Some models of conflict resolution propose that group membership be downplayed in negotiation because social categorization leads to ingroup bias. Challenging this view, this article argues that social conflict occurs partly as a collective attempt to establish a positive and distinct social identity. Restoration of this identity should therefore be important to negotiating groups. Two interactive studies (Ns = 104, 195) tested the effects over time of emphasizing identity-based group boundaries prior to negotiation with another group. Results indicated that where group members had the opportunity to interact with ingroup members (Study 1) or within a group (Study 2) prior to a superordinate negotiation, they consistently identified more at the subcategory level but were also more satisfied with the negotiation process. Evidence from the second study suggests that these effects were mediated by the development of a superordinate identity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacharach, S., & Lawler, E. (1981). Bargaining. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
3.
Bourhis, R. Y., Turner, J. C., & Gagnon, A. (1997). Interdependence, social identity and discrimination. In R. Spears & P. J. Oakes (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 273-295). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
4.
Brown, R., & Wade, G. (1987). Superordinate goals and intergroup behavior: The effect of role ambiguity and status on intergroup attitudes and task performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 131-142.
5.
Coser, L. (1962). Continuities in the study of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
6.
de Dreu, C. (1995). Coercive power and concession making in bilateral negotiation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 39, 646-670.
7.
de Dreu, C., Carnevale, P., Emans, B., & Van de Vliert, E. (1995). Outcome frames in bilateral negotiation: Resistance to concession making and frame adoption, European Review of Social Psychology, 6, 97-125.
8.
de Dreu, C. K. W., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1995). The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1178-1188.
9.
Deschamps, J.-C. (1984). The social psychology of intergroup relations and categorical differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Eds.), The social dimension (pp. 541-559). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Deutsch, M. (1990). Cooperation, conflict and justice. In S. Wheelan, E. Pepitone, & J. Abt (Eds.), Advances in field theory (pp. 149-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Douglas, A. (1957). The peaceful settlement of industrial intergroup disputes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 489-510.
12.
Eggins, R. A., Reynolds, K. J., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Working with identities: The ASPIRe model of organizational planning, negotiation and development. In S. A. Haslam, D. van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis.
13.
Ellemers, N., Van Knippenberg, A., & Wilke, H. A. (1990). The influence of permeability of group boundaries and stability of group status on strategies of individual mobility and social change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 233-246.
14.
Gaertner, S., Mann, J., Murrell, A., & Dovidio, J. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of re-categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
15.
Grant, P. (1990). Cognitive theories applied to intergroup conflict. In R. J. Fisher (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup and international conflict resolution (pp. 39-57). New York: Springer-Verlag.
16.
Haslam, S. A. (2001). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach. London: Sage Ltd.
17.
Haslam, S. A., Eggins, R. A., & Reynolds, K. J. (2000). The ASPIRe model: Actualizing social and personal identity resources to improve strategic planning and encourage sustainable productivity in organizations. Unpublished manuscript, The Australian National University.
18.
Hewstone, M., Fincham, F., & Jaspars, J. (1981). Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behavior: A replication with “penalties.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 101-107.
19.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
20.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts; selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper.
21.
Messick, D., & Mackie, D. (1989). Intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 45-81.
22.
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 151-181). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Mummendey, A. (1995). Positive distinctiveness and social discrimination: An old couple living in divorce. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 657-670.
24.
Oakes, P. J. (1987). The salience of social categories. In J. C. Turner, M. A. Hogg, P. J. Oakes, S. D. Reicher, & M. S. Wetherall (Eds.), Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory (pp. 117-141). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
25.
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & Turner, J. C. (1994). Stereotyping and social reality. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
26.
Oakes, P. J., & Reynolds, K. J. (1997). Asking the accuracy question: Is measurement the answer? In R. Spears & P. J. Oakes (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 51-71). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
27.
Pruitt, D. (1972). Methods for resolving differences of interest: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 133-154.
28.
Pruitt, D. G., Pierce, R. S., Zubek, J. M., McGillicuddy, N. B., & Welton, G. L. (1993). Determinants of short-term and long-term success in mediation. In S. Worschel & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Conflict between people and groups: Causes, processes, and resolutions. Nelson Hall series in psychology (pp. 60-75). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
29.
Reynolds, K. J., Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). When are we better than them and they worse than us? A closer look at discrimination in positive and negative domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 64-80.
30.
Rothbart, M. (1993). Intergroup perception and social conflict. In S. Worschel & J. A. Simpson (Eds.), Conflict between people and groups: Causes, processes, and resolutions. Nelson Hall series in psychology (pp. 93-109). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
31.
Stephenson, G. M. (1984). Intergroup and interpersonal dimensions of bargaining and negotiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The social dimension (pp. 646-667). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32.
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
33.
Tajfel, H., Flament, C., Billig, M., & Bundy, R. F. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149-177.
34.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worschel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
35.
Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Eds.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6-34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37.
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. New York: Basil Blackwell.
38.
Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237-252.
39.
Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
40.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. (2000). Co-operation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
41.
Tyler, T. R., Degoey, P., & Smith, H. (1996). Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 913-929.
42.
Veenstra, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2000). Willingness to participate in industrial protest: Exploring social identification in context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 153-172.
43.
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994-1003.
