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Devine, P. G. , & Monteith, M. J. (1993). The role of discrepancy-associated affect in prejudice reduction. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 317-344). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
Doosje, B. , Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S. R. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
16.
Estrada-Hollenbeck, M. , & Heatherton, T. F. (1998). Avoiding and alleviating guilt through prosocial behavior. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 215-231). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
Evans, D. C. , Garcia, D. J., Garcia, D. M., & Baron, R. S. (2003). In the privacy of their own homes: Using the Internet to assess racial bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 273-284.
18.
Ferguson, T. J. , & Stegge, H. (1998). Measuring guilt in children: A rose by any other name still has thorns. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt and children (pp. 19-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
Ferguson, T. J. , Stegge, H., & Damhuis, I. (1991). Guilt and shame experiences in elementary school-age children. In P. J. D. Drenth, J. A. Sergeant, & R. J. Takens (Eds.), European perspectives in psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical, psychometrics, personality, developmental, educational, cognitive, gerontological (pp. 195-218). Oxford, UK: Wiley.
20.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21.
Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Iyer, A. , Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117-129.
23.
Jost, J. T. , & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1-27.
24.
Kluegel, J. R. , & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what it is and what it ought to be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
25.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
26.
McConahay, J. B. (1986). Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale. In J. F. Dovidio&S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 91-125). New York: Academic Press.
27.
McIntosh, P. (1992). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women’s studies. In M. L. Anderson & P. H. Collins (Eds.), Race, class and gender (pp. 70-81). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
28.
Miller, D. T. , Taylor, B., & Buck, M. L. (1991). Gender gaps: Who needs to be explained?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 5-12.
29.
Mullin, B. A. , & Hogg, M. A. (1998). Dimensions of subjective uncertainty in social identification and minimal intergroup discrimination. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 345-365.
30.
Parkinson, B. (1995). Ideas and realities of emotion. New York: Routledge.
31.
Perreault, S. , & Bourhis, R. Y. (1999). Ethnocentrism, social identification, and discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 92-103.
32.
Peterson, V. S. , & Runyan, A. S. (1993). Global gender issues. Boulder, CO: Westview.
33.
Phillips, K. (1990). The politics of rich and poor. New York: Random House.
34.
Roseman, I. , Wiest, C., & Swartz, T. (1994). Phenomenology, behaviors, and goals differentiate discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 206-211.
35.
Scher, S. J. (1997). Measuring the consequences of injustice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 482-497.
36.
Schmitt, M. T. , Branscombe, N. R., & Brehm, J. W. (2004). Gender inequality and the intensity of men’s collective guilt. In N. R. Branscombe & B. Doosje (Eds.), Collective guilt: International perspectives (pp. 75-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Sidanius, J. , & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Swim, J. K. , Aikin, W. S., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism, and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199-214.
39.
Swim, J. K. , & Miller, D. L. (1999). White guilt: Its antecedents and consequences for attitudes toward affirmative action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 500-514.
40.
Tajfel, H. (1978). The social psychology of the minority. New York: Minority Rights Group.
41.
Tajfel, H. , & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup conflict. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
42.
Tangney, J. P. (1995). Shame and guilt in interpersonal relationships. In J. P. Tangney & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Self-conscious emotions: The psychology of shame, guilt, embarrassment, and pride (pp. 115-139). New York: Guilford.
43.
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
44.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
45.
Walster, E. , Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 151-176.
46.
Walster, E. , Walster, G. W., Berscheid, E., Austin, W., Traupmann, J., & Utne, M. K. (1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
