In four studies, the authors show that interpretation goals facilitate accessibility and stereotyping effects. Study 1 shows that priming traits that are descriptively inapplicable to a target stimulus affect target interpretations when an interpretation goal is primed but not when no such goal is present. Studies 2 and 3 show that the range of judgment dimensions affected by applicable trait primes increases when people are interpretation motivated. Studies 3 and 4 show that behavior that is only weakly related to stereotypical beliefs is interpreted in stereotypical terms when an interpretation goal is activated, whereas no such stereotyping effect occurs when perceivers are not so motivated. Implications for models of accessibility and stereotyping effects are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Banaji, M. R. , Hardin, C., & Rothman, A. J. (1993). Implicit stereotyping in person judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 272-281.
2.
Bargh, J. A. (1997). The automaticity of everyday life. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Bargh, J. A. , Gollwitzer, P. M., & Barndollar, K. (1996). Social ignition: The automatic activation of motivational states. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
5.
Bock, M. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Bodenhausen, G. V. , Macrae, C. N., & Sherman, J. W. (1999). On the dialectics of discrimination: Dual processes in social stereotyping. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 271-292). New York: Guilford.
7.
Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In H. E. Gruber, K. R. Hammond, & R. Jessor (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41-69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Ford, T. E. , & Kruglanski, A. W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950-962.
10.
Hamilton, D. L. , & Sherman, J. W. (1994). Stereotypes. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 1-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Hampson, S. E. , John, O. P., & Goldberg, L. R. (1986). Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: Studies in asymetries in judgments of trait implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 37-54.
12.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
13.
Higgins, E. T. , & Brendl, C. M. (1995). Accessibility and applicability: Some “activation rules” influencing judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 218-243.
14.
Higgins, E. T. , Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
15.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
16.
Kunda, Z. , & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
17.
Martin, L. L. , Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R. A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people’s willingness and ability to expand effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
18.
Neter, J. , Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. (1985). Applied linear statistical models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
19.
Norusis, M. J. (1997). SPSS 6.1: Guide to data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20.
Petty, R. E. , & Jarvis, A.B.G. (1996). An individual differences perspective on assessing cognitive processes. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 221-258). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21.
Sagar, H. A. , & Schofield, J. W. (1980). Racial and behavioral cues in Black and White children’s perceptions of ambiguously aggressive acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 590-598.
22.
Sedikides, C. (1990). Effects of fortuitously activated constructs versus activated communication goals on person impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 397-408.
23.
Srull, T. K. , & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
24.
Stapel, D. A. , & Koomen, W. (1998). When stereotype activation results in (counter)stereotypical judgments: Priming stereotype-relevant traits and exemplars. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 136-163.
25.
Stapel, D. A. , & Koomen, W. (1999). Determinants of the direction of context effects. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
26.
Stapel, D. A. , & Koomen, W. (2000). How far do we go beyond the information given? The impact of knowledge activation on interpretation and inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 19-37.
27.
Stapel, D. A. , & Koomen, W. (2001). Let’s not forget the past when we go to the future: On our knowledge of knowledge accessibility effects. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 229-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Stapel, D. A. , Koomen, W., & Zeelenberg, M. (1998). The impact of accuracy motivation on interpretation, comparison, and correction processes: Accuracy Motivation × Knowledge Accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 878-893.
29.
Thompson, E. P. , Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474-489.
30.
Wyer, R. S. , & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and social cognition in its social context. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
