This study investigated conflicts between beliefs about deservingness and beliefs about entitlement. Eighty-nine nurses in a psychiatric hospital rated schizophrenic and personality disorder patients on 28 bipolar adjective scales and then responded to scenarios in which an aggressive action by these patients was followed by either a positive or negative response from a nurse. Results showed that participants’ ratings of deservingness and positive affect about the nurse’s response favored the schizophrenic patient over the personality disorder patient when each patient was treated positively. These differences were smaller and in the reverse direction when each patient was treated negatively by the nurse. These results imply that differences in these variables were more likely to occur when basic entitlements concerning care and support were met. Further multivariate analyses showed that deservingness mediated the effects of anger and sympathy on reported positive affect about the nurse’s response and significantly enhanced prediction beyond patients’ perceived responsibility for the aggressive episode.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 82, 85-113.
2.
Crosby, F. (1982). Relative deprivation and working women. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4.
Feather, N. T. (1994). Attitudes toward high achievers and reactions to their fall. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 1-73). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
5.
Feather, N. T. (1996a). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571-587.
6.
Feather, N. T. (1996b). Values, deservingness, and attitudes toward high achievers: Research on tall poppies. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8, pp.215-251). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Feather, N. T. (1998). Reactions to penalties committed by the police and public citizens: Testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 528-544.
8.
Feather, N. T. (1999a). Judgments of deservingness: Studies in the psychology of justice and achievement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 86-107.
9.
Feather, N. T. (1999b). Values, achievement, and justice: Studies in the psychology of deservingness. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
10.
Feather, N. T. (2001). Deservingness, entitlement, and reactions to outcomes. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Feather, N. T. , & Oberdan, D. (2000). Reactions to penalties for an offence in relation to ethnic identity, responsibility, and authoritarianism. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52, 9-16.
12.
Feinberg, J. (1970). Doing and deserving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Gallop, R. , Lancee, W., & Garfinkel, P. (1989). How nursing staff respond to the label “Borderline Personality Disorder”. Hospital and Community Psychology, 40, 815-819.
14.
Graham, S. , Weiner, B., & Zucker, G. S. (1997). An attributional analysis of punishment goals and public reactions to O. J. Simpson. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 331-346.
15.
Heath, A. (1976). Rational choice and social exchange. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
17.
Lerner, J. S. , Goldberg, J. H., & Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Sober second thought: The effects of accountability, anger, and authoritarianism on attributions of responsibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 563-574.
18.
Lerner, M. J. (1987). Integrating societal and psychological rules of entitlement: The basic task of each social actor and fundamental problem for the social sciences. Social Justice Research, 1, 107-125.
19.
Lewis, G. ,& Appleby, L. (1988). Personality disorder: The patients psychiatrists dislike. British Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 44-49.
20.
MacCallum, R. C. , Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
21.
Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). New York: Academic Press.
22.
Mikula, G. (1993). On the experience of injustice. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 223-244.
23.
Parkinson, B. (1997). Untangling the appraisal-emotion connection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 62-79.
24.
Schwarz, N. , & Clore, G. T. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 433-463). New York: Guilford.
25.
Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame: Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York: Springer-Verlag.
26.
Shultz, T. R. , & Darley, J. M. (1991). An information-processing model of retributive justice based on “legal reasoning”. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development: Research (Vol. 2, pp. 247-278). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27.
Skitka, L. J. , & Tetlock, P. E. (1992). Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 491-522.
28.
Steil, J. M. (1994). Equality and fairness in marriage. In M. J. Lerner & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond: Justice in close relationships (pp. 229-258). New York: Plenum.
29.
von Hirsch, A. (1986). Doing justice: The choice of punishments. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
30.
Weiner, B. (1993). On sin and sickness: A theory of perceived responsibility and social motivation. American Psychologist, 48, 957-965.
31.
Weiner, B. (1995). Judgments of responsibility: A foundation for a theory of social conduct. New York: Guilford.
32.
Zajonc, R. B. (1998). Emotions. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 591-634). New York: Oxford University Press.
