Processes of self-concept immunization are introduced as a way of reconciling self-concept protection against threatening information with the necessity of acknowledging own failure or losses. Self-immunization works by adaptively changing the subjective operationalization of personal traits, such that skills that individuals believe themselves to be good at are conceived as highly diagnostic, whereas skills that persons do not believe they possess are considered less diagnostic. Three studies are presented to investigate this stabilizing process. Correlational as well as experimental and longitudinal data support the assumption that self-immunization stabilizes central and abstract aspects of the self-concept without ignoring negative information on concrete skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baumeister, R.F. (1995). Self and identity: An introduction. In A. Tesser (Ed.), Advanced social psychology (pp. 50-98). New York: McGraw-Hill.
2.
Baumeister, R.F. (1996). Self-regulation and ego threat: Motivated cognition, self deception, and destructive goal setting. In P.M. Gollwitzer & J.A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition to behavior (pp. 27-47). New York: Guilford.
3.
Baumeister, R.F. (1998). The self. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 680-739). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
4.
Bengtson, V.L., Reedy, M.N., & Gordon, C. (1985). Aging and self-conceptions: Personality processing and social contexts. In J.E. Birren & K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of aging (pp. 544-593). New York: Van Nostrand.
5.
Brandtstädter, J. (1999). Sources of resilience in the aging self: Toward integrating perspectives. In T.M. Hess & F. Blanchard-Fields (Eds.), Social cognition and aging (pp. 123-141). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6.
Brandtstädter, J., & Greve, W. (1994). The aging self: Stabilizing and protective processes. Developmental Review, 14, 52-80.
7.
Brandtstädter, J., Wentura, D., & Greve, W. (1993). Adaptive resources of the aging self: Outlines of an emergent perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 16, 323-349.
8.
Brandtstädter, J., Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (1999). Intentional self-development through adulthood and later life: Tenacious pursuit and flexible adjustment of goals. In J. Brandtstädter & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the life-span (pp. 373-400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9.
Cantor, N., Markus, H., Niedenthal, P., & Nurius, P. (1990). On motivation and the self-concept. In E.T. Higgins (Ed.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 96-121). New York: Guilford.
10.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Dixon, T.M., & Baumeister, R.F. (1991). Escaping the self: The moderating effect of self-complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 363-368.
12.
Dunning, D. (1993). Words to live by: The self and definitions of social concepts and categories. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4, pp. 99-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
Dunning, D. (1995). Trait importance and modifiability as factors influencing self-assessment and self-enhancement motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1297-1306.
14.
Dunning, D. (1999). A newer look: Motivated social cognition and the schematic representation of social concepts. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 1-11.
15.
Dunning, D., & Cohen, G.L. (1992). Egocentric definitions of traits and abilities in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 341-355.
16.
Dunning, D., Leuenberger, A., & Sherman, D.A. (1995). A new look at motivated inference: Are self-serving theories of success a product of motivational factors?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 58-68.
17.
Dunning, D., & McElwee, R.O. (1995). Idiosyncratic trait definitions: Implications for self-description and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 936-946.
18.
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J.A., & Holzberg, A.D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082-1090.
19.
Dunning, D., Perie, M., & Story, A.L. (1991). Self-serving prototypes of social categories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 957-968.
20.
Gollwitzer, P.M., & Bargh, J.A. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. New York: Guilford.
21.
Greve, W. (1990). Stabilisierung und Modifikation des Selbstkonzeptes im Erwachsenenalter: Strategien der Immunisierung [Selfconcept stabilization and modification in adulthood: Strategies of immunization]. Sprache und Kognition, 9, 218-230.
22.
Greve, W., Krampen, G., & Schorn, A. (1986). Selbstkonzepte eigener kommunikativer Kompetenzen [Self-concept of communicative ability] (Trierer Psychologische Berichte, 13, 7). Trier, Germany: University of Trier.
23.
Greve, W., Wentura, D., & Zisterer, M. (1999). Dynamiken der Selbst-Stabilisierung im Alter [Processes of self-stabilization in old age]. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Psychologie, 8, 167-174.
24.
Hayes, A.F., & Dunning, D. (1997). Construal processes and trait ambiguity: Implications for self-peer agreement in personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 644-677.
25.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-195). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Linville, P.W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663-676.
27.
Linville, P.W., & Carlston, D.E. (1994). Social cognition of the self. In P.G. Devine, D.L. Hamilton, & T.M. Ostrom (Eds.), Social cognition: Impact on social psychology (pp. 143-193). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
29.
Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 299-337.
30.
Popper, K.R. (1968). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson. (Original work published 1934)
31.
Ryff, C.D., Singer, B., Love, G.D., & Essex, M.J. (1998). Resilience in adulthood and later life. Defining features and dynamic processes. In J. Lomranz (Ed.), Handbook of aging and mental health: An integrative approach (pp. 69-96). New York: Plenum.
32.
Schneider, S.L. (2001). In search of realistic optimism. American Psychologist, 56, 250-263.
33.
Sedikides, C. (1993). Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 317-338.
34.
Sedikides, C., & Skowronski, J.J. (2000). On the evolutionary functions of the symbolic self: The emergence of self-evaluation motives. In A. Tesser, R.B. Felson, & J.M. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 91-117). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35.
Showers, C.J. (1995). The evaluative organization of self-knowledge: Origins, processes, and implications for self-esteem. In M.H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 101-120). New York: Plenum.
36.
Simon, L., Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
37.
Stahlberg, D., Petersen, L.-E., & Dauenheimer, D. (1999). Preferences for and evaluating of self-relevant information depending on the elaboration of the self-schema involved. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 489-502.
38.
Story, A.L., & Dunning, D. (1998). The more rational side of selfserving prototypes: The effects of success and failure performance feedback. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 513-529.
39.
Suls, J., Lemos, K., & Stewart, H.L. (2001). Self-esteem, construal, and comparisons with the self, friends, and peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 252-261.
40.
Swann, W.B. (1983). Self-verification: Bringing the social reality in harmony with the self. In J. Suls & A.G. Greewald (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 2, pp. 33-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Tauber, A.I. (1994). The immune self: Theory or metaphor?Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Taylor, S.E., & Gollwitzer, P.M. (1995). Effects of mindset on positive illusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 213-226.
43.
Trope, Y. (1980). Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and task preference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 116-129.
44.
Trope, Y. (1986). Self-enhancement and self-assessment in achievement behavior. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 350-378). New York: Guilford.
45.
Wentura, D., & Greve, W. (1996). Selbstkonzept-Immunisierung: Evidenz für automatische selbstbildstabilisierende Begriffsanpassungen [Self-concept immunization: Evidence for automatic concept adaptations stabilizing the self]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 27, 207-223.
46.
Wills, T.A. (1987). Downward comparison as a coping mechanism. In C.R. Snyder & C.E. Ford (Eds.), Coping with negative life events (pp. 243-268). New York: Plenum.
