This study examined the role of affiliative orientation as a dispositional antecedent of appraisals of motivational relevance and related emotions. Individuals high and low on affiliative orientation attempted to complete a teaching task that proved to be interpersonally challenging, and their appraisals and emotions were assessed both while anticipating the task and after its completion. Results indicated that before the task occurred, high levels of affiliative orientation were related to emphasizing the affiliative relevance of the situation, appraising the interpersonal aspects of the situation as being especially important, and experiencing higher levels of interest and lower levels of boredom. Path analyses indicated that the interrelations among these variables were consistent with an a priori causal model of appraisal-emotion relations. Posttask, very few effects of affiliative orientation on appraisal, emotion, or the participants' behaviors during the task were observed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Atkinson, J. W. (1982). Motivational determinants of thematic apperception. In A. J. Stewart (Ed.), Motivation and society (pp. 3-40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
Atkinson, J. W. (1983). Personality, motivation, and action: Selected papers. New York: Praeger.
3.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
4.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
5.
Bentler, P. M. , & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
6.
Bentler, P. M. , & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for Macintosh user's guide. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
7.
Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In H. Gruber, K. R. Hammond, & R. Jesser (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41-69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Buss, D. M. (1987). Selection, evocation, and manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1214-1221.
9.
Cantor, N. , & Zirkel, S. (1990). Personality, cognition, and purposive behavior. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 135-164). New York: Guilford.
10.
Deci, E. L. , & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
11.
Dweck, C. S. , & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
12.
Ellsworth, P. C. (1991). Some implications of cognitive appraisal theories of emotion. In K. T. Strongman (Ed.), International review of studies of emotion (Vol. 1, pp. 143-161). New York: John Wiley.
13.
Ellsworth, P. C. , & Smith, C. A. (1988). From appraisal to emotion: Differences among unpleasant feelings. Motivation and Emotion, 12, 271-302.
14.
Emmons, R. A. (1993). The current status of the motive concept. In K. H. Craik, R. Hogan, & R. N. Wolfe (Eds.), Fifty years of personality psychology (pp. 187-196). New York: Plenum.
15.
Emmons, R. A. , Diener, E., & Larsen, R. J. (1986). Choice and avoidance of everyday situations and affect congruence: Two models of reciprocal interactionism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 815-826.
16.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Frijda, N. H. , Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212-228.
18.
Funder, D. C. (1991). Global traits: A neo-Allportian approach to personality. Psychological Science, 2, 31-39.
19.
Higgins, E. T. (1990). Personality, social psychology, and person-situation relations: Standards and knowledge activation as a common language. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 301-338). New York: Guilford.
20.
Jackson, D. N. (1967). Personality Research Form manual. Goshen, NY: Research Psychologists Press.
21.
Kenrick, D. T. , & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
22.
Lazarus, R. S. (1968). Emotions and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. In W. J. Arnold (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 175-266). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
23.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
24.
McAdams, D. P. , & Constantian, C. A. (1983). Intimacy and affiliation motives in daily living: An experience sampling analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 851-861.
25.
McAdams, D. P. , & Powers, J. (1981). Themes of intimacy in behavior and thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 573-587.
26.
McClelland, D. C. (1971). Assessing human motivation. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
27.
McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
Novacek, J. , & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). The structure of personal commitments. Journal of Personality, 58, 693-715.
30.
Palys, T. S. , & Little, B. R. (1983). Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal project systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1221-1230.
31.
Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. In P. Shaver (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 5. Emotions, relationships, and health (pp. 11-36). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
32.
Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 161-200.
33.
Roseman, I. J. , Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 899-915.
34.
Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293-317). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
Scherer, K. R. (1997). Profiles of emotion-antecedent appraisal: Testing theoretical predictions across cultures. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 113-150.
36.
Smith, C. A. (1991). The self, appraisal, and coping. In C. R. Synder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 116-137). New York: Pergamon.
37.
Smith, C. A. , & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 813-838.
38.
Smith, C. A. , Haynes, K. N., Lazarus, R. S., & Pope, L. K. (1993). In search of the “hot” cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 916-929.
39.
Smith, C. A. , & Lazarus, R. S. (1990). Emotion and adaptation. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 609-637). New York: Guilford.
40.
Smith, C. A. , & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7, 233-269.
41.
Smith, C. A. , & Pope, L. K. (1992). Appraisal and emotion: The interactional contributions of dispositional and situational factors. In M. S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, Volume 14: Emotions and social behavior (pp. 32-62). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Veroff, J. , Reuman, D., & Feld, S. (1984). Motives in American men and women across the adult life span. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1142-1158.
44.
Winter, D. G. , John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230-250.
