Gender stereotypes are understood as the ascription of different personality traits to men and women. Data from American and Italian samples showed that consistent with the attribution hypothesis, the estimated prevalence of a trait in a target group predicted perceptions of trait typicality well. In contrast, there was no support for the categorization hypothesis, according to which perceived differences in trait prevalence between groups should independently predict trait typicality. Nevertheless, participants overestimated gender differences in personality as predicted by the principle of intercategory accentuation. The implications of these findings for the rationality and accuracy of gender stereotyping are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Allport, G.W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Asendorpf, J.B., & Ostendorf, F. (1998). Is self-enhancement healthy? Conceptual, psychometric, and empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 955-966.
3.
Ashmore, R.D., & Del Boca, F.K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In D.L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
Auster, C.J., & Ohm, S.C. (2000). Masculinity and femininity in contemporary American society: A reevaluation of the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 43, 499-528.
5.
Banaji, M.R., & Bhaskar, R. (2000). Implicit stereotypes and memory: The bounded rationality of social beliefs. In D.L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory, brain, and belief(pp. 139-175). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Barsalou, L.W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629-649.
7.
Becker, R.A., Chambers, J.M., & Wilks, A.R. (1996). The new S language: A programming environment for data analysis and graphics. New York: Chapman & Hill.
8.
Bem, S.L. (1981). The Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
9.
Beyer, S. (1999). The accuracy of academic gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 40, 787-813.
Campbell, D.T. (1956). Enhancement of contrast as composite habit. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 350-355.
12.
Colvin, C.R., Block, J., & Funder, D.C. (1995). Overly positive self-evaluation and personality: Negative implications for mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1152-1162.
13.
Conway, M., & Vartanian, L.R. (2000). A status account of gender stereotypes: Beyond communality and agency. Sex Roles, 43, 181-199.
14.
Dawes, R.M. (1970). An inequality concerning correlation of composites vs. composites of correlations. Oregon Research Institute Technical Report, 1(1).
15.
Dawes, R.W. (1998). Behavioral decision making and judgment. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 497-548). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Diekman, A.B., & Eagly, A.H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
17.
Diekman, A.B., Eagly, A.H., & Kulesa, P. (2002). Accuracy and bias in stereotypes about the social and political attitudes of women and men. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 268-282.
18.
Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
19.
Estes, W.K. (1976). The cognitive side of probability learning. Psychological Review, 83, 37-64.
20.
Ford, T.E., & Stangor, C. (1992). The role of diagnosticity in stereotype formation: Perceiving group means and variances. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 356-367.
21.
Fried, L.S., & Holyoak, K.J. (1984). Induction of category distributions: A framework for classification learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 234-257.
22.
Hall, J.A., & Carter, J.D. (1999). Gender-stereotype accuracy as an individual difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 350-359.
23.
Hasman, J.F., & Krueger, J. (2002). [The typicality of gender-descriptive attributes]. Unpublished raw data.
24.
Holt, C.L., & Ellis, J.B. (1998). Assessing the current validity of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 39, 929-941.
25.
Judd, C.M., & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109-128.
26.
Kenny, D.A., & Winquist, L. (2001). The measurement of interpersonal sensitivity: Consideration of design, components, and unit of analysis. In J. Hall & F. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 265-302). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
Klar, Y., & Giladi, E.E. (1999). Are most people happier than their peers, or are they just happy?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 585-594.
28.
Krueger, J. (1992). On the overestimation of between-group differences. European Review of Social Psychology, 3, 31-56.
29.
Krueger, J. (1996a). Personal beliefs and cultural stereotypes about racial characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 536-548.
30.
Krueger, J. (1996b). Probabilistic national stereotypes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 961-980.
31.
Krueger, J. (2002). [Stereotype learning from frequencies]. Unpublished raw data.
32.
Krueger, J., & Mueller, R.A. (2002). Unskilled, unaware, or both? The contribution of social-perceptual skills and statistical regression to self-enhancement biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 180-188.
33.
Krueger, J., Rothbart, M., & Sriram, N. (1989). Category learning and change: Differences in sensitivity to information that enhances or reduces intercategory distinctions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 866-875.
34.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
35.
Lambert, A.J. (1995). Stereotypes and social judgment: The consequences of group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 388-403.
36.
Martin, C.L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 489-499.
37.
McCauley, C., & Stitt, C.L. (1978). An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 929-940.
38.
McNemar, Q. (1969). Psychological statistics (4th ed.). New York: John Wiley.
39.
Oakes, P.J., Haslam, S.A., & Turner, J.C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Rosch, E., & Mervis, C.B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.
42.
Rothbart, M., Sriram, N., & Davis-Stitt, C. (1996). The retrieval of typical and atypical category members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 309-336.
43.
Sherman, J.W. (1996). Development and mental representation of stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1126-1141.
44.
Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
45.
Staats, A.W., & Staats, C.K. (1958). Attitudes established by classical conditioning. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 57, 37-40.
46.
Tajfel, H. (1969). Cognitive aspects of prejudice. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 79-97.
47.
Wilcox, C., & Francis, L.J. (1997). Beyond gender stereotyping: Examining the validity of the BEM Sex-Role Inventory among 16-to 19-year old females in England. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 9-13.
48.
Williams, J.E., Satterwhite, R.C., & Best, D.L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The five factor model. Sex Roles, 40, 513-525.
49.
Zawadski, B. (1948). Limitations of the scapegoat theory of prejudice. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 43, 127-141.
50.
Zuckerman, M., & Knee, C.R. (1996). The relation between overly positive self-evaluation and adjustment: A comment on Colvin, Block, and Funder (1995). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1250-1251.
