Some models of attitude have speculated that affectively based attitudes are more accessible than cognitively based attitudes. However, there are also reasons to expect that affectively based attitudes may not be generally faster and that any accessibility advantage would hold only at high levels of attitude extremity. Two studies of attitudes with affective and cognitive structural bases examined this possibility. In both studies, no overall effect of attitude basis on extremity emerged, but attitude extremity did moderate the effects of basis. Affectively based attitudes were expressed faster than cognitively based ones only when attitudes were more extreme, and they tended to be expressed more slowly when attitudes were less extreme. These results may have arisen because only strong affect is seen as more diagnostic of true attitude, producing faster responses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abelson, R. P. (1995). Statistics as principled argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798-844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.
3.
Bargh, J. A. , Chaiken, S., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic evaluation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 893-912.
4.
Bassili, J. N. (1993). Response latency versus certainty as indexes of the strength of voting intentions in a CATI survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 57, 54-61.
5.
Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 71, 637-653.
6.
Bassili, J. N. , & Fletcher, J. (1991). Response-time measurement in survey research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 55, 331-346.
7.
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191-1205.
8.
Breckler, S. J. , & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 253-271.
9.
Breckler, S. J. , & Wiggins, E. C. (1991). Cognitive responses in persuasion: Affective and evaluative determinants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 384-389.
10.
Chaiken, S. , & Giner-Sorolla, R. (1992). [Structural consistency and accessibility]. Unpublished raw data.
11.
Chaiken, S. , Pomerantz, E. M., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (1995). Structural consistency and attitude strength. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 387-412). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13.
Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and Discontent (pp. 206-261). New York: Free Press.
14.
Crites, S. L. , Fabrigar, L., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 619-634.
15.
Downing, J. D. , Jacobson, J. A., & Brock, T. C. (May, 1998). The persistence of affectively-versus cognitively-based real world attitudes. Poster session presented at the 10th meeting of the American Psychological Society, Washington, DC.
16.
Edwards, K. (1990). The interplay of affect and cognition in attitude formation and change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 202-216.
17.
Edwards, K. , & von Hippel, W. (1995). Hearts and minds: The priority of affective versus cognitive factors in person perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 996-1011.
18.
Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of accessibility. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Fazio, R. H. (1990). A practical guide to the use of response latency in research. In C. Hendrick & M. S. Clark (Eds.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 74-97). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Fazio, R. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247-282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Fazio, R. H. , Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013-1027.
22.
Fazio, R. H. , & Powell, M. C. (1992). [The emotionality of evaluations]. Unpublished raw data. Cited in Fazio (1995).
23.
Fazio, R. H. , & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 505-514.
24.
Giner-Sorolla, R. (1999). Affect in attitude: Immediate and deliberative perspectives. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 441-461). New York: Guilford.
25.
Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
Greenwald, A. G. , McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
27.
Houston, D. A. , & Fazio, R. H. (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51-66.
28.
Jacoby, L. L. , & Kelley, C. M. (1990). An episodic view of motivation: Unconscious influences of memory. In E. T. Higgins & R. M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 451-481).
29.
Judd, C. M. , & Kulik, J. A. (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 569-578.
30.
Katz, D. , & Stotland, E. (1959). A preliminary statement to a theory of attitude structure and change. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 3, pp. 423-475). New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Kenny, D. A. , Bolger, N., & Kashy, D. A. (1997). Estimation of multilevel models using weighted least squares. Unpublished paper, University of Connecticut.
32.
Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D, A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert & S. T. Fiske (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
33.
Krosnick, J. A. , Betz, A. L., Jussim, L. J., & Lynn, A. R. (1992). Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 152-162.
34.
Krosnick, J. A. , & Petty, R. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.,) Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1-24). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35.
Kunst-Wilson, W. R. , & Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
36.
Millar, M. J. , & Millar, K. U. (1990). Attitude change as a function of attitude type and argument type. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 217-228.
37.
Millar, M. J. , & Millar, K. U. (1996). The effects of direct and indirect experience on affective and cognitive responses and the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 561-579.
38.
Millar, M. J. , & Tesser, A. (1986). Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270-276.
39.
Murphy, S. T. , & Zajonc, R. B. (1993). Affect, cognition and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 723-739.
40.
Ostrom, T. M. (1969). The relationship between the affective, behavioral and cognitive components of attitude. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 12-30.
41.
Pomerantz, E. M. , Chaiken, S., & Tordesillas, R. S. (1995). Attitude strength and resistance processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 408-419.
42.
Raden, D. (1985). Strength-related attitude dimensions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 312-330.
43.
Rosenberg, M. J. (1960). An analysis of affective-cognitive consistency. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 15-64). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Rosenberg, M. J. , & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components of attitudes. In C. I. Hovland & M. J. Rosenberg (Eds.), Attitude organization and change: An analysis of consistency among attitude components (pp. 1-14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
45.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. , & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object’s attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63, 198-211.
46.
SAS 6.02 [Computer software] (1988). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
47.
Smith, E. R. (1989). Procedural efficiency: General and specific components and effects on social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 500-523.
48.
Smith, M. B. (1947). The personal setting of public opinions: A study of attitudes toward Russia. Public Opinion Quarterly, 11, 507-523.
49.
Stangor, C. , Sullivan, L. A., & Ford, T. L. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359-380.
50.
Thompson, M. M. , Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.,) Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361-386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
Verplanken, B. , Hofstee, G., & Janssen, H. J. W. (1998). Accessibility of affective versus cognitive components of attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 23-35.
52.
Wilson, T. D. , Schooler, T. Y., & Lindsey, S. (1998). A model of dual attitudes. Manuscript submitted for publication.
53.
Winkielman, P. , Zajonc, R. B., & Schwarz, N. (1997). Subliminal affective priming resists attributional interventions. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 433-465.
54.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
55.
Zanna, M. P. , & Rempel, J. K. (1988). Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), The social psychology of knowledge (pp. 315-334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
