The authors compared an affordance operationalization to two traditional operationalizations of traits. Following Beauvois and Dubois (2000), it is argued that traits involve a consistency in both the target behaviors (TBs) and others’ behaviors toward the target (OBs). Conceptually, TBs represent descriptive knowledge (what the target tends to do) and OBs represent functional knowledge (what the target tends to afford). To compare the operationalizations, 49 participants were asked to judge videotapes of 12 targets using one of three rating modes: (a) global trait labels, (b) TBs, or (3) OBs. Results showed that (a) targets were more differentiated with OBs than with TBs or trait labels and (b) trait scales were more homogeneous with OBs than with TBs or trait labels. Consequences of a Gibsonian approach to person perception are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
2.
Bassili, J. N. (Ed.). (1989). Traits as action categories versus traits as person attributes in social cognition. In On line cognition in person perception (pp. 61-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3.
Beauvois, J. L. (1990). L’acceptabilité sociale et la connaissance évaluative [Social acceptability and evaluative knowledge]. Connexions, 56, 7-16.
4.
Beauvois, J. L. (1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales [The knowledge of social utility]. Psychologie française40, 375-388
5.
Beauvois, J. L. , & Dubois, N. (1992). Traits as evaluative categories. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 253-270.
6.
Beauvois, J. L. , & Dubois, N. (2000). Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59, 16-33.
7.
Beauvois, J. L. , Dubois, N., & Peeters, G. (1999). L’évaluation personnologique [Person evaluation]. In J. L. Beauvois, N. Dubois, & W. Doise (Eds.), La construction sociale de la personne [The social construction of the person]. Grenoble, France: PUG.
8.
Berry, D. S. (1990). Taking people at face value: Evidence for kernel of truth hypothesis. Social Cognition, 8, 343-361.
9.
Borkenau, P. , & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657.
10.
Borkenau, P. , & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553.
11.
Borkenau, P. , & Liebler, A. (1995). Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality, 63, 1-25.
12.
Cambon, L. (in press). La désirabilité et l’utilitésocial des professions et des professionnels [Desirability and social utility of occupations and professionals]. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule, & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales [Cognitive views and social behaviors] (IX). Rennes, France: Rennes University Press
13.
Dubois, N. , & Tarquinio, C. (1998). Le traitement de l’information évaluative par des professionnels de l’évaluation sociale [Evaluative information processing by professional of social evaluation]. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 11, 99-122.
14.
Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
15.
Funder, D. C. (1995). On accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
16.
Funder, D. C. , & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
17.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
18.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
19.
John, O. P. (1990). The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
20.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: the Guilford Press
21.
Kenny, D. A. , Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 245-258.
22.
Kenny, D. A. , Horner, C., Kashy, D. A., & Chu, L. (1992). Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 88-97.
23.
Kenny, D. A. , & La Voie, L. (1984). The Social Relations Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 141-181.
24.
Kiesler, D. J. , & Schmidt, J. A. (1993). The impact message inventory: Form IIA octant scale version. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.
25.
Lamiell, J. T. (2000). A periodic table of personality elements? The “Big Five” and Trait “psychology” in critical perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 20, 1-24.
26.
Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York: Ronald Press.
27.
Le Poultier, F. , & Guéguen, N. (1991). De l’utilité sociale des traits et des théories implicites de la personnalité [On the social utility of traits and implicit personality theories]. Psychologie Française, 36, 25-34.
28.
Leyens, J.-Ph. (1998). Solomon Asch, what did you do to social psychology?Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 11, 13-17.
29.
Marcus, D. K. , & Leatherwood, J. C. (1998). The interpersonal circle at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 297-313.
30.
McArthur, L. Z. , & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
31.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
32.
McCrae, R. R. , & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 56, 586-595.
33.
Mollaret, P. (1998). Redéfinir les traits [Redefining traits]. L’Année Psychologique, 98, 545-567.
34.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
35.
Norman, W. T. , & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 681-691.
36.
Paulhus, D. L. , & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.
37.
Paulhus, D. L. , & Reynolds, S. (1995). Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: Highlighting the person in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1233-1242.
38.
Paunonen, S. V. (1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823-833.
39.
Peabody, D. (1967). Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 7,(4, Serial No. 644).
40.
Reeder, G. D. , & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 86, 61-79.
41.
Watson, D. (1989). Strangers’ ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120-128.
42.
Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
43.
Zebrowitz, L. A. , & Collins, M. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204-223.
