A 5-day field study (N = 415) during and right after a shower ban demonstrated multifaceted social projection and the tendency to draw personality inferences from simple behavior in a time of drastic consensus change. Bathers thought showering was more prevalent than did non-bathers (false consensus) and respondents consistently underestimated the prevalence of the desirable and common behavior—be it not showering during the shower ban or showering after the ban (uniqueness bias). Participants thought that bathers and non-bathers during the ban differed greatly in their general concern for the community, but self-reports demonstrated that this gap was illusory (false polarization). Finally, bathers thought other bathers cared less than they did, whereas non-bathers thought other non-bathers cared more than they did (pluralistic ignorance). The study captures the many biases at work in social perception in a time of social change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allison, S. T., Messick, D. M., & Goethals, G. R. (1989). On being better but not smarter than others: The Muhammad Ali effect. Social Cognition, 7, 275-295.
2.
Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Cambridge, MA: Riverside Press.
3.
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
Dawes, R. M. (1989). Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-17.
5.
Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people's behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 1-11.
6.
Dawes, R. M., & Mulford, M. (1996). The false consensus effect and overconfidence: Flaws in judgment or flaws in how we study judgment? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65(3), 201-211.
7.
Dawes, R. M., Singer, D., & Lemons, F. (1972). An experimental analysis of the contrast effect and its implications for intergroup communication and the indirect assessment of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(3), 281-295.
8.
Esguerra, I. V. (1999, September 21). Putting cleanliness first, some students ignore restrictions. Daily Princetonian.
9.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
10.
Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails: A social and psychological study of a modern group that predicted the destruction on the world. New York: Harper & Row.
11.
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 21-38.
13.
Gilovich, T. (1990). Differential construal and the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 623-634.
14.
Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Boston: Little, Brown.
15.
Goethals, G. R. (1986). Fabricating and ignoring social reality: Self-serving estimates of consensus. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social comparison and relative deprivation: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 4). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Goethals, G. R., Messick, D. M., & Allison, S. T. (1991). The uniqueness bias: Studies of constructive social comparison. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17.
Gross, S. R., & Miller, N. (1997). The “golden section” and bias in perceptions of social consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(3), 241-271.
18.
Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249-279). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). A theory of correspondent inference: From acts to dispositions. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219-266.
20.
Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1976). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
21.
Katz, D., & Allport, F. H. (1931). Students' attitudes: A report of the Syracuse University reaction study. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman.
22.
Katz, D., & Braly, K. W. (1933). Racial stereotypes of 100 college students. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 28, 280-290.
23.
Katz, S. (1997). Secular morality. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health. New York: Routledge.
24.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
25.
Keltner, D., & Robinson, R. J. (1996). Extremism, power, and the imagined basis of social conflict. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 5(4), 101-105.
26.
Krueger, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30). New York: Academic Press.
27.
Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1997). Estimates of social consensus by majorities and minorities: The case for social projection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 299-313.
28.
Kuran, T. (1995). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help? New York: Appleton Century Crofts.
30.
Marks, G., & Miller, N. (1987). Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 72-90.
31.
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 298-305.
32.
Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1991). When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. In J. Suls & T. A. Wills (Eds.), Social comparison: Contemporary theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Miller, D. T., Monin, B., & Prentice, D. A. (2000). Pluralistic ignorance and inconsistency between private attitudes and public behaviors. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Mullen, B., & Goethals, G. R. (1990). Social projection, actual consensus and valence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 279-282.
35.
Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1988). Social projection as a function of cognitive mechanisms: Two meta-analytic integrations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 333-356.
36.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1967). The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
37.
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1996). Pluralistic ignorance and the perpetuation of social norms and unwitting actors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 161-210.
38.
Robinson, R. J., Keltner, D., Ward, A., & Ross, L. (1995). Actual versus assumed differences in construal: “Naive realism” in intergroup perception and conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 404-417.
39.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press.
40.
Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus phenomenon: An attributional bias in self-perception and social-perception processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(3), 279-301.
41.
Suls, J., & Wan, C. K. (1987). In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: Fear and estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 211-217.
