Four studies tested the prototype-matching model that people use the prototype of a good relationship to evaluate the quality of concrete relationships. In Study 1, distance from the consensual prototype of participants’ descriptions of the features of their relationship strongly predicted relationship quality, and this prediction was significantly stronger for distance from central (vs. peripheral) features. Study 2 replicated these results and also found no significant advantage for predicting relationship quality using a relationship’s distance from idiosyncratically weighted (vs. consensually weighted) centrality of prototype features. Study 3 experimentally manipulated a described relation-ship’s distance from the prototype and found that distance from central features affected relationship evaluations more than distance from peripheral or intermediate features. Study 4 experimentally manipulated the prototype of relationship quality itself and found that correlations of relationship quality with matches with the prototype were more strongly influenced by those features that were increased in their importance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aron, A. , & Westbay, L. (1996). Dimensions of the prototype of love. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 535-551.
2.
Bem, D. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic Press.
3.
Burnett, P. (1987). Assessing marital adjustment and satisfaction: A review. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 20, 113-121.
4.
Campbell, W. K. , Sedikides, C., & Bosson, J. (1994). Romantic involvement, self-discrepancy, and psychological well-being: A preliminary investigation. Personal Relationships, 1, 399-404.
5.
Cantor, N. , & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38-48.
6.
Cantor, N. , & Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 3-52). New York: Academic Press.
7.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotype and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5-18.
8.
Fehr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557-579.
9.
Felmlee, D. , Sprecher, S., & Bassin, E. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53, 13-30.
10.
Fincham, F. D. , & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 797-809.
11.
Fletcher, G. J. O. , Simpson, J. A., Thomas, G., & Giles, L. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 72-89.
12.
Forgas, J. P. (1995a). Mood and judgment: The Affect Infusion Model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
13.
Forgas, J. P. (1995b). Strange couples: Mood effects on judgments and memory about prototypical and atypical relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 747-765.
14.
Glenn, N. D. (1990). Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s: A critical review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 818-831.
15.
Griffin, D. , & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430-439.
16.
Haslam, S. A. , Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., & Onorato, R. S. (1995). Contextual changes in the prototypicality of extreme and moderate outgroup members. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 509-530.
17.
Hassebrauck, M. (1991). ZIP: Ein Verfahren zur Erfassung der Zufriedenheit in Paarbeziehungen [ZIP: A method to assess relationship satisfaction]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 22, 256-259.
18.
Hassebrauck, M. (1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their structure and consequences. Personal Relationships, 4, 163-185.
19.
Hassebrauck, M. , & Fehr, B. (1999). Dimensions of relationship quality. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20.
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93-98.
21.
Isen, A. M. , Niedenthal, P. M., & Cantor, N. (1992). An influence of positive affect on social categorization. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 65-78.
22.
Karylowski, J. J. (1990). Social reference points and accessibility of trait-related information in self-other similarity judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 975-983.
23.
Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). New York: Random House.
24.
Mayne, T. J. , OLeary, A., McCrady, B., Contrada, R., & Labouvie, E. (1997). The differential effects of acute marital distress on emotional, physiological and immune functions in maritally distressed men and women. Psychology & Health, 12, 277-288.
25.
Mervis, C. B. , & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89-115.
26.
Murray, S. L. , Holmes, J. G., & Griffin, D. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79-98.
27.
Niedenthal, P. M. , & Mordkoff, J. T. (1991). Prototype distancing: A strategy for choosing among threatening situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 483-493.
28.
Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141-151.
29.
Perry, E. (1994). A prototype matching approach to understanding the role of applicant gender and age in the evaluation of job applicants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1433-1473.
30.
Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328-350.
31.
Russell, J. A. (1991). In defense of a prototype approach to emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 37-47.
32.
Russell, R. J. H. , & Wells, P. A. (1994). Predictors of happiness in married couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 313-321.
33.
Ruvolo, A. P. , & Veroff, J. (1997). For better or for worse: Real-ideal discrepancies and the marital well-being of newlyweds. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 223-242.
34.
Sabatelli, R. M. (1988). Measurement issues in marital research: A review and critique of contemporary survey instruments. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 891-915.
35.
Schumm, W. R. (1990). Intimacy and family values. In J. Touliatos, B. F. Perlmutter, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques (pp. 164-284). London: Sage Ltd.
36.
Setterlund, M. B. , & Niedenthal, P. M. (1993). “Who am I? Why am I here?” Self-esteem, self-clarity, and prototype matching. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 769-780.
37.
Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 145-251.
38.
Thibaut, J. , & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: John Wiley.
39.
Traupmann, J. , & Hatfield, E. (1981). Love and its effect on mental and physical health. In R. Fogel, E. Hatfield, S. Kiesler, & E. Shanas (Eds.), Aging: Stability and change in the family (pp. 253-274). New York: Academic Press.
40.
Wickrama, K. A. S. , Lorenz, F. O., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (1997). Marital quality and physical illness: A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 143-155.
