The authors test the idea that patterns of masculinity-femininity (MF) help sort adolescents into romantic couples. Using a nationally representative sample of adolescents in Grades 7 to 12 from a probability sample of secondary schools in the United States, an MF measure was constructed by selecting a set of questionnaire items demonstrating sex differences. For each respondent, the probability of being a boy was predicted. Respondents identified opposite-sex romantic partners within their school. When the partner identified also was interviewed, the authors were able to create MF for both members of the couple. Trichotomizing MF scores for each sex, it was determined that couples with a very masculine boy and very feminine girl are most likely to have sex, and to have sex the soonest. The couples for which both members are in the average MF range for their sex are the quickest to break up. The pattern of MF is a strong influence on the behavior of adolescent romantic couples.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antill, J. K. (1983). Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married-couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 145-155.
2.
Aube, J., & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and relationship adjustment: Another look at similarity complementarity hypotheses. Journal of Personality, 63(4), 879-904.
3.
Aube, J., Norcliffe, H., Craig, J. A., & Koestner, R. (1995). Gender characteristics and adjustment-related outcomes: Questioning the masculinity model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 284-295.
4.
Bem, D. J. (1996). Exotic becomes erotic: A developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103(2), 320-335.
5.
Bem, S. L. (1977). Bem sex-role inventory. Stanford, CA: Department of Psychology, Stanford University.
6.
Bradbury, T. N., Campbell, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Longitudinal and behavior-analysis of masculinity and femininity in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 328-341.
7.
Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as in integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 713-721.
Cleveland, H. H., Udry, J. R., & Chantala, K. (2001). Environmental and genetic influences on sex-typed behaviors and attitudes of male and female adolescents. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(12), 1587-1598.
10.
Hamburger, M. E., Hogben, M., McGowan, S., & Dawson, L. J. (1996). Assessing hypergender ideologies: Development and initial validation of a gender-neutral measure of adherence to extreme gender-role beliefs. Journal of Research in Personality, 30(2), 157-178.
11.
Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986). Interaction of sex role self-concept with relationship quality and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(2), 365-370.
12.
Lamke, L. K., Sollie, D. L., Durbin, R. G., & Fitzpatrick, J. A. (1994). Masculinity, femininity and relationship satisfaction: The mediating role of interpersonal competence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11(4), 535-554.
13.
Langis, J., Sabourin, S., Lussier, Y., & Mathieu, M. (1994). Masculinity, femininity, and marital satisfaction: An examination of theoretical models. Journal of Personality, 62(3), 393-414.
14.
Lippa, R. (2000). Gender-related traits in gay men, lesbian women, and heterosexual men and women: The virtual identity of homosexual-heterosexual diagnosticity and gender diagnosticity. Journal of Personality, 68(5), 899-926.
15.
Lippa, R., & Arad, S. (1997). The structure of sexual orientation and its relation to masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: Different for men and women. Sex Roles, 37(3/4), 187-208.
16.
Lippa, R., & Connelly, S. C. (1990). Gender diagnosticity: A new Bayesian-approach to gender-related individual-differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 1051-1065.
17.
Lippa, R., & Hershberger, S. (1999). Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in masculinity, femininity, and gender diagnosticity: Analyzing data from a classic twin study. Journal of Personality, 67(1), 127-155.
18.
Lippa, R. A., Martin, L. R., & Friedman, H. S. (2000). Gender-related individual differences and mortality in the Terman longitudinal study: Is masculinity hazardous to your health? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(12), 1560-1570.
19.
McCann, S. J. H., Stewin, L. L., & Short, R. H. (1990). Femininity and expected satisfaction in the stages of the family-life cycle. Psychological Reports, 66(3), 1187-1194.
20.
Murstein, B. I. (1980). Mate selection in the 1970s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(4), 777-792.
21.
Newcomer, S., & Udry, J. R. (1988). Adolescents’ honesty in a survey of sexual behavior. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3(3/4), 419-423.
22.
Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.
23.
Peplau, L. A., Rubin, Z., & Hill, C. T. (1977). Sexual intimacy in dating relationships. The Journal of Social Issues, 33(2), 86-109.
24.
Siavelis, R. L., & Lamke, L. K. (1992). Instrumentalness and expressiveness: Predictors of heterosexual relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 26(3/4), 149-159.
25.
Smith, E. R., Byrne, D., & Fielding, P. L. (1995). Interpersonal attraction as a function of extreme gender-role adherence. Personal Relationships, 2(2), 161-172.
26.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43-44.
27.
Stata Corp. (2001). Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. 0 [Computer software]. College Station, TX: Author.
28.
Stata user’s guide: Release 7. (2001). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
29.
Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., & Koch, G. G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.
30.
Terman, L. M., & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex personality; studies in masculinity and femininity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Udry, J. R. (2000). Biological limits of gender construction. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 443-457.
32.
Udry, J. R. (2001). Feminist critics uncover determinism, positivism, and antiquated theory. American Sociological Review, 66(4), 611-618.
33.
Udry, J. R., & Chantala, K. (2002). Risk assessment of adolescents with same-sex relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(1), 84-92.
34.
Winch, R. F. (1958). Mate selection: A study of complementary needs. New York: Harper.
