People tend to approach agreeable propositions with a bias toward confirmation and disagreeable propositions with a bias toward disconfirmation. Because the appropriate strategy for solving the four-card Wason selection task is to seek disconfirmation, the authors predicted that people motivated to reject a task rule should be more likely to solve the task than those without such motivation. In two studies, participants who considered a Wason task rule that implied their own early death (Study 1) or the validity of a threatening stereotype (Study 2) vastly outperformed participants who considered nonthreatening or agreeable rules. Discussion focuses on how a skeptical mindset may help people avoid confirmation bias both in the context of the Wason task and in everyday reasoning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacon, F. (1955). Novum organum. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the Western world (Vol. 30, pp. 105-195). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica. (Original work published 1620)
2.
Cheng, P. W. , & Holyoak, K. (1985). Pragmatic reasoning schemas. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 391-416.
3.
Cheng, P. W. , & Holyoak, K. (1989). On the natural selection of reasoning theories. Cognition, 33, 285-313.
4.
Cosmides, L. (1989). The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection task. Cognition, 31, 187-276.
5.
Cosmides, L. , & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
Cox, J. R. , & Griggs, R. A. (1982). The effects of experience on performance in Wason’s selection task. Memory & Cognition, 105, 496-502.
7.
Dawson, E. , Gilovich, T., & Regan, D. T. (2002). Motivated reasoning and susceptibility to the “Cell A” bias. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8.
Ditto, P. H. , & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
9.
Ditto, P. H. , Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G. D., Apanovich, A. M., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 53-69.
10.
Doosje, B. , Spears, R., & Koomen, W. (1995). When bad isn’t all bad: Strategic use of sample information in generalization and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 642-655.
11.
Dunning, D. , Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989). Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1082-1090.
12.
Evans, J. St. B. T. (1982). The psychology of deductive reasoning. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
13.
Fiedler, K. , & Hertel, G. (1994). Content-related schemata versus verbal-framing effects in deductive reasoning. Social Cognition, 12, 129-147.
14.
George, C. (1991). Facilitation in the Wason selection task with a consequent referring to an unsatisfactory outcome. British Journal of Psychology, 82, 463-472.
15.
Gigerenzer, G. , & Hug, K. (1992). Reasoning about social contracts: Cheating and perspective change. Cognition, 43, 127-171.
16.
Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.
17.
Gilovich, T. , Dawson, E., & Regan, D. T. (2002). Motivated skepticism, motivated credulity: The “Can I? Must I?” distinction in preference-driven reasoning. Manuscript in preparation.
18.
Greenberg, J. , Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Pinel, E., Jordan, K., & Simon, L. (1993). The effects of self-esteem on vulnerability-denying defensive distortions: Further evidence that self-esteem serves an anxiety-buffering function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 229-251.
19.
Griggs, R. A. (1984). Memory cueing and instructional effects on Wason’s selection task. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 10, 10-10.
20.
Griggs, R. A. , & Cox, J. R. (1982). The elusive thematic-materials effect in Wason’s selection task. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 407-420.
21.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. , Legrenzi, P., & Legrenzi, M. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 395-400.
22.
Klayman, J. , & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
23.
Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636-647.
24.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 636-647.
25.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91-105). London: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Lord, C. G. , Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
27.
Mankeltow, K. I. , & Evans, J. St. B. T. (1979). Facilitation of reasoning by realism: Effect or non-effect?British Journal of Psychology, 70, 477-488.
28.
Mynatt, C. R. , Doherty, M. E., & Tweney, R. D. (1977). Confirmation bias in a simulated research environment: An experimental study of scientific inference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 85-95.
29.
Pollard, P. , & Evans, J. St. B. T. (1981). The effects of prior beliefs in reasoning: An associational interpretation. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 73-81.
30.
Pollard, P. , & Evans, J. St. B. T. (1983). The effect of experimentally contrived experience on reasoning performance. Psychological Research, 45, 287-301.
31.
Pronin, E. , Ross, L., & Gilovich, T. (2002). The bias blindspot: Detecting bias in others, but not the self. Manuscript in progress.
32.
Pyszczynski, T. , & Greenberg, J. (1987). Toward an integration of cognitive and motivational perspectives on social inference: A biased hypothesis-testing model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 297-340). New York: Academic Press.
33.
Sagan, C. (1996). The demon haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. New York: Random House.
34.
Schaller, M. (1991). Social categorization and the formation of group stereotypes: Further evidence for biased information processing in the perception of group-behavior correlations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 25-35.
35.
Schaller, M. (1992). In-group favoritism and statistical reasoning in social inference: Implications for formation and maintenance of group stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 61-74.
36.
Schick, T. , & Vaughn, L. (1999). How to think about weird things: Critical thinking for a new age. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
37.
Shermer, M. (1997). Why people believe weird things: Pseudoscience, superstition, and other confusions of our time. New York: Freeman.
38.
Snyder, M. , & Swann, W. B. (1978). Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1202-1212.
39.
Stanovich, K. E. (2001). How to think straight about psychology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
40.
Valentine, E. R. (1985). The effect of instructions on performance in the Wason selection task. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 4, 214-223.
41.
Wason, P. C. (1966). Reasoning. In B. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology. London: Penguin.
42.
Wason, P. C. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 271-281.
43.
Wason, P. C. , & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1972). Psychology of reasoning: Structure and content. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Wason, P. C. , & Shapiro, D. (1972). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23, 63-71.
45.
Wrightsman, L. S. , Nietzel, T., & Fortune, W. H. (1998). Psychology and the legal system. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
46.
Yachanin, S. A. (1986). Facilitation in Wason’s selection task: Content and instructions. Current Psychological Research and Reviews, 5, 20-29.
47.
Yachanin, S. A. , & Tweney, R. D. (1982). The effect of semantic content in cognition strategies in the four card selection task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 19, 87-90.
