Two studies investigated agreeableness, the accessibility of blame, and their potential interactive effects on anger. To measure the chronic accessibility of blame, a choice reaction time task was created that required participants to classify words as blame-worthy or not. It was found that for individuals low in agreeableness, blame accessibility was positively related to anger and arguments during the course of daily life, hostile feelings during the course of a semester, and anger in response to a short video involving a blameworthy action. This same straightforward relationship between the accessibility of blame and anger did not characterize those high in agreeableness. The results suggest that agreeableness plays an important role in facilitating (low agreeableness) or inhibiting (high agreeableness) the link between accessible blame and anger.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahadi, S. A., & Rothbart, M. K. (1994). Temperament, development, and the big five. In C. F. Halverson, Jr., G. A. Kohnstamm, & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 189-207). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Alicke, M. D. (2000). Culpable control and the psychology of blame. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 556-574.
4.
Anderson, C. A. (1997). Effects of violent video movies and trait hostility on hostile feelings and aggressive thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 161-178.
5.
Anderson, C. A., Benjamin, A. B., Jr., & Bartholow, B. D. (1998). Does the gun pull the trigger? Automatic priming effect of weapons pictures and weapons names. Psychological Science, 9, 308-314.
6.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (1997). External validity of “trivial” experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology, 1, 19-41.
7.
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
8.
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145-1160.
9.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253-285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64, 123-152.
12.
Bushman, B. J. (1995). Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 950-960.
13.
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 452-459.
14.
Cervone, D., & Shoda, Y. (1999). Social-cognitive theories and the coherence of personality. In D. Cervone & Y. Shoda (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social-cognitive bases of consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 3-33). New York: Guilford.
15.
Chumbley, J. I. (1986). The roles of typicality, instance dominance, and category dominance in verifying category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 257-267.
16.
Dodge, K. A. (1993). Social-cognitive mechanisms in the development of conduct disorder and depression. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 559-584.
17.
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Cumberland, A., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Zhou, Q., et al. (2002). Prosocial development in early adulthood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 993-1006.
18.
Epstein, S. (1980). The stability of behavior: II. Implications for psychological research. American Psychologist, 35, 790-806.
19.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
21.
Goldberg, L. R. (1997). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Retrieved August 24, 1999, from http://ipip.ori.org/ipip.
22.
Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Hair, E. C. (1996). Perceiving interpersonal conflict and reacting to it: The case for agreeableness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 820-835.
23.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
24.
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., & Graziano, W. G. (2001). Agreeableness as a moderator of interpersonal conflict. Journal of Personality, 69, 323-362.
25.
Joordens, S., & Becker, S. (1997). The long and short of semantic priming effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1083-1105.
26.
Kelly, G. A. (1963). A theory of personality: The psychology of constructs. New York: Norton & Company.
27.
Lindsay, J. L., & Anderson, C. A. (2000). From antecedent conditions to violent actions: A general affective aggression model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 533-547.
28.
MacLeod, C. (1993). Cognition in clinical psychology: Measures, methods, or models? Behaviour Change, 10, 169-165.
29.
McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1994). The stability of personality: Observations and evaluations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 173-175.
31.
Meier, B. P., Robinson, M. D., & Wilkowski, B. M. (2004). Turning the other cheek in semantic priming: Aggressive cues, prosocial thoughts, and agreeableness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32.
Parkinson, B. (1999). Relations and dissociations between appraisal and emotion ratings of reasonable and unreasonable anger and guilt. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 347-385.
33.
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
34.
Robinson, M. D. (in press). Personality as performance: Categorization tendencies and their correlates. Current Directions in Psychological Science.
35.
Robinson, M. D., & Clore, G. L. (2002). Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 198-215.
36.
Robinson, M. D., & Neighbors, C. (in press). Catching the mind in action: Implicit methods in personality research and assessment. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment: A multimethod perspective. Washington, DC: APA Press.
37.
Robinson, M. D., Sohlberg, E. C., Vargas, P., & Tamir, M. (in press). Trait as default: Extraversion, subjective well-being, and the distinction between neutral and positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
38.
Robinson, M. D., Vargas, P., & Crawford, E. G. (2003). Putting process into personality, appraisal, and emotion: Evaluative processing as a missing link. In J. Musch & C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 275-306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Sanders, A. F. (1998). Elements of human performance. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
41.
Skelton, J. A., & Strohmetz, D. B. (1990). Priming symptoms reports with health-related cognitive activity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 449-464.
42.
Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representations and memory. In D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 391-445). New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Tobin, R. M., Graziano, W. G., Vanman, E. J., & Tassinary, L. G. (2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 656-669.
44.
Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
45.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
46.
Wyer, R. S., & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition and its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322-359.
47.
Zillmann, D. (1983). Transfer of excitation in emotional behavior. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 215-240). New York: Guilford.
