The authors examine how allocentrism, or the importance placed on ingroups, relates to the perceived homogeneity and entitativity (groupness)of relational (interpersonal) and collective (categorical) ingroups. In two studies (Ns = 198, 90), allocentrism is shown to be positively related to perceptions of ingroup entitativity and homogeneity. This pattern was obtained, however, only for perceptions of collective ingroups. Ethnic differences between Hispanic and non-Hispanic White participants’ perceptions of ingroups were mediated by allocentrism (Study 1). Participants in Study 2 were members of a laboratory task group and their levels of allocentrism predicted their perceptions of the group’s homogeneity and entitativity regardless of the actual homogeneity of the group. The effects of allocentrism on perceptions of ingroups are discussed in terms of self-esteem, group identification, and responses to ingroup members’ deviations from norms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2.
Baumeister, R. F. , & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
3.
Betancourt, H. , & Lopez, S. R. (1993). The study of culture, ethnicity, and race in American psychology. American Psychologist, 48, 629-637.
4.
Bouchard, T. J. (1969). Personality, problem-solving procedure and performance in small groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 1-29.
5.
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475-482.
6.
Brewer, M. B. , & Gardner, W. (1996). Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 83-93.
7.
Brewer, M. B. , & Harasty, A. S. (1996). Seeing groups as entities: The role of perceiver motivation. In R. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: Vol. 3. The interpersonal context (pp. 347-370). New York: Guilford.
8.
Brown, R. J. , & Smith, A. (1989). Perceptions of and by minority groups: The case of women in academia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 61-75.
9.
Brown, R. J. , & Turner, J. C. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behaviour. In J. C. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 33-65). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
10.
Bugental, D. B. (1995, June). Do all social processes follow the same rules? An argument for domain-specificity. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New York.
11.
Burleson, B. R. , Levine, B. J., & Samter, W. (1985). Decision-making procedure and decision quality. Human Communication Research, 10, 557-574.
12.
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
13.
Caporael, L. R. (1995). Sociality: Coordinating bodies, minds and groups. Psycoloquy. Retrieved from http://apa.org/Psycoloquy/95.6.01.group-selection.1.caporael
14.
Caporael, L. R. , & Brewer, M. B. (1995). Hierarchical evolutionary theory: There is an alternative, and it’s not creationism. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 31-80.
15.
Carpenter, S. , & Radhakrishnan, P. (1999). Need for belonging: Perceptions of family, friends, ethnicity, and gender groups. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research, Santa Fe, NM.
16.
Castano, E. , & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (1998). The highs and lows of group homogeneity. Behavioural Processes, 42, 219-238.
17.
Doosje, B. , Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
18.
Hall, J. , & Watson, W. H. (1970). The effects of a normative intervention on group decision-making performance. Human Relations, 23, 299-317.
19.
Hamilton, D. L. , & Sherman, S. J. (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103, 336-355.
20.
Hamilton, D. L. , Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the entitativity continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
Haslam, S. A. , Oakes, P. J., Turner, J. C., & McGarty, C. (1996). Social identity, self-categorization, and the perceived homogeneity of ingroups and outgroups: The interaction between social motivation and cognition. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition, Vol. 3: The interpersonal context (pp. 182-222). New York: Guilford.
22.
Haythorn, W. (1953). The influence of individual members on the characteristics of small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 276-284.
23.
Hilton, J. L. , & von Hippel, W. (1990). The role of consistency in the judgment of stereotype-relevant behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 430-448.
24.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1980). A comparative analysis of communication pat terns within effective and ineffective decision-making groups. Communication Monographs, 47, 312-321.
25.
Hogg, M. A. , & Hardie, E. A. (1991). Social attraction, personal attraction, and self-categorization: A field study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 175-180.
26.
Innami, I. (1995). The quality of group decisions, group verbal behavior, and intervention. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 409-430.
27.
Jackson, J. , & Smith, E. R. (1999). Conceptualizing social identity: A new framework and evidence for the impact of different dimensions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 120-135.
28.
Karasawa, M. (1991). Toward an assessment of social identity: The structure of group identification and its effects on ingroup evaluations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 293-307.
29.
Kelly, C. (1989). Political identity and perceived intragroup homogeneity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 239-250.
30.
Kelly, C. , & Kelly, J. (1994). Who gets involved in collective action? Social psychological determinants of individual participation in trade unions. Human Relations, 47, 63-88.
31.
Lee, Y.-T. (1993). Ingroup preference and homogeneity among African American and Chinese American students. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 225-235.
32.
Lee, Y.-T. , & Ottati, V. (1995). Perceived ingroup homogeneity as a function of group membership salience and stereotype threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 610-619.
33.
Lickel, B. , Hamilton, D. L., Wieczorkowska, G., Lewis, A., Sherman, S. J., & Uhles, A. N. (2000). Varieties of groups and the perception of group entitativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 223-246.
34.
Linkey, H. E. , & Firestone, I. J. (1991). Dyad dominance composition effects, nonverbal behaviors, and influence. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 206-215.
35.
Linville, P. W. , Fischer, G., & Salovey, P. (1986). Perceived distributions of the characteristics of ingroup and outgroup members: Empirical evidence and a computer simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 165-188.
36.
McGarty, C. , Haslam, S. A., Hutchinson, K. J., & Grace, D. M. (1995). Determinants of perceived consistency: The relationship between group entitativity and the meaningfulness of categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 237-256.
37.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
38.
Mullen, B. , & Hu, L.-T. (1989). Perceptions of ingroup and outgroup variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
39.
Orpen, C. (1998). Using the stepladder technique to improve team performance. Psychological Studies, 42, 24-28.
40.
Ostrom, T. M. , & Sedikides, C. (1992). Outgroup homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536-552.
41.
Park, B. , & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
42.
Pickett, C. L. (2001). The effects of entitativity beliefs on implicit comparisons between group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 515-525.
43.
Prentice, D. A. , Miller, D. T., & Lightdale, J. R. (1994). Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 484-493.
44.
Radhakrishnan, P. , Kuhn, K. M., & Gelfand, M. J. (2000). The role of allocentrism on perceptions and reactions to goal discrepancy. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 24, 725-740.
45.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19-45.
46.
Simon, B. , & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711.
47.
Simon, B. , & Pettigrew, T. F. (1990). Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the ingroup homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 269-286.
48.
Singelis, T. M. , Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 29, 240-275.
49.
Smith, E. R. , Murphy, J., & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110.
50.
Triandis, H. C. (1989). Self and social behavior in differing social con texts. Psychological Review, 96, 506-520.
51.
Triandis, H. C. , Leung, K., Villareal, M., & Clark, F. (1985). Allocentric vs. idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 395-415.
52.
Triandis, H. C. , McCusker, C., & Hui, C. H. (1990). Multi-method probes of individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1006-1020.
53.
Wilder, D. A. (1986). Social categorization: Implications for creation and reduction of intergroup bias. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 291-355). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
54.
Wilder, D. A. , & Simon, A. F. (1998). Categorical and dynamic groups: Implications for social perception and intergroup behavior. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 27-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55.
Yzerbyt, V. , Castano, E., Leyens, J.-P., & Paladino, M.-P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of entitativity and identification. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 257-295). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
56.
Yzerbyt, V. Y. , & Rogier, A. (2000). Blame if on the group: Entitativity, subjective essentialism, and social attribution. In J. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
