Since the end of the 18th century, scholars have recognized that 2 Corinthians is a composite letter. Nevertheless, there is still no consensus on the proper division of the document. Chapters 1-7 of the letter present the most difficulty. In Part 1 of this study I suggest a scenario which could account for the present shape of these chapters. I also acknowledge, however, the fact that my production of this scenario creates a "Catch-22" type dilemma, for any scenario that justifies a redactor putting several letters together in a particular way can also be viewed as a rationale for Paul giving 2 Corinthians 1-7 its present shape. Consequently, in Part 2 of this study I suggest an approach which focuses on the text of these chapters as they stand regardless of who is responsible for their arrangement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Apuleius1915The Golden Ass. Loeb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
Aristophanes1924Aristophanes 2. Loeb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
Athenaeus1928The Deipnosophists 2. Loeb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
4.
Barrett, C.K.1973The Second Epistle to the Corinthians. HNTC. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Beardslee, William A.1970Literary Criticism of the New Testament. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
6.
Betz, Hans Dieter1973 "2 Cor 6:14-7:1: An Anti-Pauline Fragment?" Journal of Biblical Literature92: 88-108.
7.
19852 Corinthians 8 and 9. Hermeneia. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
8.
Booth, Wayne C.1983The Rhetoric of Fiction. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
9.
Bornkamm, Gunther1962 "The History of the Origin of the So-Called Second Letter to the Corinthians," New Testament Studies8: 256-64.
10.
1971 "Die Vorgeschichte des sogennanten Zweiten Korintherbriefs ," Geschichte und Glaube. Munich, Germany: Kaiser.
11.
Bruce, F.F.19711 and 2 Corinthians. New Century Bible. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
12.
Bultmann, Rudolf1985The Second Letter to the Corinthians. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Press.
13.
Chatman, Seymour1978Story and Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14.
Collange, J.-F.1972Énigmes de la deuxième éPître de Paul aux Corinthiens. SNTSMS 18. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
Culpepper, R. Alan1983Anatomy of the Fourth Gospel. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
16.
Dahl, Nils Alstrup1977Studies in Paul. Minneapolis, MN: Augsburg Press.
17.
Dellung, Gerhard1965 "Thriambeuo," TDNT3: 159-60.
18.
Doty, William G.1973Letters in Primitive Christianity. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
19.
Duff, Paul Brooks1991a "Metaphor, Motif, and Meaning," Catholic Biblical Quarterly53: 79-92.
20.
1991b "Apostolic Suffering and the Language of Processions in 2 Corinthians 4:7-10" Biblical Theology Bulletin21: 158-65.
21.
1993 "The Mind of the Redactor," Novum Testamentum35: 160-80.
22.
Egan, Kieran1978 "What Is a Plot?" New Literary History9: 455-73.
23.
Euripides1912Euripides 2. Loeb. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24.
Fee, Gordon1976 "II Corinthians VI.14-VII.1 and Food Offered to Idols," New Testament Studies23: 142.
25.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A.1971 "Qumran and the Interpolated Paragraph in 2 Cor 6;17-7:1 ," in J. A. Fitzmyer, ed., Essays on the Semitic Background of the New Testament: 205-17 .
26.
Furnish, Victor Paul1984II Corinthians. Anchor Bible, 32A. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
27.
Georgi, Dieter1976 "Second Letter to the Corinthians," Interpreters' Dictionary of the Bible (Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press), Supplemental Volume: 183-86.
28.
1986The Opponents of Paul in Second Corinthians. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
29.
Gnilka, Joachim1968 "2 Cor 6:14-7:1 in Light of the Qumran Texts and the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs," in J. Murphy-O'Connor , ed., Paul and Qumran ( Chicago : Priory): 48-68.
30.
Hafemann, Scott J.1986Suffering and the Spirit. Tübingen : Mohr (Seibeck).
31.
Halmel, Anton1894Der Vierkapitelbrief im zweiten Korintherbrief des Apostels Paulus. Essen, Germany: Baedeker .
32.
Hausrath, Adolf1870Der Vier-Capitel-Brief des Paulus an die Korinther. Heidelberg , Germany: Bassermann.
33.
Hyldahl, Nils1973 "Die Frage nach der literarischen Einheit des Zweiten Korintherbriefs ," ZNW64: 289-306.
34.
Koester, Helmut1982Introduction to the New Testament 2. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
35.
Kummel, Wemer Georg, et al. 1975Introduction to the New Testament. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
36.
Marshall, Peter1983 "A Metaphor of Social Shame," Novum Testamentum25: 302-17.
37.
Martin, Ralph P.19862 Corinthians. Word. Waco, TX : Word.
38.
Marxen, Willi1968Introduction to the New Testament. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
39.
Morgan, Robert, and John Barton1988Biblical Interpretation. Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
