The impact on self-esteem of activating self-doubt was investigated in three studies. Individuals with enduring high self-doubt were expected to be more threatened by an experimental induction of self-doubt (modeled on the ease of retrieval paradigm) than individuals low in enduring self-doubt, and their self-esteem was predicted to decline. The predictions were supported when self-esteem was measured postexperimentally (Experiment 1) and when it was measured both pre- and postexperimentally (Experiment 2). There was no comparable loss in self-esteem for individuals low in self-doubt. A third experiment explored the phenomenology of low-self-doubt individuals and replicated the finding that their level of self-esteem was unaffected by the induction designed to produce doubt.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aiken, L. S. , & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury, CA: Sage.
2.
Arkin, R. M. , & Baumgardner, A. H. (1985). Self-handicapping. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 169-202). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
Arkin, R. M. , & Oleson, K. C. (1998). Self-handicapping. In J. M. Darley & J. Cooper (Eds.), Attribution processes, person perception, and social interaction: The legacy of Ned Jones. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
5.
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183-200.
6.
Berglas, S. , & Jones, E. E. (1978). Drug choice as a self-handicapping strategy in response to noncontingent success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 405-417.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Crocker, J. , & Wolfe, C. T. (2000). Contingencies of self-worth. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
10.
Duval, S. , & Wicklund, R. A. (1972). A theory of objective self awareness. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Feick, D. L. , & Rhodewalt, F. (1997). The double-edged sword of self-handicapping: Discounting, augmentation, and the protection and enhancement of self-esteem. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 147-163.
12.
Harris, R. N. , & Snyder, C. R. (1986). The role of uncertain self-esteem in self-handicapping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 451-458.
13.
Higgins, R. L. (Ed). (1990). Self-handicapping: The paradox that isn’t. New York: Plenum.
14.
Jarvis, W. B. G. (1998). MediaLab Research Software (Verson 3.0) [Computer software]. Philadelphia: Empirisoft Inc. (www.empirisoft.com)
15.
Jones, E. E. (1989). The framing of competence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 472-492.
16.
Jones, E. E. , & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 200-206.
17.
Jost, J. T. , Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social meta-cognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 137-154.
18.
Leonardelli, G. (1997). [Correlates with the Subjective Overachievement Scale]. Unpublished raw data, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
19.
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
20.
Mischel, W. (1998). Meta-cognition at the hype of social-cognitive psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87-99.
21.
Oleson, K. C. , Poehlmann, K. M., Yost, J. H., Lynch, M. E., & Arkin, R. M. (2000). Subjective overachievement: Individual differences in self-doubt and concern with performance. Journal of Personality, 68, 84-86.
22.
Pelham, B. W. (1991). On confidence and consequence: The certainty and importance of self-knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 518-530.
23.
Pelham, B. W. , & Swann, W. B. (1989). From self-conceptions to self-worth: On the sources and structure of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 672-680.
24.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
Rothman, A. J. , & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-1064.
26.
Schwarz, N. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87-99.
27.
Schwarz, N. , Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195-202.
28.
Steele, C. M. , Spencer, S. J., & Lynch, M. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 885-896.
29.
Strack, F. , & Forster, J. (1998). Self-reflection and recognition: The role of metacognitive knowledge in the attribution of recollective experience. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 111-123.
30.
Trapnell, P. D. , & Campbell, J. D. (1999). Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: Distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 284-304.
31.
Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-232.
32.
Waenke, M. , Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1105-1113.
