Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Contestants playing the Minnesota Jeopardy game chose positions in a 3 × 3 seating arrangement in anticipation of the competition. More visible seats were selected when contestants expected to perform well than when they expected to perform poorly. Mediation analyses suggest that performance expectations affected the desire to be noticed, which, in turn, affected the salience of the seat that was assumed. The findings suggest that people manipulate their salience as a function of their performance expectations to influence the impressions of others. The study introduces an important and possibly ubiquitous self-presentation technique that has been largely neglected by the psychological literature.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

Cialdini, R. B. , Borden, R. J. , Thorne, A. , Walker, M. R. , Freeman, S. , & Sloan, L. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366-375.

Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gump, P. (1987). School and classroom environments. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 698-701). New York: John Wiley.

Jones, E. E. , & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives of the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231-262). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Jones, E. E. , & Wortman, C. (1973). Ingratiation: An attributional approach. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Lord, C. G. , & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 918-926.

McArthur, L. Z. (1981). What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution. In E. T. Higgins , C. P. Herman , & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 201-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

10.

Mercincavage, J. E. , & Brooks, C. I. (1990). Differences in achievement motivation of college business majors as a function of year in college and classroom seating position. Psychological Reports, 66, 632-624.

11.

Pedersen, D. M. (1977). Relationship of ratings of classroom performance and enjoyment with seat selection. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 64, 1287-1300.

12.

Reiss, M. , & Rosenfeld, P. (1980). Seating preferences as nonverbal communication: A self-presentational analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 8, 22-30.

13.

Rhodewalt, F. , & Davison, J., Jr. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attributional certainty. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 307-322.

14.

Sanbonmatsu, D. M. , Shavitt, S. , & Gibson, B. D. (1994). Salience, set size, and illusory correlation: Making moderate assumptions about extreme targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1020-1033.

15.

Sommer, R. (1967). Classroom ecology. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 3, 489-503.

16.

Taylor, S. E. , & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Salience, attention, and attribution: Top of the head phenomena. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 249-288). New York: Academic Press.

Manipulating Personal Salience: The Effects of Performance Expectations on Physical Positioning

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References