What are the cognitive strategies that allow people to manage and maintain their daily mood fluctuations within reasonable limits? Despite intense recent interest in affective phenomena, spontaneous changes over time in mood effects have rarely been studied. Three experiments evaluated the temporal sequence of positivity and negativity in social responses by people who received an initial positive and negative mood induction. Following different mood manipulations, participants performed three kinds of serial social tasks: They generated person descriptions (Experiment 1), completed trait words (Experiment 2), or produced a series of self-descriptions (Experiment 3). Results were consistent with the operation of a spontaneous, homeostatic mood management mechanism. The authors found that initially mood-congruent responses were spontaneously reversed and replaced by mood-incongruent reactions over time. The implications of these results for recent affect-cognition theorizing, and for our understanding of people’s everyday mood management strategies, are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality trait words. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272-279.
2.
Berkowitz, L. , Jaffee, S., Jo, E., & Troccoli, B. T. (2000). On the correction of feeling-induced judgmental biases. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 131-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bower, G. H. (1991). Mood congruity of social judgements. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgements (pp. 31-53). New York: Pergamon.
4.
Bower, G. H. , & Forgas, J. P. (2001). Mood and social memory. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 95-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
Brewer, M. (1988). A dual-process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Bryk, A. , Raudenbush, S., & Congdon, R. (1996). HLM: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling with the HLM/2l and HLM/3l programs. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
7.
Ciarrochi, J. V. , & Forgas, J. P. (1999). On being tense yet tolerant: The paradoxical effects of trait anxiety and aversive mood on intergroup judgments. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 3, 227-238.
8.
Clark, M. S. , & Isen, A. M. (1982). Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior. In A. H. Hastorf & A. M. Isen (Eds.), Cognitive social psychology (pp. 73-108). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
9.
Clore, G. L. , Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social information processing. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 323-419). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Erber, M. W. , & Erber, R. (2001). The role of motivated social cognition in the regulation of affective states. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 275-292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Fiedler, K. (1991). On the task the measures and the mood in research on affect and social cognition. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 83-104). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
12.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , & Fitness, J. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge structures in close relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Forgas, J. R. (1994). Sad and guilty? Affective influences on the explanation of conflict episodes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 56-68.
14.
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39-66.
15.
Forgas, J. P. (1998). Feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiating strategies and outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 565-577.
16.
Forgas, J. P. (1999). On feeling good and being rude: Affective influences on language use and request formulations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 928-939.
17.
Forgas, J. P. (2001). The handbook of affect and social cognition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Forgas, J. P. (in press). Feeling and doing: Affective influences on social cognition and behavior. Psychological Inquiry.
19.
Forgas, J. P. , & Fiedler, K. (1996). Us and them: Mood effects on intergroup discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 39-70.
20.
Forgas, J. P. , Johnson, R., & Ciarrochi, J. (1998). Affect control and affect infusion: A multi-process account of mood management and personal control. In M. Kofta, G. Weary, & G. Sedek (Eds.), Personal control in action: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms (pp. 155-196). New York: Plenum.
21.
Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press.
22.
Harari, F. , & McDavid, J. W. (1973). Name stereotypes and teachers’ expectations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65, 222-225.
23.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Lay epistemics and human knowledge: Cognitive and motivational bases. New York: Plenum.
24.
Mayer, J. D. (2001). Emotion, intelligence, and emotional intelligence. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 410-432). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25.
Nezlek, J. (2001). Multilevel random coefficient analyses of event and interval contingent data in social and personality psychology research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26.
Parrott, W. G. , & Sabini, J. (1990). Mood and memory under natural conditions: Evidence for mood incongruent recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(2), 321-336.
27.
Rusting, C. (2001). Personality as a mediator of affective influences on social cognition. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 371-393). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Sedikides, C. (1994). Incongruent effects of sad mood on self-conception valence: It’s a matter of time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 161-172.
29.
Sedikides, C. (1995). Central and peripheral self-conceptions are differentially influenced by mood: Tests of the differential sensitivity hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 759-777.
30.
Smith, S. , & Petty, R. (1995). Personality moderators of mood congruency on cognition: The role of self-esteem and negative mood regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1092-1107.
31.
Suls, J. (2001). Affect, stress and personality. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 392-409). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
Suls, J. , Green, P., & Hillis, S. (1998). Emotional reactivity to everyday problems, affective inertia, and neuroticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 127-136.
33.
Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
34.
Trope, Y. , Ferguson, M., & Raghunanthan, R. (2001). Mood as a resource in processing self-relevant information. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), The handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 256-274). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
