The collective memory theory of Maurice Halbwachs shows that the memory traditions of Jesus recorded in the Second Testament have a function beyond the mere provision of factual information about the historical figure. From this perspective, the memory of Jesus is understood to be constitutive of Christian community and to be normative for the collective self-definition. This essay explores this theory by way of an analysis of 1 Thessalonians.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berger, Peter L. and Luckmann, Thomas1966The Social Construction of Reality.New York: Doubleday and Co., Inc.
2.
Best, Ernest.1972A Commentary on the First and Second Epistles to the Thessalonians.New York: Harper and Row.
3.
Collins, Raymond F.1984Studies on the First Letter to the Thessalonians.Leuven: Leuven University Press.
4.
Halbwachs, Maurice1975Les Cadres sociaux de la mémoire.New York: Arno Press.
5.
1980The Collective Memory.New York: Harper and Row.
6.
Lonergan, Bernard J. F.1972Method in Theology.New York: Herder and Herder.
7.
Marshall, I. Howard1983The New Century Bible Commentary: 1 and 2 Thessalonians.Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publ. Co.
8.
Meeks, Wayne A.1983The First Urban Christians.New Haven: Yale University Press.
9.
Mol, Hans J.1977Identity and the Sacred.New York: Free Press.
