The Implicit Association Test (IAT) assesses relative strengths of four associations involving two pairs of contrasted concepts (e.g., male-female and family-career). In four studies, analyses of data from 11 Web IATs, averaging 12,000 respondents per data set, supported the following conclusions: (a) sorting IAT trials into subsets does not yield conceptually distinct measures; (b) valid IAT measures can be produced using as few as two items to represent each concept; (c) there are conditions for which the administration order of IAT and self-report measures does not alter psychometric properties of either measure; and (d) a known extraneous effect of IAT task block order was sharply reduced by using extra practice trials. Together, these analyses provide additional construct validation for the IAT and suggest practical guidelines to users of the IAT.
Baccus, J. R., Baldwin, M. W., & Packer, D. J. (2004). Increasing implicit self-esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15(7), 498-502.
2.
Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitudes can be measured. In H. L. Roediger, III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 117-150). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). Implicit racial identity, attitude, and self-esteem. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.
4.
Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1-61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Blair, I. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242-261.
6.
Blair, I. V., Ma, J., & Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of automatic stereotypes through mental imagery. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 828-841.
7.
Bosson, J. K., Swann, W. B., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2000). Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: The blind men and the elephant revisited?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631-643.
8.
Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
9.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Cunningham, W. A., Nezlek, J. B., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Implicit and explicit ethnocentrism: Revisiting the ideologies of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1332-1346.
11.
Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). Implicit attitude measures: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 12, 163-170.
12.
Dasgupta, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2001). On the malleability of automatic attitudes: Combating automatic prejudice with images of admired and disliked individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 800-814.
13.
De Houwer, J. (2001). A structural and process analysis of the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 443-451.
14.
De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50(2), 77-85.
15.
de Jong, P. J., Pasman, W., Kindt, M., & van den Hout, M. A. (2001). A reaction time paradigm to assess (implicit) complaint-specific dys-functional beliefs. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 39(1), 101-113.
16.
Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R.E. Petty& J.A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength (pp. 247-282). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Fazio, R.H., Sanbonmatsu, D.M., Powell, M.C., & Kardes, F.R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229-238.
18.
Gemar, M. C., Segal, Z. V., Sagrati, S., & Kennedy, S. J. (2001). Mood-induced changes on the Implicit Association Test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110(2), 282-289.
19.
Govan, C. L., & Williams, K. D. (2004). Reversing or eliminating IAT effects by changing the affective valence of the stimulus items. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(3), 357-365.
20.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27.
21.
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022-1038.
22.
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.
23.
Greenwald, A. G., & Nosek, B. A. (2001). Health of the Implicit Association Test at age 3. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 85-93.
24.
Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.
25.
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2004). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Unpublished manuscript, University of Trier, Germany.
26.
Klauer, K. C., & Mierke, J. (2004). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the IAT effect. Unpublished manuscript, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat, Bonn.
27.
Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M.R., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Opportunities and challenges. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105-117.
28.
Lowrey, B. S., Hardin, C. D., & Sinclair, S. (2001). Social influence effects on automatic racial prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 842-855.
29.
McFarland, S. G., & Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20(6), 483-510.
30.
Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1180-1192.
31.
Mitchell, J. A., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Contextual variations in implicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(3), 455-469.
32.
Nosek, B. A. (2004). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit attitudes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
33.
Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19(6), 625-666.
34.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002a). eResearch: Ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161-176.
35.
Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002b). Harvesting intergroup implicit attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration Web site. Group Dynamics, 6(1), 101-115.
36.
Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. (2004). Implicit and explicit attitudes are related but distinct constructs. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
37.
Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 139-165.
38.
Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (in press). Does the Implicit Association Test for assessing anxiety measure trait and state variance?European Journal of Personality.
39.
Schwarz, N., Groves, R. M., & Schuman, H. (1998). Survey methods. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. I (4th ed., pp. 143-179). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Steffens, M. C., & Plewe, I. (2001). Items’ cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift Fuer Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 123-134.
41.
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126.
