Two experiments examined the generality of the negativity bias, the tendency of perceivers to regard immoral behaviors as more informative or diagnostic about an individual’s personal traits than moral behaviors. Both experiments yielded results indicating that perceivers are prone to the bias when information about others is inconsistent in its moral implications but not when information is consistent. Two category-based explanations for the results were considered, one postulating a two-stage process and the other proposing a simpler process that emphasizes the activation of perceivers’ character schemas. The results of both experiments suggest that the negativity bias, although prevalent, is not as pervasive as sometimes thought to be and that character appraisals, once made, are not immutable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. , & Jacobsen, A. (1965). Effect of stimulus discounting instructions in personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 531-539.
2.
Aquinas, T. (1955). Summa theologica. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica. (Original work written 1265-1274)
3.
Aristotle . (1950). Ethics. New York: Dutton.
4.
Bennett, W. J. (Ed.). (1993). The book of virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster.
5.
Betz, A. L. , Gannon, K. M., & Skowronski, J. J. (1992). The moment of tenure and the moment of truth: When it pays to be aware of recency effects in social judgments. Social Cognition, 10, 397-413.
6.
Birkby, R. C. (1990). The Boy Scout handbook (10th ed.). Irving, TX: Boy Scouts of America.
7.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1972). Morality judgments: Tests of an averaging model. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 93, 35-42.
8.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1973). Morality judgment: Test of an averaging model with differential weights. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 99, 395-399.
9.
Briscoe, M. E. , Woodyard, H. D., & Shaw, M. E. (1967). Personality impression change as a function of favorableness of first impressions. Journal of Personality, 35, 343-357.
10.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Coovert, M. D. , & Reeder, G. D. (1990). Negativity effects in impression formation: The role of unit formation and schematic expectations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 49-62.
12.
Cusumano, D. R. , & Richey, M. H. (1970). Negative salience in impressions of character: Effect of extremeness of stimulus information. Psychonomic Science, 20, 81-83.
13.
Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906.
14.
Gannon, K. M. , Skowronski, J. J., & Betz, A. L. (1994). Depressive diligence in social information procession: Implications for order effects in impressions and for social memory. Social Cognition, 12, 263-280.
15.
Green, E. (1927). A good man is hard to find. [Recorded by Bessie Smith]. On Bessie Smith, the empress [LP]. New York: Columbia Records.
16.
Hamilton, D. L. , & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
17.
Hastie, R. (1984). Causal attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
18.
Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper.
19.
Jones, E. E. , & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220-266). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Jones, E. E. , & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. Harvey, W. Ickes, & R. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 390-420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Lupfer, M. B. , & Gingrich, B. E. (1999). When bad (good) things happen to good (bad) people: The impact of character appraisal and perceived controllability on judgments of deservingness. Social Justice Research, 12, 165-188.
22.
Martijn, C. , Spears, R., Van der Pligt, J., & Jakobs, E. (1992). Negativity and positivity effects in person perception and inference: Ability versus morality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 453-463.
23.
Miller, W. (1998, December 20). Wiley’s non sequitur. The Washington Post, Comics, Section 1, p. 1.
24.
Newman, L. S. (1996). Trait impressions as heuristics for predicting future behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 395-411.
25.
Reeder, G. D. , & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
26.
Reeder, G. D. , & Coovert, M. D. (1986). Revising an impression of morality. Social Cognition, 4, 1-17.
27.
Richey, M. H. , & Dwyer, J. D. (1970). Negative salience in impression of character: Sex differences. Psychonomic Science, 20, 77-79.
28.
Richey, M. H. , McClelland, L., & Shimkunas, A. M. (1967). Relative influence of positive and negative information in impression formation and persistence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 322-327.
29.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.
30.
Ross, L. , & Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Rothbart, M. , & Park, B. (1986). On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 131-142.
32.
Sherif, M. , & Sherif, C. W. (1967). Attitudes as the individual’s own categories: The social judgment approach to attitude change. In C. W. Sherif & M. Sherif (Eds.), Attitude, ego involvement, and change (pp. 105-139). New York: John Wiley.
33.
Skowronski, J. J. (1984/1985). Explaining negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A categorization-cue validity approach. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International (B), 46, DA8507984.
34.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1987). Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 689-699.
35.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
36.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carlston, D. E. (1992). Caught in the act: When impressions based on highly diagnostic behaviors are resistant to contradiction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 435-452.
37.
Wyer, R. S. (1973). Category ratings for “subjective expected values”: Implications for attitude formation and change. Psychological Review, 80, 446-467.
38.
Wyer, R. S. (1974). Cognitive organization and change: An information processing approach. Potomac, MD: Lawrence Erlbaum.
39.
Wynne, E. A. (1985/1986). The great tradition in education: Transmitting moral values. Educational Leadership, 43(4), 4-9.
40.
Yoon, G. H. Y. , & Richey, M. H. (1981). Valence and position of inconsistent information in impression formation. Social Behavior and Personality, 9, 107-111.
