In Luke-Acts the social codes and concepts associated with food and meals replicate and support the contrasting social codes, interests, and ideologies associated with the Jerusalem Temple, on the one hand, and the Christian household, on the other. In this study the thesis is advanced that in contrast to the Temple and the exclusivist purity and legal system it represents, Luke has used occasions of domestic dining and hospitality to depict an inclusive form of social relations which transcends previous Jewish purity regulations and which gives concrete social expression to the inclusive character of the gospel, the kingdom of God, and the Christian community.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Belo, Fernando.1981A Materialist Reading of the Gospel of Mark. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis.
2.
Borg, Marcus J.1984Conflict, Holiness and Politics in the Teachings of Jesus . Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen .
3.
Douglas, Mary.1966Purity and Danger. An Analysis of Concepts of Purity and Taboo. New York: Frederick A. Praeger .
4.
1975 "Deciphering a Meal," in Mary Douglas, Implicit Meanings. Essays in Anthropology. Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 249-75.
5.
Douglas, Mary, ed. 1984Food in the Social Order. Studies of Food and Festivities in Three American Communities . New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation .
6.
Elliott, John H.1991 "Temple Versus Household in Luke-Acts: A Contrast in Social Institutions," in Jerome H. Neyrey , ed., The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation . Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers , pp. 211-40. Published also in Hervormde Theologiese Studies47/1.
7.
Esler, Philip Francis1987Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts. The social and political motivations of Lucan theology. SNTS Monograph Series, 57. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press .
8.
Feeley-Harnik, Gillian.1981The Lord's Table. Eucharist and Passover in Early Christianity . Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
9.
Harris, Marvin.1985Good to Eat. Riddles of Food and Culture. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
10.
Karris, Robert J.1985Luke: Artist and Theologian. New York, NY: Paulist Press.
11.
Koenig, John1985New Testament Hospitality. Partnership with Strangers as Promise and Mission. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress.
12.
Krodel, Gerhard1981Acts. Proclamation Commentaries. Philadelphia , PA: Fortress Press.
13.
Leach, Edmund1969Genesis as Myth and Other Essays. London , UK: Jonathan Cape.
14.
Malina, Bruce J.1981New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology . Atlanta, GA: John Knox Press .
15.
Moxnes, Halvor1986-87 "Meals and the new community in Luke," Svensk Exegetisk Arsbok51-52: 158-67.
16.
Neusner, Jacob1973The Idea of Purity in Ancient Judaism. Leiden, The Netherlands: E. J. Brill.
17.
Newton, Michael1985The concept of purity at Qumran and in the letters of Paul. SNTSMS 53. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Neyrey, Jerome H.1986 "The Idea of Purity in Mark's Gospel," in John H. Elliott, ed., Social-Scientific Criticism of the New Testament and Its Social World. Semeia 35. Decatur, Ga: Scholars Press, pp. 91-128.
19.
1991 "Ceremonies in Luke-Acts: The Case of Meals and Table-fellowship ," in Jerome H. Neyrey, ed., The Social World of Luke-Acts: Models for Interpretation. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, pp. 361-87.
20.
Powers, William K., and Marla M. N. Powers1984 "Metaphysical Aspects of an Oglala Food System," in Mary Douglas , ed., Food in the Social Order. Studies of Food and Festivities in Three American Communities. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 40-96.
21.
Soler, Jean1979 "The Dietary Prohibitions of the Hebrews," New York Review of Books (June 14), pp. 24-30. Reprinted as in Robert Forster and Orest Ranum, eds., Food and Drink in History. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 126-138.
