The authors present and test a model of schismatic processes in social groups. According to this model, schismatic intentions are caused by the perception that a proposed new norm fundamentally changes a central aspect of group identity. Also, the impact of this perception on schismatic intentions is mediated by the belief that group identity has been subverted, whose effect on schismatic intentions is, in turn, mediated by perceived inability to voice dissent and perceived lack of group entitativity. Data from officials of the Church of England who are against the ordination of women to the priesthood (N = 211) fit the predicted model.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aron, A. , & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2001). Including others in the self: Extensions to own and partner’s group membership. In C. Sedikides & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Individual self, relational self, collective self (pp. 89-108). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
2.
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
3.
Bentler, P. M. , & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
4.
Blasi, A. J. (1989). Sociological implications of the Great Western Schism. Social Compass, 36, 311-325.
5.
Branscombe, N. R. , Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6.
Browne, M. W. , & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
8.
Cartwright, D. , & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory (3rd ed.). London: Tavistick Publications.
9.
Defrance, J. (1989). Un schisme sportif. Clivages structurels, scissions et oppositions dans les sports athletiques, 1960-1980. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 79, 76-96.
10.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
11.
Gaertner, S. L. , Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-26). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12.
Gaertner, S. L. , Mann, J.Murrel, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (1989). Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 239-249.
13.
Hamilton, D. L. , Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Shopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Haslam, S. A. , Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., & Eggins, R. A. (1996). Stereotyping and social influence: The mediation of stereotype applicability and sharedness by the views of ingroup and outgroup members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35a, 369-397.
15.
Haslam, S. A. , Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. J. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 203-239). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
16.
Hassan, M. (1993). India’s partition. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
17.
Hogg, M. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the small group. In E. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (pp. 227-253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Hogg, M. , & Mullin, B.-A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249-279). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
19.
Hornsey, M. J. , & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and diversity: An integrative model of subgroup relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 143-156.
20.
Husbands, C. T. (1988). Extreme Right-Wing politics in Great Britain: The recent marginalisation of the national front. West European Politics, 11, 65-79.
21.
Jöreskog, K. G. , & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8 user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
22.
Kenny, D. A. (2001). SEM: Measures of fit. Retrieved from http://users.rcn.com/dakenny/fit.htm
23.
Liebman, R. C. , Sutton, J. R., & Wuthnow, R. (1988). Exploring the social sources of denominationalism: Schisms in American Protestant denominations, 1890-1980. American Sociological Review, 53, 343-352.
24.
Lind, E. A. , Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
25.
MacCallum, R. C. , & Austin, J. T. (2000). Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 201-226.
26.
Mamiya, L. H. (1982). From Black Muslim to Bilalian: The evolution of a movement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 21, 138-152.
27.
Nemeth, C. , & Staw, B. M. (1989). The tradeoffs of social control and innovation in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 175-210). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28.
Prentice, D. A. , Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.
29.
Rochford, E. , & Burke, J. (1989). Factionalism, group defection, and schism in the Hare Krishna movement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 28, 162-179.
30.
Sani, F. , & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 623-645.
31.
Sani, F. , & Reicher, S. (1999). Identity, argument and schism: Two longitudinal studies of the split in the Church of England over the ordination of women to the priesthood. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 279-300.
32.
Sani, F. , & Reicher, S. (2000). Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 95-112.
33.
Savoye, A. (1981). Les Continuateurs de Le Play au tournant du siecle. Revue Francaise de Sociologie, 22, 315-344.
34.
Sherman, S. J. , Hamilton, D. L., & Lewis, A. C. (1999). Perceived entitativity and the social identity value of group membership. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 80-110). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
35.
Smith, E. R. , & Henry, S. (1996). An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 635-642.
36.
Solomon, S. , Greenberg, J., & Pyszcsynzsky, T. (1991). A terror management theory of social behavior: The psychological functions of self-esteem and cultural world-views. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 93-159). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups. London: Academic Press.
38.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Turner, J. C. , Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
40.
Turner, J. C. , Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454-463.
41.
Worchel, S. (1984). A model of achieving group independence. Paper presented at the XXXIII International Congress of Psychology, Acapulco, Mexico.
42.
Yzerbyt, V. , Castano, E., Leyens, J. -P., & Paladino, M. -P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 257-295). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
