This paper deploys Jeffery M. Paige’s sociological theory of agrarian revolution to understand the collective violence of the parable of the tenants (Mark 12:1–12, Gos. Thom. 65). I begin with the idea that the parable involves a sharecrop-ping relation. I then use Paige’s theory to highlight that sharecropping systems in agricultural export sectors are not only correlated with revolutionary violence in Paige’s work (with statistical significance), but are part of the parable’s realistic fiction. I argue that the economic infrastructure of early Roman Palestine, including Galilee, and the violence in the parable are well explained by Paige’s theory. I also employ V. N. Voloshinov’s sociolinguistic theory of language-ideology to derive the central thesis of this paper: as a semiotic medium of social life, the parable functions as part of the ideological process that creates a fiction of a world in which agrarian revolution is realistic and acceptable.
Applebaum, S. (1988). Josephus and the Economic Causes of the Jewish War. In Josephus, the Bible, and History (pp. 237–264). Wayne State University Press.
2.
Bazzana, G. B. (2015). Kingdom of Bureaucracy: The Political Theology of Village Scribes in the Sayings Gospel Q. Leuven: Peeters.
3.
Collins, A. Y. (2007). Mark: A Commentary. Fortress Press.
4.
Crossan, J. D. (1992). In Parables: The Challenge of the Historical Jesus. Polebridge Press.
5.
Das, S. (2008). Ideology and Organisations of Rural Protest: Tebhaga Peasant Movement in Bengal (1946-49). Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, 69, 674–690.
6.
Fiensy, D. A. (1991). The Social History of Palestine in the Herodian Period: The Land is Mine. E. Mellen Press.
7.
Fominaya, C. F. (2007). The Role of Humour in the Process of Collective Identity Formation in Autonomous Social Movement Groups in Contemporary Madrid. International Review of Social History, 52, 243–258.
8.
Foxhall, L. (1990). The Dependent Tenant: Land Leasing and Labour in Italy and Greece. The Journal of Roman Studies, 80, 97–114.
9.
Francisco, R. A. (1993). Theories of Protest and the Revolutions of 1989. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 663–680. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111569
10.
Freyne, S. (1980). Galilee: From Alexander the Great to Hadrian 323 B.C.E to 135 B.E, a study of second temple Judaism. University of Notre Dame Press.
11.
Garrabou, R., Planas, J., & Saguer, E. (2001). Sharecrop-ping and the Management of Large Rural Estates in Catalonia, 1850-1950. Journal of Peasant Studies, 28, 89–108.
12.
Gimenez, C. H. de. (1990). Asi Cantaban la Revolucion. Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes : Grijalbo.
13.
Herzog, W. R. (1994). Parables as Subversive Speech: Jesus as Pedagogue of the Oppressed. Westminster/John Knox Press.
14.
Herzog, W. R. (2005). Prophet and Teacher: An Introduction to the Historical Jesus. Westminster John Knox Press.
15.
Kappeler, F. (2018). The Chronotope of Revolution. ‘Volcanic’ Narrations of the Haitian Revolution. Karib – Nordic Journal for Caribbean Studies, 4(1), 6. DOI: http://doi.org/10.16993/karib.46
16.
Kloppenborg, J. S. (2008). The Growth and Impact of Agricultural Tenancy in Jewish Palestine (III BCE-I CE). Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 51(1), 31–66.
17.
Kloppenborg, J. S. (2006). The Tenants in the Vineyard: Ideology, Economics, and Agrarian Conflict in Jewish Palestine. Mohr Siebeck.
18.
Kreissig, H. (1970). Die sozialen Zusammenhange des judaischen Krieges: Klassen und Klassenkampf im Palastina des 1. Jahrhunderts v. U. Z. Akademie-Verlag.
19.
Martinez-Alier, J. (1983). Sharecropping: Some illustrations. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 10(2–3), 94–106.
20.
Marx, K. (1979). The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Karl Marx, Frederick Engels: Collected Works (Vol. 11). Lawrence & Wishart.
21.
Mary AnnBeavis. (2001). The Power of Jesus’ Parables: Were They Polemical or Irenic?Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 23(82), 3–29.
22.
Oakman, D. E. (1986). Jesus and the Economic Questions of His Day. The Edwin Mellen Press.
23.
Paige, J. M. (1978). Agrarian Revolution: Social Movements and Export Agriculture in the Underdeveloped World. Free Press; Collier Macmillan.
24.
Paige, J. M. (1996). Land Reform and Agrarian Revolution in El Salvador: Comment on Seligson and Diskin. Latin American Research Review, 31(2), 127–139.
25.
Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the Folktale. University of Texas Press.
26.
Sarris, P. (2013). Integration and Disintegration in the Late Roman Economy: The Role of Markets, Emperors, and Aristocrats. Late Antique Archaeology, 10(1), 167–188.
27.
Scott, J. C. (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
28.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press.
29.
van Eck, E. (2012). Jesus and violence: An ideological-critical reading of the Tenants in Mark 12:1-12 and Thomas 65 (Vol. 16, pp. 101–132).
30.
Voloshinov, V. (1986). Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Harvard University Press.
31.
Zagoria, D. S. (1971). The Ecology of Peasant Communism in India. American Political Science Review, 65(1), 144–160.
