The relationship between Dionysiac and emerging Christian traditions has long exercised biblical and classical scholars. Dionysianism is complex because of both its constituent mythologies and the fluidity and variety of its rituals. Emerging Christianity similarly defies a single metanarrative. This essay notes the difficulties of comparing Dionysiac tradition with just one early Christian text: the Gospel of John. The variety of Dionysiac material, the particular issues raised by critical readings of the Gospel (content and composition), the difficulty of overarching theological terminology (like “sacramentalism”), intertextuality, and mimesis criticism are all problematic when comparing the two traditions and their texts.
Anderson, P. N.1996. The Christology of the Fourth Gospel: Its Unity and Disunity in Light of John 6. Valley Forge, PA: Trinity Press International.
2.
Barrett, C.K.!978. The Gospel according to St John. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press.
3.
Bauer, W., Arndt, W.F., F. W.Gingrich, & F. W.Danker. 1979. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Best, E.1998. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Ephesians. International Critical Commentary. London, UK: T&T Clark.
5.
Bilby, M. G.2018. “The First Dionysian Gospel: Imitational and Redactional Layers in Luke and John.” Pp. 49–68 in Classical Greek Models of the Gospels and Acts: Studies in Mimesis Criticism, edited byM. G.Bilby, M.Kochenash, & M.Froelich. Claremont Studies in New Testament and Christian Origins 3. Claremont, CA: Claremont Press.
6.
Boorstin, D. J.1993. The Creators: A History of Heroes of the Imagination. New York NY: 1st Vintage Books.
7.
Brant, J-A. A.2018. Review: Dennis R.MacDonald: The Dionysian Gospel: The Fourth Gospel and Euripides. Review of Biblical Literature 03/2018. On-line at https://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/11778_13140.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2020.
8.
Brant, J-A. A.2011. John, Paideia Commentaries on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
9.
Brant, J-A. A.2004. Dialogue and Drama: Elements of Greek Tragedy in the Fourth Gospel. Peabody MA: Hendrickson.
10.
Brodie, T. L.1993. The Gospel according to John: A Literary and Theological Commentary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Brown, R. E.1966–1970. The Gospel according to John. 2 vols. The Anchor Bible 29, 29A. London, UK: Geoffrey Chapman.
12.
Burchard, C.1987. “The Importance of Joseph and Aseneth for the Study of the New Testament: A General Survey and a Fresh Look at the Lord’s Supper.”New Testament Studies33:102–34.
13.
Chilton, B.1994. A Feast of Meanings: Eucharistic Theologies from Jesus through Johannine Circles. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
14.
Cicero. 1933. On the Nature of the Gods. Academics. Translated byH.Rackham. Loeb Classical Library 268. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
Daly-Denton, M.2009. “Drinking the Water that Jesus Gives: A Feature of the Johannine Eucharist?” Pp. 345–65 in A Wandering Galilean: Essays in Honour of Seán Freyne, edited byZ.Rodgers with M.Daly-Denton and A. F.McKinley. Supplements to the Journal for the Study of Judaism, vol. 132. Leiden. The Netherlands: Brill.
16.
Dulles, A., S.J.1988. Models of the Church: A Critical Assessment of the Church in all its Aspects. 2nd ed. Dublin, Ireland: Gill & Macmillan.
Engberg-Pedersen, T. (ed.). 2001. Paul beyond the Judaism/Hellenism Divide. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
19.
Freke, T., & P.Gandy. 2000. The Jesus Mysteries. New York, NY: Random House.
20.
Friesen, C. J. P.2015. Reading Dionysus: Euripides’ Bacchae and the Cultural Contestations of Greeks, Jews, Romans, and Christians. Studien und Texte zu Antike und Christentum95. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
21.
García-Gasco, R.2011. “Dionysism in late Antiquity: The Three Dionysos in the Dionysiaca”. Pp. 367–79 in New Perspectives on Late Antiquity, edited byD. H.de la Fuente. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
22.
Gerhardsson, B.1998. Transmission in Rabbinic Judaism and Early Christianity. Published together in one volume with Tradition and Transmission in Early Christianity. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans.
23.
Halverson, J. S.2006. “The Context of the Eucharistic Liturgy” in Preaching at the Double Feast: Homiletics for Eucharistic Worship, edited byM.Monshau. Collegeville MN: Liturgical Press
24.
Harrington, K.P. & J.Pucci. 1962. Medieval Latin. 2nd ed. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
Hengel, M.1995. Studies in Early Christology. London, UK: SCM Press.
26.
Hengel, M.1974. Judaism and Hellenism: Studies in their Encounter in Palestine in the Early Hellenistic Period, translated byJ.Bowden. London, UK: SCM Press.
27.
Henrichs, A.1984. “Loss of Self, Suffering, Violence: The Modern View of Dionysus from Nietzsche to Girard.”Harvard Studies in Classical Philology88: 205–40.
28.
Henrichs, A.1982. “Changing Dionysiac Identities”. Pp. 137–60 & 213–36 in Jewish and Christion Self-Definition, vol. 3: Self-Definition in the Graeco-Roman World, edited byE. P.Sanders, A. I.Baumgarten, & A.Mendelson. London, UK: SCM Press.
29.
Henrichs, A.1978. “Greek Maenadism from Olympias to Messalina.”Harvard Studies in Classical Philology82: 121–60.
30.
Jones, L. P.1997. The Symbol of Water in The Gospel of John. Journal for the Study of the New Testament Supplement Series 145. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
Keener, C.S.2003. The Gospel of John: A Commentary, vol. 1. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
33.
Kennedy, B. H.1879. Latin Grammar. London, UK: Longmans, Green & Co.
34.
Kelly, W. L.2020. How Prophecy Works: A Study of the Semantic Field of נביא and a Close Reading of Jeremiah 1:4–9, 23:9–40 and 27:1–28:17. Göttingen, Germany: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
35.
Kerényi, C.1976. Dionysos: Archetypal Image of the Indestructible Life, translated byR.Mannheim. Bollingen SeriesLXV.2. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
King, F. J.2007. More than a Passover: Inculturation in the Supper Narratives of the New Testament. New Testament Studies in Contextual Exegesis3. Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.
37.
Kobel, E.2011. Dining with John: Communal Meals and Identity Formation in the Fourth Gospel and Its Historical and Cultural Context. Biblical Interpretation Series109. Leiden. The Netherlands: Brill.
38.
Koester, C. R.1995. Symbolism in the Fourth Gospel: Meaning, Mystery, Community. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
39.
Köstenberger, A. J.2007. “John. Pp. 415–512 in Commentary on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament, edited byG. K.Beale & D. A.Carson. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic/Apollos.
40.
Lee, D. A.2020. “Symbolism and ‘Signs.’” Pp. 55–73 in Creation, Matter and the Image of God: Essays on John. Adelaide. Australia: ATF.
41.
Linforth, I. M.1931. “Two Notes on the Legend of Orpheus.”Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association62: 5–17.
42.
Lovano, M.2019The World of Ancient Greece: A Daily Life Encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
43.
MacDonald, D. R.2017. The Dionysian Gospel: The Fourth Gospel and Euripides. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
44.
MacDonald, D. R.2015. The Gospels and Homer: Imitations of Greek Epic in Mark and Luke–Acts. New Testament and Greek Literature1. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
McGowan, A. B.2014. Ancient Christian Worship: Early Church Practices in Social, Historical and Theological Perspective. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
47.
Malina, B. J., & R. L.Rohrbaugh. 1998. Social-Science Commentary on the Gospel of John. Minneapolis MI: Fortress Press.
48.
Massa, F.2012. “The Meeting between Dionysus and the Christians in the Historiographical Debate of the XIX and XX Centuries.”Historia Religionum4: 159–82.
49.
Metzger, B.1968. Historical and Literary Studies: Pagan, Jewish and Christian. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
50.
Mitchell, M. M.2003. “Homer in the New Testament?”The Journal of Religion83/2: 244–60.
51.
Moloney, F. B.1998. The Gospel of John. Sacra Pagina4. Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press.
52.
Obbink, D.1993. “Dionysus Poured Out: Ancient and Modern Theories of Sacrifice and Cultural Formation.” Pp. 65–86 in Masks of Dionysus, edited byT. H.Carpenter & C.Faraone. Ithaca NY/London, UK: Cornell University Press.
53.
Otto, W. F.1965. Dionysus: Myth and Cult, translated with an introduction byR. B.Palmer. Bloomington/Indianapolis IN: Indiana University Press.
54.
Paglia, C.1992. “Junk Bonds and Corporate Raiders: Academe in the Hour of the Wolf.” Pp. 170–248 in Sex, Art, and American Culture. London, UK: Viking.
55.
Park, C. S.2018. “John’s Politics of Imitation”. Pp. 43–48 in Classical Greek Models of the Gospels and Acts: Studies in Mimesis Criticism, edited by M. G.Bilby, M.Kochenash. & M.Froelich. Claremont Studies in New Testament and Christian Origins 3. Claremont, CA: Claremont Press.
56.
Parker, R.1983. Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
Perris, S., & F.Mac Góráin. 2020. “The Ancient Reception of Euripides’ Bacchae from Athens to Byzantium.” Pp. 39–84 in Dionysus and Rome, edited byF.Mac Góráin. Trends in Classics—Supplementary Volumes, vol. 93. Berlin, Germany: de Gruyter.
58.
Porter, S. E., J. T.Reed, & M. B.O’Donnell. 2010. Fundamentals of New Testament Greek. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
59.
Robbins, V. K.1996. Exploring the Texture of Texts. Valley Forge PA: Trinity Press International.
60.
Rose, H. J.1984. “Mythological Introduction”. Pp. x–xix in Nonnus, Dionysiaca Books 1–15, translated byW. H. D.Rouse. Loeb Classical Library, vol. 344. Revised ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
Sandmel, S.1962. “Parallelomania.”Journal of Biblical Literature81/1: 1–13.
62.
Sandnes, K. O.2011. The Gospel “According to Homer and Virgil”: Cento and Canon. Novum Testamentum Supplements Series138. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
63.
Sandnes, K. O.2009. The Challenge of Homer: School, Pagan Poets, and Early Christianity. Library of New Testament Studies 400. London, UK: T&T Clark.
64.
Sandnes, K. O.2005. “Imitatio Homeri?: An Appraisal of Dennis R. MacDonald’s ‘Mimesis Criticism.’”Journal of Biblical Literature124/4: 715–32.
65.
Schnackenburg, R.1980. The Gospel according to St John, vol. 1. London, UK: Burns & Oates.
66.
Seaford, R.2006. Dionysos. London, UK/New York NY: Routledge.
67.
Segal, C.1978. “The Menace of Dionysus: Sex Roles and Reversals in Euripides’ Bacchae.”Arethusa11: 182–202.
68.
Smith, J. Z.1990. Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69.
Smith, T.2018. Review: Dennis R.MacDonald: The Dionysian Gospel: The Fourth Gospel and Euripides. Review of Biblical Literature 12/2018. On-line at https://www.bookreviews.org/pdf/11778_14227.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2020.
70.
Theissen, G., & A.Merz. 1998. The Historical Jesus: A Comprehensive Guide, Minneapolis MN: Fortress Press.
71.
Thorburn, J. E.2006. “Hospitality.” Pp. 370–72 in Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece, edited byN.Wilson. New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
Tripolitis, A.2002. Religions of the Hellenistic-Roman Age. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
73.
Versnel, H. S.1990. Ter Unus: Isis, Dionysos, Hermes—Three Studies in Henotheism. Inconsistencies in Greek and Roman Religion, vol. 1. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
Weaver, J.B.2004. Plots of Epiphany: Prison Escape in Acts of the Apostles(Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft und die Kunde der älteren Kirche, Band 131. Berlin, Germany/New York, NY: Walter de Gruyter.
76.
Whitmarsh, T.2018. Dirty Love: The Genealogy of the Ancient Greek Novel. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
77.
Wick, P.2004. “Jesus gegen Dionysos? Ein Beitrag zur Kontextualisierung des Johannesevangeliums.”Biblica85: 179–98.
78.
Zizioulas, J. D.2011. The Eucharistic Communion and the World, edited byL. B.Tallon. London, UK: T & T Clark.
