Two experiments were designed to test the prediction, derived from the action-based model of cognitive dissonance, that facilitation of an action-oriented mindset would increase cognitive discrepancy reduction. In Experiment 1, following an easy or difficult decision, a manipulated action-oriented mindset (thinking about implementing the decision) caused persons who made a difficult decision to change their evaluations of the decision alternatives in favor of the decision (spreading of alternatives) more than other participants. Experiment 2 conceptually replicated the effects of Experiment 1, even when an action orientation was induced by having persons write about implementing a different decision. Discussion focuses on the implications of these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5-27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self concept. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103-126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
3.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4.
Batson, C. D. (1975). Rational processing or rationalization? The effect of disconfirming information on a stated religious belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 176-184.
5.
Beauvois, J. L. , & Joule, R. V. (1996). A radical dissonance theory. London: Taylor and Francis.
6.
Beauvois, J. L. , & Joule, R. V. (1999). A radical point of view on dissonance theory. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 43-70). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
Beckmann, J. , & Irle, M. (1985). Dissonance and action control. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 129-150). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Beckmann, J. , & Kuhl, J. (1984). Altering information to gain action control: Functional aspects of human information processing in decision making. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 224-237.
9.
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.
10.
Brehm, J. W. , & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: John Wiley.
11.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401-423.
12.
Cooper, J. , & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229-264). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
13.
Draycott, S. , & Dabbs, A. (1998a). Cognitive dissonance 1: An overview of the literature and its integration into theory and practice in clinical psychology. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 341-353.
14.
Draycott, S. , & Dabbs, A. (1998b). Cognitive dissonance 2: A theoretical grounding of motivational interviewing. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 355-364.
15.
Feather, N. T. (1982). Expectations and actions: Expectancy-value models in psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17.
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18.
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53-92). New York: Guilford.
19.
Gollwitzer, P. M. , & Kinney, R. F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531-542.
20.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000a). Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1490-1501.
21.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000b). A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on the role of emotion in the maintenance and change of beliefs and attitudes. In N. H. Frijda, A. R. S. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), Emotions and beliefs (pp. 185-211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000c). An update on dissonance theory, with a focus on the self. In A. Tesser, R. Felson, & J. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 119-144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2001). The role of affect in cognitive dissonance processes. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 237-255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Harmon-Jones, E. (1999). Toward an understanding of the motivation underlying dissonance effects: Is the production of aversive consequences necessary to cause dissonance? In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 71-99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
25.
Harmon-Jones, E. , Brehm, J. W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L., & Nelson, D. E. (1996). Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 5-16.
26.
Harmon-Jones, E. , & Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
27.
Harmon-Jones, E. , Peterson, H., & Vaughn, K. (in press). The dissonance-inducing effects of an inconsistency between experienced empathy and knowledge of past failures to help: Support for the action-based model of dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology.
28.
Heatherton, T. F. , & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
29.
Heckhausen, H. (1986). Why some time out might benefit achievement motivation research. In J. H. L. van den Bercken, E. E. J. De Bruyn, & T. C. M. Bergen (Eds.), Achievement and task motivation (pp. 7-39). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
30.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover. (Original work published 1890)
31.
Jones, E. E. (1985). Major developments in social psychology during the past five decades. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and methods (3rd ed., pp. 47-107). New York: Random House.
32.
Jones, E. E. , & Gerard, H. B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: John Wiley.
33.
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action-control. In B. A. Maher (Ed.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp. 99-171). New York: Academic Press.
34.
Kuhl, J. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111-169). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35.
Kuhl, J. , & Kazén, M. (1999). Volitional facilitation of difficult intentions: Joint activation of intention memory and positive affect removes Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 382-399.
36.
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row.
37.
McGregor, I. , Newby-Clark, I. R., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). Epistemic discomfort is moderated by simultaneous accessibility of inconsistent elements. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 325-353). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38.
Sherman, S. , & Gorkin, L. (1980). Attitude bolstering when behavior is inconsistent with central attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 388-403.
39.
Simon, L. , Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. W. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
40.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41.
Steele, C. M. , Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 885-896.
42.
Taylor, S. E. , & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213-226.
43.
Walster, E. (1964). The temporal sequence of post-decision processes. In L. Festinger, Conflict, decision, and dissonance (pp. 112-128). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
44.
Winer, B. J. , Brown, D. R., & Michels, K. M. (1991). Statistical principles in experimental design (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
