Four studies demonstrate that communication set can affect the initial perception of ongoing behavior, which, in turn, can affect subsequent reactions to, or judgments based on, that behavior. Participants expecting to transmit information from an observed behavior sequence to another person unitized (i.e., perceptually organized) that sequence into fewer, but not qualitatively different, meaningful actions than did either participants expecting to receive information from another person or participants with no expectation (controls). In addition, transmitters (relative to receivers or controls) attributed traits to an observed actor less confidently (Study 2), recalled fewer actions from the behavior sequence (Study 3), and experienced less positive affective reactions to the sequence (Studies 3 and 4). It appears from these results that, at least in some instances, the objective of transmitters from the outset is to construct a simpler, more easily communicable summary of information, but not one that is fundamentally different in content from receivers or controls.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 279-286.
2.
Brock, T. C. , & Fromkin, H. L. (1968). Cognitive tuning set and behavioral receptivity to discrepant information. Journal of Personality, 36, 108-125.
3.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
4.
Cacioppo, J. T. , Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals low versus high in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
5.
Cohen, A. R. (1961). Cognitive tuning as a factor affecting impression formation. Journal of Personality, 29, 235-245.
6.
Cohen, C. E. , & Ebbesen, E. B. (1979). Observational goals and schema activation: A theoretical framework for behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 305-329.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Ebbesen, E. B. (1980). Cognitive processes in understanding ongoing behavior. In R. Hastie, T. M. Ostrom, E. B. Ebbesen, R. S. Wyer, D. L. Hamilton, & D. E. Carlston (Eds.), Person memory: The cognitive basis of social perception (pp. 179-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Engquist, G. , Newtson, D., & LaCross, K. (1979). Prior expectations and the perceptual segmentation of ongoing behavior. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
10.
Geers, A. L. , & Lassiter, G. D. (1999). Affective expectations and information gain: Evidence for assimilation and contrast effects in affective experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 394-413.
11.
Gordon, P. C. , & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Implicit learning and generalization of the “mere exposure” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 492-500.
12.
Graziano, W. G. , Moore, J. S., & Collins, J. E., II.. (1988). Social cognition as segmentation of the stream of behavior. Developmental Psychology, 24, 568-573.
13.
Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603-618.
14.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Guerin, B. (1997). Social contexts for communication: Communicative power as past and present social consequences. In J. Owens (Ed.), Context and communication behavior (pp. 133-179). Reno, NV: Context Press.
16.
Guerin, B. , & Innes, J. M. (1989). Cognitive tuning sets: Anticipating the consequences of communication. Current Psychology: Research and Review, 8, 234-249.
17.
Hamilton, D. L. , Katz, L. B., & Leirer, V. O. (1980). Cognitive representation of personality impressions: Organizational processes in first impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1050-1063.
18.
Handley, I. M. , & Lassiter, G. D. (2000). The effects of mood on processing ongoing behavior: A second look. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19.
Hanson, C. , & Hirst, W. (1989). On the representation of events: A study of orientation, recall, and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 136-147.
20.
Harkins, S. G. , Harvey, J. H., Keithly, L., & Rich, M. (1977). Cognitive tuning, encoding, and the attribution of causality. Memory and Cognition, 5, 561-565.
21.
Harvey, J. H. , Harkins, S. G., & Kagehiro, D. K. (1976). Cognitive tuning and the attribution of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 708-715.
22.
Higgins, E. T. (1981). The “communication game”: Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 343-392). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
Higgins, E. T. , McCann, C. D., & Fondacaro, R. (1982). The “communication game”: Goal-directed encoding and cognitive consequences. Social Cognition, 1, 21-37.
24.
Hogue, T. E. , & Atkinson, M. L. (1989). Approach and avoidance of social information. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 21, 310-322.
25.
Jensen, T. D. , & Rottmeyer, L. W. (1986). Visual information-processing of television commercials: Cognitive effects. Advances in Consumer Research, 13, 158-163.
26.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
27.
Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: Seizing and freezing. Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
29.
Lassiter, G. D. (1988). Behavior perception, affect, and memory. Social Cognition, 6, 150-176.
30.
Lassiter, G. D. , Apple, K. J., & Beers, M. J. (2001). Distinguishing between perceptual differentiation and cognitive elaboration: A dual-process model of action memory. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, Athens.
31.
Lassiter, G. D. , Briggs, M. A., & Bowman, R. E. (1991). Need for cognition and the perception of ongoing behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 156-160.
32.
Lassiter, G. D. , Geers, A. L., Apple, K. J., & Beers, M. J. (2000). Observational goals and behavior unitization: A reexamination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 649-659.
33.
Lassiter, G. D. , Geers, A. L., Flannery, B. C., & Ploutz-Snyder, R. J. (1999). Attributional consequences of variation in behavior perception: It’s what you unitize and how you unitize it. Unpublished manuscript, Ohio University, Athens.
34.
Lassiter, G. D. , Koenig, L. J., & Apple, K. J. (1996). Mood and behavior perception: Dysphoria can increase and decrease effortful processing of information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 794-810.
35.
Lassiter, G. D. , & Slaw, R. D. (1991). The unitization and memory of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 80-82.
36.
Lassiter, G. D. , & Stone, J. I. (1984). Affective consequences of variation in behavior perception: When liking is in the level of analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 253-259.
37.
Lassiter, G. D. , Stone, J. I., & Rogers, S. L. (1988). Memorial consequences of variation in behavior perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 222-239.
38.
Leventhal, H. (1962). The effect of sets and discrepancy on impression change. Journal of Personality, 30, 1-15.
39.
Linville, P. W. (1982). The complexity-extremity effect and age-based stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 193-211.
40.
Linville, P. W. , & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689-703.
41.
Margolin, J. , & Niedenthal, P. M. (2000). Manipulating self-complexity with communication role assignment: Evidence of the flexibility of self-concept structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 424-444.
42.
Markus, H. , Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494-1512.
43.
Massad, C. M. , Hubbard, M., & Newtson, D. (1979). Selective perception of events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 513-532.
44.
Matlin, M. W. (1971). Response competition, recognition, and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 295-300.
45.
Mayseless, O. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1987). What makes you so sure? Effects of epistemic motivations on judgmental confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 162-183.
46.
Mazis, M. B. (1973). Cognitive tuning and receptivity to novel information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 307-319.
47.
McArthur, L. Z. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 201-241). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
48.
Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28-38.
49.
Newtson, D. (1976a). Foundations of attribution: The perception of ongoing behavior. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 223-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50.
Newtson, D. (1976b). The process of behavior observation. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 2, 114-122.
51.
Newtson, D. (1980). An interactionist perspective on social knowing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 520-531.
52.
Newtson, D. , & Engquist, G. (1976). The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436-450.
53.
Newtson, D. , Engquist, G., & Bois, J. (1976). The reliability of a measure of behavior perception. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 5. (Ms. No. 1173)
54.
Newtson, D. , Engquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The objective basis of behavior units. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 847-862.
55.
Newtson, D. , Hairfield, J., Bloomingdale, J., & Cutino, S. (1987). The structure of action and interaction. Social Cognition, 5, 191-237.
56.
Newtson, D. , & Rindner, R. (1979). Variation in behavior perception and ability attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1847-1858.
57.
Newtson, D. , Rindner, R. J., & Campbell, R. (1979). Observer skill and perceptual organization. Unpublished manuscript, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
58.
Newtson, D. , Rindner, R. J., Miller, R., & LaCross, K. (1978). Effects of availability of feature changes on behavior segmentation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 379-388.
59.
Rosenberg, S. , Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.
60.
Russell, J. C. (1979). Perceived action units as a function of subjective importance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 206-209.
61.
Scott, W. A. (1969). Structure of natural cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 261-278.
62.
Stang, D. J. (1975). Effects of “mere exposure” on learning and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 7-12.
63.
Vallacher, R. R. , & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they are doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3-15.
64.
Viswanathan, M. (1997). Individual differences in need for precision. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 717-735.
65.
Webster, D. M. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1049-1062.
66.
Wilder, D. (1978a). Effects of predictability on units of perception and attribution. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 281-284.
67.
Wilder, D. (1978b). Predictability of behaviors, goals, and unit of perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 604-607.
68.
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1980). The acquisition and use of social knowledge: Basic postulates and representative research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 558-573.
69.
Zajonc, R. B. (1960). The process of cognitive tuning in communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 61, 159-167.
