Two experiments were run in The Netherlands and Belgium 1 week after the terrorist attacks against the World Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001. The aim was to investigate whether social categorization affected emotional reactions, behavioral tendencies, and actual behaviors. Results showed that focusing participants’ attention on an identity that included American victims into a common ingroup led them to report more fear and stronger fear-related behavioral tendencies and to engage more often in fear-related behaviors than when victims were categorized as outgroup members. Results are discussed with respect to appraisal theories of emotion and E. R. Smith’s model of group-based emotions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abrams, D. (1999). Social identity, social cognition, and the self: The flexibility and stability of self-categorization. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 197-229). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Doosje, B., Branscombe, N. R., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. (1998). Guilty by association: When one’s group has a negative history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 872-886.
4.
Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228.
5.
Gordijn, E. H., Wigboldus, D., Hermsen, S., & Yzerbyt, V. (1999). Categorisatie en boosheid: De invloed van negatief outgroup gedrag [Categorization and anger: The impact of outgroups’ negative behavior]. In D. Van Knippenberg, C. K. W. De Dreu, C. Martijn, & C. Rutte (Eds.), Fundamentele Sociale Psychologie, 13. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
6.
Gordijn, E. H., Wigboldus, D., & Yzerbyt, V. (2001). Emotional consequences of categorizing victims of negative outgroup behavior as ingroup or outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 4, 317-326.
7.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. American Psychologist, 46, 819-834.
8.
Mackie, D. M., Devos, T., & Smith, E. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602-616.
9.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
10.
Philippot, P., Baeyens, C., Douilliez, C., & Francart, B. (in press). Cognitive regulation of emotion: Application to clinical disorders. To appear in P. Philippot & R. S. Feldman (Eds.), The regulation of emotion. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Reicher, S. (1997). Laying the ground for a common critical psychology. In T. Ibanez & L. Iniguez (Eds.), Critical social psychology (pp. 83-94). London: Sage.
12.
Rimé, B., Finkenauer, C., Luminet, O., Zech, E., &Philippot, P. (1998). Social sharing of emotion: New evidence and new questions. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 9., pp. 145-189). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
13.
Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11-36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14.
Scherer, K. R. (1988). Criteria for emotion-antecedent appraisal: A review. In V. Hamilton, G. H. Bower, &N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 89-126). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
15.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
16.
Smith, E. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297-315). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
17.
Smith, E. R. (1999). Affective and cognitive implications of a group becoming part of the self: New models of prejudice and of the self-concept. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 183-196). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
18.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
20.
Wyer, N. A., Sadler, M. S., & Judd, C. M. (2002). Contrast effects in stereotype formation and change: The role of comparative context. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 443-458.
21.
Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Gordijn, E., & Wigboldus, D. (2002). Intergroup emotions and self-categorization: The impact of perspective-taking on reactions to victims of harmful behaviors. In D. M. Mackie & E. R. Smith (Eds.), From prejudice to intergroup emotions: Differentiated reactions to social groups (pp. 67-88). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
22.
Yzerbyt, V., Dumont, M., Wigboldus, D., &Gordijn, E. (inpress). I feel for us: A self-categorization account of intergroup emotions and action tendencies. British Journal of Social Psychology.
