The effects of deliberative and implemental mindsets—cognitive and motivational states associated with predecisional and postdecisional frames of mind, respectively—were examined in the context of the self-regulation of behavior. Participants who had been induced to deliberate the merits of participating in a specified task formulated more pessimistic expectations about this task than did participants who had been induced to imagine implementing a plan to complete the task. Moreover, participants in the deliberation condition underperformed relative to the participants in the implemental condition, demonstrating that deliberative and implemental thinking can influence behavior as well as cognition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armor, D.A., & Sackett, A.M. (2002). [Performance predictions for real versus hypothetical tasks]. Unpublished raw data. Yale University.
2.
Armor, D.A., & Taylor, S.E. (1998). Situated optimism: Specific outcome expectancies and self-regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 309-379.
3.
Armor, D.A., & Taylor, S.E. (2002). When predictions fail: The dilemma of unrealistic optimism. In T. Gilovich, D.W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 334-347). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Atkinson, J.W. (1964). An introduction to motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.
5.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
6.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
7.
Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
8.
Beckmann, J., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1987). Deliberative versus implemental states of mind: The issue of impartiality in predecisional and post-decisional information processing. Social Cognition, 5, 259-279.
9.
Brehm, J.W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
10.
Buehler, R., Griffin D., & Ross, M. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366-381.
11.
Buehler, R., Griffin D., & Ross, M. (2002). InT. Gilovich, D.W. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 250-270). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Campbell, J.D., & Fairey, P.J. (1985). Effects of self-esteem, hypothetical explanations, and verbalization of expectancies on future performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1097-1111.
13.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1981). Attention and self-regulation: A control theory approach to human behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14.
Carver, C.S., & Scheier, M.F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Cordova, D.I., & Lepper, M.R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4, 715-730.
16.
Dawes, R.M. (1988). Rational choice in an uncertain world. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
17.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and selfdetermination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
18.
Gilovich, T., Kerr, M., & Medvec, V.H. (1993). Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 552-560.
19.
Gollwitzer, P.M. (1990). Action phases and mind-sets. In E.T. Higgins & R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 53-92). New York: Guilford.
20.
Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503.
21.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403-422). New York: Guilford.
22.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186-199.
23.
Gollwitzer, P.M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implemental mind-sets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1119-1127.
24.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Kinney, R.F. (1989). Effects of deliberative and implemental mind-sets on illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 531-542.
25.
Gramsci, A. (1994). Letters from prison (Vol. 1; F. Rosengarten, Ed.; R. Rosenthal, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
Heckhausen, H. (1986). Why some time out might benefit achievement motivation research. In J.H.L. van den Berken, E.E.J. De Bruyn, & T.C.M. Bergen (Eds.), Achievement and task motivation (pp. 7-39). Lisse, the Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
27.
Heckhausen, H., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1987). Thought contents and cognitive functioning in motivational and volitional states of mind. Motivation and Emotion, 11, 101-120.
28.
Iyengar, S.S., & Lepper, M.R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 995-1006.
29.
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.
30.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Intuitive prediction: Biases and corrective procedures. TIMS Studies in Management Science, 12, 313-327.
31.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Koole, S., & Spijker, M.V. (2000). Overcoming the planning fallacy through willpower: The effects of implementation intentions on actual and predicted task-completion times. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 873-888.
33.
Newby-Clark, I.R., Ross, M., Buehler, R., Koehler, D.J., & Griffin, D. (2000). People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 171-182.
34.
Pham, L.B., & Taylor, S.E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 250-260.
35.
Sackett, A.M. (2002). Optimism and accuracy in performance predictions: An experimental test of the self-protection hypothesis. Unpublished master’s thesis, Yale University.
36.
Scheier, M.F., & Carver, C.S. (1988). A model of behavioral selfregulation: Translating intention into action. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 303-346). New York: Academic Press.
37.
Sherman, S.J., Skov, R.B., Hervitz, E.F., & Stock, C.B. (1981). The effects of explaining hypothetical future events: From possibility to actuality and beyond. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 142-158.
38.
Staw, B.M. (1976). Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16, 27-44.
39.
Taylor, S.E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.
40.
Taylor, S.E., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1995). The effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213-226.
41.
Taylor, S.E., Pham, L.B., Rivkin, I., & Armor, D.A. (1998). Harnessing the imagination: Mental simulation, self-regulation and coping. American Psychologist, 53, 429-439.
42.
Weinstein, N.D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 806-820.
43.
Zuckerman, M., Porac, J.F.Lathin, D., Smith, R., & Deci, E.L. (1978). On the importance of self-determination for intrinsically motivated behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 443-446.
