The social context hypothesis states that people behave differently in different social groups because group norms and context-specific interpersonal relationships uniquely affect behavior. Consequently, a person who is a member of different, nonoverlapping social groups (i. e., the members of different groups are unacquainted) should be judged consensually on personality traits within each group; however, between groups there should be less agreement in judgments. This research focused on cultural moderation of the social context effect in two collective cultures (China and Mexico) with different norms for interpersonal relationships. Among Chinese, there was greater consensus in trait judgments within groups than between groups, whereas in Mexico, agreement within and between groups was equivalent. Culturally based relationship norms that affect cross-context consistency of behavior and, in turn, the consistency of trait judgments across groups were described.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387-395.
2.
Albright, L., & Malloy, T. E. (1999). Self-observation of social behavior and meta-perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 726-734.
3.
Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., Dong, Q., Kenny, D. A., Fang, X., Winquist, L., et al. (1997). Cross-cultural consensus in personality judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 558-569.
4.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256-274.
5.
Bond, M. H. (1986). The psychology of the Chinese people. London: Oxford University Press.
6.
Bond, M. H. (1996). The handbook of Chinese psychology. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
7.
Bond, M. H., & Hwang, K. -K. (1986). The social psychology of Chinese people. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 213-266). London: Oxford University Press.
8.
Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553.
9.
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
10.
Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Vol. 2. Methodology (pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Sciences, 3, 14-25.
12.
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47-63.
13.
Church, A. T. (2000). Culture and personality: Toward an integrated cultural trait psychology. Journal of Personality, 68, 651-703.
14.
D’Andrade, R. G. (1984). Cultural meaning systems. In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 88-119). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Davidson, A. R., Jaccard, J., Triandis, H. C., Morales, M. L., & Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1976). Cross-cultural model testing: Toward a solution of the emic-etic dilemma. International Journal of Psychology, 11, 1-13.
16.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1965). Socio-cultural and psychodynamic processes in adolescent transition and mental health. In M. Sherif & C. W. Sherif (Eds.), Problems of youth (pp. 129-152). Chicago: Aldine.
17.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1986). Historio-sociocultura y personalidad: Definicion y caracteristicas de los factores en la familia Mexicana [History, socioculture and personality: Definition and characteristics of the Mexican family features]. Revista de Psicologia Social y Personalidad, 2, 15-42.
18.
Diaz-Guerrero, R. (1994). Psicología del Mexicano: Descubrimiento de la etnopsicología [Psychology of the Mexican: The discovery of ethnopsychology] (6th ed.). Mexico City, Mexico: Trillas.
19.
Diaz-Guerrero, R., & Szalay, L. B. (1993). El mundo subjetivo de mexicanos y norteamericanos [The subjective world of Mexicans and North Americans]. Mexico City, Mexico: Trillas.
20.
Diaz-Loving, R. (1996). Una teoria bio-psico-sociocultural de la relacion de pareja [A bio-psycho-sociocultural theory of dyadic relations]. Revista de Psicologia Contemporanea, 19, 18-29.
21.
Diaz-Loving, R. (1998). Contributions of Mexican ethnopsychology to the resolution of the etic-emic dilemma in personality. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 28, 104-118.
22.
Diaz-Loving, R., & Draguns, J. (1999). Culture, meaning and personality in Mexico and in the United States. In Y. T Lee, C. McCauley, & J. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 103-126). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springer, IL: Charles C Thomas.
24.
Fan, Y -Q., & Liu, Y. -D. (1993). Xiao Jin. Wuhan, China: Science and Technology Press in Hubei (in Chinese).
25.
Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689-723.
26.
Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 915-981). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
27.
Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
28.
Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158.
29.
Gabrenya, W. K., & Hwang, K. K. (1996). Chinese social interaction: Harmony and hierarchy on the Good Earth. In M. Bond (Ed.), The handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 309-321). Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
30.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related attitudes. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
31.
Holtzman, W. H. (1982). Cross-cultural comparison of personality development in Mexico. In D. A. Wagner & H. W. Stevenson (Eds.), Cultural perspectives on child development (pp. 225-247). San Francisco: Freeman.
32.
Hong, Y, Morris, M. W., Chiu, C., & Benet-Martinez, V. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist, 7, 709-720.
33.
Hsu, F. L. K. (1961). Psychological anthropology: Approaches to culture and personality. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
34.
Hsu, F. L. K. (Ed.). (1971). Kinship and culture. Chicago: Aldine.
35.
James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.
36.
Ji, L. -J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943-955.
37.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: Guilford.
38.
Kenny, D. A. (1995). SOREMO Version v. 1. Unpublished manual, University of Connecticut.
39.
Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: Acquaintance and the Big Five. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 245-258.
40.
Kenny, D. A., & DePaulo, B. M. (1993). Do people know how other view them? An empirical and theoretical account. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 145-161.
41.
Korten, F. F. (1974). The influence of culture and sex on the perception of persons. International Journal of Psychology, 9, 31-44.
42.
La Rosa, J., & Diaz-Loving, R. (1988). Diferencial semantico del autoconcepto en estudiantes [Semantic differential of students’ self-concepts]. Revista de Psicologia Social y Personalidad, 4, 39-58.
43.
La Rosa, J., & Diaz-Loving, R. (1991). Evaluacion del autoconcepto: Una escale multidimensional [Evaluation of self concept: A multidimensional scale]. Revista Lationamericana de Psicologia, 23, 15-34.
44.
Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (4th ed., Vol. 3, pp. 455-535). New York: John Wiley.
45.
Lee, Y. -T., McCauley, C. R., & Draguns, J. G. (1999). Personality and person perception across cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
Lee, Y. -T., & Ottati, V. (1993). Determinants of ingroup and out-group perception of homogeneity: An investigation of Chinese-American stereotypes. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 24, 298-318.
47.
Lee, Y. -T., & Ottati, V. (1995). Perceived group homogeneity as a function of group membership salience and stereotype threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 612-621.
48.
Lee, Y. -T., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1997). Are Americans more optimistic than Chinese? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 32-40.
49.
Liu, I. -M. (1986). Chinese cognition. In M. H. Bond (Ed.), The psychology of the Chinese people (pp. 73-105). London: Oxford University Press.
50.
Liu, J. H., Ng, S. H., Weatherall, A., & Loong, C. (2000). Filial piety, acculturation, and intergenerational communication among New Zeal And Chinese. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 214-224.
51.
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
52.
Malloy, T. E., Agatstein, F., Yarlas, A., & Albright, L. (1997). Effects of communication, information overlap, and behavioral consistency on consensus in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 270-280.
53.
Malloy, T. E., & Albright, T. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 419-428.
54.
Malloy, T. E., Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., Agatstein, F., & Winquist, L. (1997). Interpersonal perception and meta-perception in nonoverlapping social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 390-398.
55.
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253.
56.
Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S., & Heiman, R. J. (1996). Culture and “basic” psychological principles. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 857-915). New York: Guilford.
57.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
58.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., Del Pilar, G. H., Rolland, J. -P., & Parker, W. D. (1998). Cross-cultural assessment of the five-factor model: The Revised NEO personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 171-188.
59.
Mead, G. H. (1914). 1914 class lectures in social psychology. In D. L. Miller (Ed.), The individual and the social self (pp. 27-105). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
61.
Menon, T., Morris, M. W., Chiu, C. -Y., Hong, Y. -Y. (1999). Culture and construal of agency: Attribution to individual versus group dispositions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 701-717.
62.
Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 961-978.
63.
Miller, J. G., Bersoff, D. M., & Harwood, R. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibility in India and the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 33-47.
64.
Moghaddam, F. M., Taylor, D. M., & Wright, S. C. (1993). Social psychology in cross-cultural perspective. New York: Freeman.
65.
Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971.
66.
Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 681-691.
67.
Sanchez-Burks, J., Nisbett, R. E., & Ybarra, O. (2000). Cultural styles, relationship schemas, and prejudice against outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 174-189.
68.
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: A theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54, 424-435.
69.
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70.
Shweder, R. A., & Bourne, L. (1984). Does the concept of the person varycross-culturally? In R. A. Shweder & R. A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind, self, and emotion (pp. 158-199). New York: Cambridge University Press.
71.
Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1994). Social psychology across cultures. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
72.
Triandis, H. C. (1988). Collectivism and individualism: A reconceptualization of a basic concept in cross-cultural psychology. In G. K. Verma & C. Bargley (Eds.), Personality, attitudes, and cognition (pp. 60-95). London: McMillan.
73.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
74.
Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-in group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323-338.
76.
Triandis, H. C., Marin, G., Betancourt, H., & Chang, B. (1982). Acculturation, biculturalism, and familism among Hispanic and mainstream Navy recruits (Technical Report No. 15). Champaign: University of Illinois, Department of Psychology.
77.
Triandis, H. C., Marin, G., Lisansky, J., & Betancourt, H. (1984). Simpatia as a cultural script for Hispanics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1363-1375.
78.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79.
Whiting, B. B., & Edwards, C. P. (1988). Children of different worlds: The formation of social behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
80.
Whiting, J. W. M., & Child, I. L. (1953). Child training and personality: A cross-cultural study. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
81.
Yang, K. S., & Bond, M. H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087-1095.
82.
Zhang, K., Lee, Y. -T., Liu, Y., & McCauley, C. R. (1999). Chinese-American differences: A Chinese view. In Y. -T. Lee, C. R. McCauley, & J. G. Draguns (Eds.), Personality and person perception across cultures (pp. 127-138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
83.
Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
