Asymmetrical Attributions for Approach Versus Avoidance Behavior

Abstract

Five studies examined responsibility inferences and/or person and situation attributions in positively versus negatively valenced motivational contexts. In Experiment 1, participants received information about a teaching assistant who was promised a reward or threatened with a punishment when asked for compliance with a requested transgression. The teaching assistant was perceived as more responsible for complying given the positive than the negative incentive. This finding was replicated in Experiment 2 using different vignettes and incentives. Experiment 3 revealed that the effect of incentive valence on perceived responsibility for compliance remains significant when statistically controlling for perceived compliance rates. Experiment 4 then demonstrated that there are not only greater responsibility judgments given a positive than a negative incentive but also greater dispositional attributions. Finally, Experiment 5 revealed that a similar incentive valence effect is found in other appetitive versus aversive motivational contexts. Theoretical explanations of this phenomenon are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: Prentice Hall.

Cameron, J. (2001). Negative effects of reward on intrinsic motivation: A limited phenomenon. Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan. Review of Educational Research, 71, 29-42.

Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627-668.

Graham, S., & Barker, G. P. (1990). The down side of help: An attributional-developmental analysis of helping behavior as a low-ability cue. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 7-14.

Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219-266). New York: Academic Press.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-291.

Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Kelley, H. H. (1973). Causal schemata and the attribution process. American Psychologist, 28, 107-123.

LaFave, F. W., & Scott, A. W., Jr. (1986). Criminal law (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West Publishers.

10.

Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129-137.

11.

Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and measurement of psychological forces. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

12.

Meyer, W. U., Bachmann, M., Biermann, U., Hempelmann, M., Ploeger, F. O., & Spiller, H. (1979). The informational value of evaluative behavior: Influences of praise and blame on perceptions of ability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 259-268.

13.

Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies in conflict. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (Vol. 1, pp. 431-465). New York: Ronald Press.

14.

Reeder, G. L., & Spores, J. M. (1983). The attribution of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 736-745.

15.

Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. (1995). Justice, liability, & blame: Community views and the criminal law. Boulder, CO: Westview.

16.

Rodrigues, A. (1995). Attribution and social influence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1567-1577.

17.

Rodrigues, A. (2001). Responsibility for compliant behavior: An attributional analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.

18.

Rodrigues, A., & Lloyd, K. L. (1998). Reexamining bases of power from an attributional perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 973-997.

19.

Ross, L., & Nisbett, R. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

20.

Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence. New York: Macmillan.

21.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.

22.

Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion.New York: Springer-Verlag.

23.

Wells, G. (1980). Asymmetric attributions for compliance: Reward vs. punishment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 47-60.