The current study explores two classes of strategies of coping with accountability: low-cognitive-effort decision-evasion tactics (buckpassing, procrastination, and exiting the situation) and high-cognitive-effort attempts to craft integratively complex compromises among conflicting perspectives. Some participants read weak arguments on one side of the free trade issue and strong arguments on the other side, and some participants read strong arguments for both the pro-and anti-free trade positions. They then expected their own views to be anonymous or expected to justify those views to a pro-free trade audience or to both a pro-and an anti-free trade audience. Participants were most integratively complex when they read strong arguments from each side and were accountable to conflicting constituencies (maximum intrapsychic and interpersonal conflict). Participants also relied on low-effort decision-evasion tactics to escape accountability and were willing to use escape strategies demanding relatively more time and energy to avoid accountability to contradictory constituencies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brewer, M. B. (1989). A dual process model of impression formation. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.
3.
Cacioppo, J. T. , Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
4.
Chaiken, S. (1981). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752-766.
5.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 11-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Cialdini, R. B. , Levy, A., Herman, P., Kozlowski, L., & Petty, R. E. (1976). Elastic shifts of opinion: Determinants of direction and durability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 663-672.
7.
Fiske, S. T. , & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
8.
Fiske, S. T. , & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
Huckfeldt, R. R. , Beck, P. A., Dalton, R., & Levine, J. (1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 1025-1054.
10.
Janis, I. L. , & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
11.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.”Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283.
12.
Kruglanski, A. W. , Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 861-876.
13.
Lerner, J. S. , & Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 255-275.
14.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially-desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(11), 598-609.
15.
Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes: Measures of social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 17-59). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
16.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
17.
Schlenker, B. R. (1982). Translating actions into attitudes: An identity-analytic approach to the explanation of social conduct. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 193-247). New York: Academic Press.
18.
Schlenker, B. R. (1985). Identity and self-identification. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.), The self and social life (pp. 65-99). New York: McGraw-Hill.
19.
Schlenker, B. R. , Weigold, M. F., & Doherty, K. (1991). Coping with accountability: Self-identification and evaluative reckonings. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology (pp. 96-115). New York: Pergamon.
20.
Schwartz, N. (1994). Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 123-162). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21.
Suedfeld, P. (1992). Cognitive managers and their critics. Political Psychology, 13(11), 435-453.
22.
Tetlock, P. E. (1985). Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 297-332). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
23.
Tetlock, P. E. (1992). The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 331-376). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Tetlock, P. E. (1998). Close-call counterfactuals and belief system defenses: I was not almost wrong but I was almost right. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(11), 639-652.
25.
Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accountability theory: Mixing properties of human agents with properties of social systems. In J. Levine, L. Thompson, & D. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Tetlock, P. E. (in press). Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder?Administrative Science Quarterly.
27.
Tetlock, P. E. , Armor, D., & Peterson, R. S. (1994). The slavery debate in antebellum America: Cognitive style, value conflict, and the limits of compromise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 115-126.
28.
Tetlock, P. E. , & Boettger, R. (1989). Accountability: A social magnifier of the dilution effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(11), 388-398.
29.
Tetlock, P. E. , & Boettger, R. (1994). Accountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims. Journal of Behavioral Decision-Making, 7, 1-23.
30.
Tetlock, P. E. , & Hannum, K. (1988). Integrative complexity coding manual. Unpublished manuscript, The Ohio State University.
31.
Tetlock, P. E. , Lerner, J. S., & Boettger, R. (1996). The dilution effect: Judgmental bias, conversational convention, or a bit of both?European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 915-934.
32.
Tetlock, P. E. , Skitka, L., & Boettger, R. (1989). Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 632-640.
33.
Vallone, R. P. , Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perception of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(11), 577-585.
