Jesus was accused of being possessed by Beelzebul because of the exorcisms he practiced. This kind of view is characteristic of the first-century Mediterranean interpretation of deviant behavior. The purpose of this article is to determine the historical causes of this accusation and the purpose of the reaction of Jesus against it. To accomplish this we apply to the Beelzebul controversy some models developed in the study of deviant behavior. The first step is a source- and tradition-critical study of the sayings contained in it to determine which ot them can be assigned to the historical Jesus. Then the accusation of being possessed by Beelzebul is considered in the framework of societal reactions to deviant behavior. Finally, the responses of Jesus are placed in the scenario of the Mediterranean challenge and riposte game and in the context of other possible reactions to negative labeling.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Becker, H.S.1964. OUTSIDERS: STUDIES IN THE SOCIOLOGY OF DEVIANCE. London, UKFree Press of Glenroe .
Boring, M.E.1992. The Synoptic Problem. "Minor" Agreements and the Beelzebul Pericope. Pp. 587-619 in THE FOUR GOSPELS, edited by F. van Segbroeck et al. Leuven, Belgium: F.S.F. Neirynck.
4.
Bultmann, R.1963. THE HISTORY OF THE SYNOPTIC TRADITION. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
5.
Coser, L.A.1962. Some Functions of Deviant Behaviour and Normative Flexibility , AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY68: 172-81.
6.
Crossan, J.D.1991. THE HISTORICAL JESUS. San Francisco, CA: Harper.
7.
1983 . IN FRAGMENTS. San Francisco: Harper.
8.
Davies, S.1995. JESUS THE HEALER. POSSESSION, TRANCE AND ORIGINS OF CHRISTIANITY . New York, NY: Continuum Books .
9.
Ebertz, M.N.1992Le stigmate du mouvement charismatique autour de Jésus de Nazareth, SOCIAL COMPASS39: 255-73.
10.
1987 . DAS CHARISMA DES GEKREUZIGTEN. ZUR SOCIOLOGIE DER JESUBEWEGUNG . Tübingen, Germany.
11.
Eitrem, S.1966. SOME NOTES ON THE DEMONOLOGY IN THE NT . Oslo, Norway.
12.
Erikson, K.T.1962. Notes on the Sociology of Deviance, SOCIAL PROBLEMS9: 30-14.
13.
Fuchs, A.1980. DIE ENTWIKLUNG DER BEELZEBULKONTROVERSE BEI DEN SYNOPTIKERN. Linz.
14.
Fuente, A. de la.1995. A favor o en contra de Jesœs. El logion de Mc9,40 y sus paralelos, ESTUDIOS BÍBLICOS 53: 449-59.
15.
Garfinkel, H.1956. Conditions of Successful Degradation Ceremonies , AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY61: 420-24.
16.
Guijarro, S.1998. FIDELIDADES EN CONFLICTO. LA RUPTURA CON LA FAMILIA POR CAUSA DEL DISCIPULADO Y DE LA MISIÓN EN LA TRADICIÓN SINOPTICA. Salamanca, Spain: Universidad Pontificia .
17.
1997. The Family in First Century Galilee. Pp. 42-65 in CONSTRUCTING EARLY CHRISTIAN FAMILIES, edited by H. Moxnes.London, UK: Routledge.
18.
Hollenbach, P.W.1981. Jesus, Demoniacs, and Public Authorities: A Socio-Historical Study, THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION49: 561-88.
19.
Humphries, M.1993. The Kingdom of God in the Q Version of the Beelzebul Controversy , FORUM9: 121-50.
20.
Katz, J.1972. Deviance, Charisma and Rule-Defined Behaviour, SOCIAL PROBLEMS20: 186-202.
21.
Kitsuse, J. 1. 1962. Societal Reaction to Deviant Behaviour: Problems of Theory and Method, SOCIAL PROBLEMS9: 247-56.
22.
Kolenkow, A.B.1976. A Problem of Power: How Miracle Doers Counter Charges of Magic in the Hellenistic World. Pp. 105-10 in SBL 1976 SEMINAR PAPERS, edited by G. MacRae.Missoula, MT: Scholars Press.
23.
Kollmann, B.1996. JESUS UND DIE CHRISTEN ALS WUNDERTSTER. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck Ruprecht .
24.
Lemert, E.M.1967. HUMAN DEVIANCE. SOCIAL PROBLEMS AND SOCIAL CONTROL . Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
Lipp, W.1977. Charisma - Social Deviation, Leadership and Cultural Change , THE ANNUAL REVIEW OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES OF RELIGION1: 59-77.
26.
Malina, B.J. & J.J. Neyrey.1991a. Conflict in Luke-Acts. Labelling and Deviance Theory. Pp. 97-122 in THE SOCIAL WORLD OF LUKE-ACTS. MODELS FOR INTERPRETATION, edited by J. Neyrey.Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.
27.
1991b. Honor and Shame: Pivotal Values of the Mediterranean World. Pp. 25-65 in THE SOCIAL WORLD, edited by J. Neyrey.
28.
1991c. First-Century Personality: Dyadic not Individual. Pp. 67-96 in THE SOCIAL WORLD, edited by J. Neyrey.
29.
1988 . Calling Jesus Names. THE SOCIAL VALUE OF LABELS IN MATTHEW . Sonoma, CA: Polebridge.
30.
Mankoff, M.1971. Societal Reaction and Career Deviance. A Critical Analysis , SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY12: 204-18.
31.
Meier, J.1994. A MARGINAL JEW. Volume Two: MENTOR, MESSAGE, AND MIRACLES . New York, NY: Doubleday .
32.
Mödritzer, H.1994. STIGMA UND CHARISMA IM NT UND SEINER UMWELT. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht .
33.
Oakman, D.E. . 1988. Rulers' Houses, Thieves, and Usurpers. The Beelzebul Pericope, FORUM4: 109-23.
34.
Pfohl, S.J.1985. IMAGES OF DEVIANCE AND SOCIAL CONTROL. A SOCIOLOGICAL HISTORY. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill .
35.
Richter, P.1995. Social-Scientific Criticism of the New Testament: An Appraisal and Extended Example. Pp. 266-309. in APPROACHES TO NEW TESTAMENT STUDY , edited by E. Porter.Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
36.
Rogers, J.W. - Buffalo, M.D.1974. Fighting Back: Nine Modes of Adaptation to a Deviant Label , SOCIAL PROBLEMS22: 101-18.
37.
Rousseau, J.J.1993. Jesus, an Exorcist of a Kind Pp. 129-53 in SBL 1993 SEMINAR PAPERS, edited by E. Lovering.Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
38.
Sanders, J.T.1993. SCHISMATICS, SECTARIANS, DISSIDENTS, DEVIANTS. THE FIRST. HUNDRED YEARS OF JEWISH-CHRISTIAN RELATIONS. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press.
39.
Schürmann, H.1992. QLuke 11,14-36 kompositionsgeschichtlich gefragt . Pp. 563-86 in THE FOUR GOSPELS, edited by F. van Segbroeck et al. Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
40.
Sellew, P.1988. Beelzebul in Mark 3. Dialogue Story or Sayings Cluster ? FORUM4: 93-108.
41.
Shirock, R.1992. Whose Exorcists are They?. The References to oiJ uiJoi; uJmw'n at Matthew12,27 / Luke 11, 19, JOURNAL FOR THE STUDY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT46: 41-51.
42.
Theissen, G.1995. Jünger als Gewalttäter (Matt 11, 12f.; Luke 16,16) Der Stürmerspruch als Selbstigmatisierung einer Minorität. Pp. 183-200.in: MIGHTY MINORITIES, edited by D. Hellholm, H. Moxnes, T. K. Seim , and F. S J. Jervell. Oslo, Norway/Copengagen, Denmark/ Stockholm, Sweden/ Boston, MA:
43.
1989. Jesusbewegung als charismatische Wertrevolution, NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES35: 343-60.
44.
Theissen, G. & A. Mertz.1996. DER HISTORISCHE JESUS. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
45.
Thio, A.1998. DEVIANT BEHAVIOR. New York: Longman.
46.
Trunk, D.1994. DER MESIANISCHE HEILER. EINE REDAKTION UND RELIGIONSGESCHICHLICHE STUDIE ZU DEN EXORZISMEN IM MATTHÄUSEVANGELIUM. Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: Herder.
47.
Twelftree, G.H.1993. JESUS, THE EXORCIST. A CONTRIBUTION TO THE STUDY OF THE HISTORICAL JESUS. Peabody, MA.: Hendrickson Publishers.
48.
Warren, C.A.B.1980. Destigmatization of Identity: From Deviant to Charismatic , QUALITATIVE SOCIOLOGY3: 59-72.
49.
Yates, R.1977. Jesus and the Demonic in the Synoptic Gospels. IRISH THEOLOGICAL QUARTERLY44: 39-57.
