Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2000-12
Cognitive Dissonance and Experienced Negative Affect: Evidence that Dissonance Increases Experienced Negative Affect Even in the Absence of Aversive Consequences
Research has suggested that the dissonance produced in the induced compliance paradigm is accompanied by experienced negative affect. This research, however, used a paradigm in which participants’ counterattitudinal action had the potential to bring about an aversive consequence, thus leaving the question of whether the dissonance produced in the absence of aversive consequences causes increased negative affect. Results from two experiments demonstrated that individuals report more negative affect following freely choosing (high choice) than following being told (low choice) to write a counterattitudinal statement that would produce no aversive consequences. The second experiment also demonstrated that the negative affect is reduced following attitude change and eliminated an alternative explanation of similar, past experiments. Discussion focuses on the implications of these findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W. J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5-27). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2.
Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303-311.
3.
Aronson, E. (1999). Dissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 103-126). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
Aronson, E. , Ellsworth, P. C., Carlsmith, J. M., & Gonzales, M. H. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
Baron, R. A. , Byrne, D., & Johnson, B. T. (1998). Exploring social psychology (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
7.
Beauvois, J. L. , & Joule, R. V. (1996). A radical dissonance theory. London: Taylor & Francis.
8.
Beauvois, J. L. , & Joule, R. V. (1999). A radical point of view on dissonance theory. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 43-70). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
Berkowitz, L. , & Devine, P. G. (1989). Research traditions, analysis, and synthesis in social psychological theories: The case of dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 493-507.
10.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic Press.
11.
Brehm, J. W. , & Cohen, A. R. (1962). Explorations in cognitive dissonance. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Burris, C. T. , Harmon-Jones, E., & Tarpley, W. R. (1997). “By faith alone”: Religious agitation and cognitive dissonance. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 19, 17-31.
13.
Cacioppo, J. T. , & Gardner, W. L. (1999). Emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 191-214.
14.
Calder, B. J. , Ross, M., & Insko, C. A. (1973). Attitude change and attitude attribution: Effects of incentive, choice, and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 84-99.
15.
Collins, B. E. (1969). Attribution theory analysis of forced compliance. Proceedings of the 77th annual convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 309-310.
16.
Cooper, J. , & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 17, pp. 229-264). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17.
Cooper, J. , & Worchel, S. (1970). Role of undesired consequences in arousing cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 199-206.
18.
Devine, P. G. , Tauer, J. M., Barron, K. E., Elliot, A. J., & Vance, K. M. (1999). Moving beyond attitude change in the study of dissonance-related processes. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 297-323). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
19.
Eagly, A. H. , & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
20.
Elliot, A. J. , & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382-394.
21.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22.
Festinger, L. , & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
23.
Forgas, J. P. (in press). Handbook of affect and social cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
Frijda, N. H. , Manstead, A. R. S., & Bem, S. (in press). The effects of emotions upon the formation and strength of beliefs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Harmon-Jones, E. (1999). Toward an understanding of the motivation underlying dissonance: Is the production of aversive consequences necessary to produce dissonance? In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 71-99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26.
Harmon-Jones, E. (in press). A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on the role of emotion in the maintenance and change of beliefs and attitudes. In N. H. Frijda, A. R. S. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), The effects of emotions upon the formation and strength of beliefs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Harmon-Jones, E. (2000). An update on dissonance theory, with a focus on the self. In A. Tesser, R. Felson, & J. Suls (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on self and identity (pp. 119-144). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
28.
Harmon-Jones, E. , Brehm, J. W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L., & Nelson, D. E. (1996). Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 5-16.
29.
Harmon-Jones, E. , & Mills, J. (1999). Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30.
Heatherton, T. F. , & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895-910.
31.
Higgins, E. T. , Rhodewalt, F., & Zanna, M. P. (1979). Dissonance motivation: Its nature, persistence, and reinstatement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 16-34.
32.
Jones, E. E. (1985). Major developments in social psychology during the past five decades. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 47-108). New York: Random House.
33.
Judd, C. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
35.
Kidd, R. F. , & Berkowitz, L. (1976). Effect of dissonance arousal on helpfulness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 613-622.
36.
Kiesler, C. A. , & Pallak, M. S. (1976). Arousal properties of dissonance manipulations. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1014-1025.
37.
Losch, M. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Cognitive dissonance may enhance sympathetic tonus, but attitudes are changed to reduce negative affect rather than arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 289-304.
38.
McGregor, I. , Newby-Clark, I., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). “Remembering” dissonance: Simultaneous accessibility of inconsistent cognitive elements moderates epistemic discomfort. In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 325-353). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39.
Nel, E. , Helmreich, R., & Aronson, E. (1969). Opinion change in the advocate as a function of the persuasibility of his audience: A clarification of the meaning of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 117-124.
40.
Olson, J. M. , & Zanna, M. P. (1979). A new look at selective exposure. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 1-15.
41.
Pyszczynski, T. , Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Sideris, J., & Stubing, M. J. (1993). Emotional expression and the reduction of motivated cognitive bias: Evidence from cognitive dissonance and distancing from victims’ paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 177-186.
42.
Rabbie, J. M. , Brehm, J. W., & Cohen, A. R. (1959). Verbalization and reactions to cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality, 27, 407-417.
43.
Rhodewalt, F. , & Comer, R. (1979). Induced-compliance attitude change: Once more with feeling. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 35-47.
44.
Rosenthal, R. , & Rosnow, R. L. (1985). Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
Scheier, M. F. , & Carver, C. S. (1980). Private and public self-attention, resistance to change, and dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 390-405.
46.
Shaffer, D. R. (1975). Some effects of consonant and dissonant attitudinal advocacy on initial attitude salience and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 160-168.
47.
Simon, L. , Greenberg, J., & Brehm, J. W. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247-260.
48.
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
49.
Stone, J. , Aronson, E., Crain, A. L., Winslow, M. P., & Fried, C. B. (1994). Inducing hypocrisy as a means for encouraging young adults to use condoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 116-128.
50.
Taylor, S. E. , Peplau, L. A., & Sears, D. O. (2000). Social psychology (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
51.
Watson, D. , & Clark, L. A. (1991). The PANAS-X: Preliminary Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Unpublished manuscript, Southern Methodist University.
52.
Weinberger, D. A. , Schwartz, G. E., & Davidson, R. J. (1979). Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 369-380.
53.
Wicklund, R. A. , & Brehm, J. W. (1976). Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
Zanna, M. P. , & Cooper, J. (1974). Dissonance and the pill: An attribution approach to studying the arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 703-709.
