Genesis 16:12 contains three clauses that have been widely interpreted as predicting prolonged conflict between Ishmael’s descendants and their relatives within the Abrahamic family. While there is agreement among contemporary commentators that the wording of these clauses is ambiguous, negative renderings are far more prevalent than positive or neutral renderings in popular English translations, as well as in expositions of the text. This article argues that Hagar’s response to her own promise, in concert with other elements in the wider narrative of Genesis, should be prioritized in deciding between negative or positive interpretations of the ambiguous wording therein. It also reexamines the level of ambiguity of the wording itself to show that it may not be as obscure as has often been proposed.
AngelHayyim. 2013. Sarah’s Treatment of Hagar (Genesis 16): Morals, Messages, and Mesopotamia. Jewish Bible Quarterly41(4), 215-35.
2.
ChaseEmily (1999). Promises, Blessings, & Curses: Hagar and the Wild Ass. The Bible Translator50(2), 214-19.
3.
CliffordRichard J.1993. Genesis. In ChiuJosé Enrique Aguilar, et. Al. (Eds.), The Paulist Biblical Commentary (pp. 3-56). Mahweh, New Jersey: Paulist.
4.
DozemanThomas B.1998. The Wilderness and Salvation History in the Hagar Story. Journal of Biblical Literature117(1), 23-43.
5.
FretheimTerence E.1994. Genesis. In General | Old Testament Articles, Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus. In KeckLe-ander (Ed.), The New Interpreter’s Bible: A Commentary in Twelve Volumes in The New Interpreter’s Bible (Vol. 1). Nashville, Tennessee: Abingdon.
6.
Frymer-KenskyTikva. 2002. Reading the Women of the Bible: A New Interpretation of Their Stories. New York, New York: Shocken.
7.
JuddAndrew. 2021. Hagar, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and why we cannot agree on what the Bible says about slavery. Bulletin for Biblical Research (31)1, 1-15.
8.
HartleyJohn E.2012. Genesis. In Understanding the Bible Commentary (Vol. 1). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Baker.
9.
HawkDaniel L.2011. Cast Out and Cast Off: Hagar, Leah, and the God Who Sees. Priscilla Papers25(1). 9-13.
10.
ChristopherHeard R.2014. On the Road to Paran: Toward a Christian Perspective on Hagar and Ishmael. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology68(3). 270-85.
11.
ChristopherHeard R.2001. Dynamics of Diselection: Ambiguity and Ethnic Boundaries in Post-Exilic Judah. Atlanta, Georgia: The Society of Biblical Literature.
12.
HuffmanMichael. 2023. Palestinian Arabs as co-heirs of the Abrahamic promise: revisiting a literal, unconditional interpretation. The Kenarchy Journal5, 101-21.
13.
JarrellR. H.2002. The Birth Narrative as Female Counterpart to Covenant. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament97, 3-18.
14.
JeremiahDavid. “The Arab-Israeli Conflict.” The Jeremiah Study Bible, http://www.jeremiahstudybible.com/Genesis/arab-israeli-conflict/. Accessed 26 September, 2023.
15.
KatanachoYohanna. 2010. Hagar: A Victim of Injustice. International Congregational Journal, 9(2), 78-82.
16.
KrayerPatrick. 2022. God’s Promise to Hagar in Genesis 16: Rethinking a Problematic Text. The Bible Translator73(1). 73-88.
17.
LongmanTremperIII. 2016. Genesis. In LongmanTremperIII (Ed.), The Story of God Bible Commentary (Vol. 1). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Academic.
18.
LucasPhilippa (2023). Relating Genesis 16 to sexual abuse in the church: Hagar as a biblical parallel. Anglican Theological Review105(1), 87-96.
19.
McKeownJames. 2008. Genesis. In Two Horizons Old Testament Commentary (Vol. 1). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans.
20.
NikaidoS.2001. Hagar and Ishmael as Literary Figures. Vetus Testamentum51(2), 219-42.
21.
OkoyeJames C.Sarah and Hagar: Genesis 16 and 21. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament32(2), 163-75.
22.
RenoR. R.2010. Genesis. In Brazos Theological Commentary on the Bible (Vol. 1). Ada, Michigan: Brazos.
23.
SailhammerJohn H.2008. Genesis. In Genesis-Leviticus. In LongmanTremperIIIGarlandDavid E. (Eds.), The New Expositor’s Bible Commentary (Vol. 1, pp. 21-332). Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Academic.
24.
SarnaNahum M.2001. Genesis. In The JPS Torah Commentary (Vol. 1). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Jewish Publication Society.
TamezElsa. 1986. The Woman Who Complicated the History of Salvation. Cross Currents36(2), 129-39.
27.
WaltkeBruce K.2001. Genesis: A Commentary. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Academic.
28.
WaltonJohn H.MatthewsVictor H.1997. Genesis-Deuteronomy. In The IVP Bible Background Commentary. Westmont, Illinois: InterVarsity.
29.
WeemsRenita J. (1991). Reading Her Way through the Struggle: African American Women and the Bible. In FelderCain Hope (Ed.), The Stony Road We Trod: African American Biblical Interpretation. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Fortress, p. 57-77).
30.
WenhamGordon J.2000. Genesis 16-50. In HubbardDavid Allen, et. al. (Eds.), Word Biblical Commentary (Vol. 2). Nashville, Tennessee: Thomas Nelson.
